Search people, articles, bills, and more
“Amendment SA 925 ruled out of order by the chair.”
This amendment would have created a new Senate rule to block any future legislation that would increase energy costs for Americans, including prices for electricity, construction, and travel. However, the amendment was ruled out of order, meaning it was rejected and did not become part of the budget plan.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
“Amendment SA 925 ruled out of order by the chair.”
This amendment would have created a new Senate rule to block any future legislation that would increase energy costs for Americans, including prices for electricity, construction, and travel. However, the amendment was ruled out of order, meaning it was rejected and did not become part of the budget plan.
If it had been adopted, this rule would have made it more difficult for the Senate to pass laws that increase energy expenses, likely requiring a 60-vote majority to bypass the objection.
This primarily affects Senate lawmakers by changing the rules for debate, but it was aimed at protecting American consumers from rising utility and fuel prices.