Search people, articles, bills, and more
The Senate rejected an amendment to a pending resolution in a narrow 49-50 vote, where both parties were internally divided.
This vote was on a "second-degree" amendment (S.Amdt. 1989), which is a formal proposal to change the language of another amendment (S.Amdt. 1717) that was already being considered. The underlying measure, H.Con.Res. 14, is a concurrent resolution, which is typically used for internal congressional matters or to express the collective opinion of the House and Senate. In the Senate, amendments allow members to suggest additions or subtractions to a bill or resolution before a final vote is taken. Because this was an amendment to an amendment, it represents a specific technical or policy adjustment to a larger set of changes. To pass, it required a simple majority of those present and voting. The amendment failed by a single vote, with 49 senators in favor and 50 against. The outcome was notable because both the Democratic and Republican parties were split almost down the middle. Because the amendment was rejected, the Senate moved forward with the resolution as it existed before these changes were proposed.
The Senate will continue to consider the underlying amendment or the main resolution without the changes proposed in this specific vote.
Why it matters. This was an extremely close tactical vote where a single member's presence or a single vote shift would have changed the outcome of the legislative text.
Who’s affected. Legislative stakeholders: Supporters of the proposed change must now seek other ways to modify the resolution, as this specific path was blocked.
Democrats. The Democratic caucus was divided, with 20 members voting for the amendment and 24 voting against it.
Republicans. The Republican caucus was also split, with 25 members supporting the amendment and 26 opposing it.
The Senate rejected an amendment to a pending resolution in a narrow 49-50 vote, where both parties were internally divided.