Search people, articles, bills, and more
“Amendment SA 1661 not agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.”
This amendment would have created a procedural rule making it harder for Congress to cut funding for social programs like Meals on Wheels and Head Start while giving tax cuts to billionaires. It would have allowed senators to formally object to any bill that swapped funding for these essential services to pay for tax breaks for the extremely wealthy.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
“Amendment SA 1661 not agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.”
This amendment would have created a procedural rule making it harder for Congress to cut funding for social programs like Meals on Wheels and Head Start while giving tax cuts to billionaires. It would have allowed senators to formally object to any bill that swapped funding for these essential services to pay for tax breaks for the extremely wealthy.
This amendment was an attempt to set a priority for future spending bills, specifically protecting programs for children and seniors. If it had passed, it would have made it much more difficult for future laws to reduce social spending if those laws also included tax cuts for the wealthy.
This would have most directly affected low-income seniors who rely on food programs, working parents using childcare assistance, and billionaires who might benefit from future tax legislation.