Search people, articles, bills, and more
“Amendment SA 878 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 53. Record Vote Number: 66.”
This amendment proposed swapping fast-track budget rules for a bipartisan plan to split $342 billion equally between defense spending and domestic programs like veteran care and disaster relief. Because it failed, the original budget plan's rules and spending priorities remain unchanged.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
“Amendment SA 878 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 53. Record Vote Number: 66.”
This amendment proposed swapping fast-track budget rules for a bipartisan plan to split $342 billion equally between defense spending and domestic programs like veteran care and disaster relief. Because it failed, the original budget plan's rules and spending priorities remain unchanged.
This amendment represented an attempt to force a bipartisan, balanced approach to spending increases for both the military and social programs. Its failure keeps the door open for the majority party to use specialized budget rules to pass legislation without needing minority party support.
This amendment would have most directly impacted veterans, farmers, and victims of natural disasters by earmarking specific billions for their support, as well as the Department of Defense.