Search people, articles, bills, and more
“Amendment SA 699 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 52. Record Vote Number: 81.”
This amendment proposed creating a special budget placeholder to help local police departments hire or rehire officers for community policing and crime prevention. It was designed to be 'deficit-neutral,' meaning any new spending would have to be balanced out elsewhere in the budget. The amendment failed in the Senate, so it was not included in the budget plan.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
“Amendment SA 699 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 52. Record Vote Number: 81.”
This amendment proposed creating a special budget placeholder to help local police departments hire or rehire officers for community policing and crime prevention. It was designed to be 'deficit-neutral,' meaning any new spending would have to be balanced out elsewhere in the budget. The amendment failed in the Senate, so it was not included in the budget plan.
The amendment was intended to signal a commitment to federal support for local law enforcement hiring, though its failure means this specific budgetary 'fast-track' for police funding will not be available in this budget cycle.
If it had passed and led to future legislation, local law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve would have been the most directly impacted through potential increases in staffing.