Search people, articles, bills, and more
“Amendment SA 1726 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 51. Record Vote Number: 173.”
This amendment attempted to remove specific instructions that required the Agriculture Committee to change its spending levels as part of the national budget plan. Because the amendment failed, those instructions remain in the budget, meaning the committee is still expected to find ways to reduce spending on agricultural and food programs.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
“Amendment SA 1726 not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 51. Record Vote Number: 173.”
This amendment attempted to remove specific instructions that required the Agriculture Committee to change its spending levels as part of the national budget plan. Because the amendment failed, those instructions remain in the budget, meaning the committee is still expected to find ways to reduce spending on agricultural and food programs.
If it had passed, it would have shielded agriculture and nutrition programs from the 'reconciliation' process, which is a fast-track way for Congress to pass spending changes with a simple majority vote.
This primarily affects people involved in the agricultural sector, such as farmers and ranchers, as well as low-income families who rely on federal food assistance programs like SNAP.