1 story credited to That Park Place
Latest story Apr 16, 2026 · on ChamberLight since Apr 2026
A story can appear as several articles (copies of the same piece), so counts of stories and of articles differ.
Scores for That Park Place
Writing quality not enough rated stories yet: 1 of 10. How it is measured
Scores last checked Sep 24, 2026.
Stories ChamberLight collected, by month
Stories credited to That Park Place, by publication date. ChamberLight collects articles that mention the officials it tracks, so this shows its own coverage of this source, not how much the source publishes.
- Stories from That Park Place
- Shaded: ChamberLight collected no stories, or almost none, from any outlet (a gap in its collection, not in the outlet’s publishing)
Show as a table
| Month | Stories | All outlets |
|---|---|---|
| April 2026 | 1 | 1,805 |
| May 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| June 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| July 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| August 2026 | 0 | 1 (collection gap) |
| September 2026 | 0 | 598 |
Top topics
Share of this source’s stories tagged with each topic. A story can carry several topics, so the shares do not add up to 100%.
- Economy1
100% of 1 stories · 26% across all outlets
- Ethics/Corruption1
100% of 1 stories · 62% across all outlets
- Technology/Privacy1
100% of 1 stories · 10% across all outlets
The thin mark on each bar is the topic’s share across all outlets.
Who they cover
Party of the officials these stories are mainly about, across all 2 officials named. A story counts once for each official it is mainly about, so the split is over 2 story–official pairs, from 1 story.
- Democrat100% · 2 pairs
Most covered
Stories mainly about each official, and their share of the source’s 1 story.
Article tone
ChamberLight’s article analysis assigns each story a tone toward the official it covers. It describes the coverage of that official, not That Park Place’s stance, and reader votes do not change it. 1 story.
- Good Look
- 0 (0%)
- Mixed
- 1 (100%)
- Informational
- 0 (0%)
- Bad Look
- 0 (0%)
Challenges to these scores
No one has challenged a score on this page yet. Anyone can; editors publish every outcome here.
Articles served from thatparkplace.com
2
Mark Ruffalo Rails Against Paramount WB Merger in Front of U.S. Senate
Hollywood actor and activist Mark Ruffalo took aim at the proposed Paramount-Skydance merger this week, appearing before a U.S. Senate hearing to warn about what he described as serious consequences for the entertainment industry and media landscape. Ruffalo, speaking via videoconference during a hearing organized by Sen. Cory Booker, didn’t hold back as he framed the deal as a threat not just to Hollywood jobs, but to the broader concept of a free press. “We do not have to watch Citizen Kane or read 1984 to understand that the concentrated oligarchic control this merger represents is a threat to free press, an informed populace and democracy itself.” Source Photo Credit: CNN; YouTube, Bloomberg Podcasts That warning lands at a time when the proposed merger would place CNN under Paramount’s control, a move that has sparked concern among progressive critics who fear the network’s editorial direction could shift under new ownership. Ruffalo himself pointed to those concerns during the hearing, referencing growing anxiety over how consolidation at this level could influence major news outlets. However, supporters of the merger argue that CNN has been biased from the start and that the Ellison’s are simply trying to bring the network into a more centrist editorial direction. For progressive activists like Ruffalo, that’s seemingly a threat. The Marvel actor’s comments came as part of a broader push from thousands of Hollywood figures who have signed an open letter opposing the merger. Ruffalo Warns of “Devastating” Industry Consequences Throughout his testimony, Ruffalo repeatedly argued that consolidation at this scale would lead to fewer opportunities, layoffs, and less creative output—despite assurances from executives behind the deal. “Don’t trust empty promises from billionaires driven by greed and corrosive ideology,” he said. “Don’t trust that this new company will somehow make more films with less money and so much more debt.” He added that the impact would extend far beyond Hollywood insiders. Mark Ruffalo speaking at the 2017 San Diego Comic Con International, for “Thor: Ragnarok” Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0>, via Wikimedia Commons “The merger threatens more than our livelihoods. It threatens one of the world’s most vital industries.” Ruffalo also pointed to recent job losses as evidence of what could come next. “The pattern is documented and predictably repeats in merger announcements, promises of efficiencies, then mass layoffs and production cuts,” he said. Ruffalo also warned the situation could escalate dramatically: “I can personally say that Los Angeles right now is hanging by a thread.” According to Ruffalo, “tens of thousands” of media jobs could ultimately be at risk if the deal moves forward. Senate Democrats Echo Concerns Ruffalo’s warnings were reinforced by remarks from Senate Democrats present at the hearing, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. “When monopolies like this run rampant, costs go up… Competition goes down… Innovation dies. Independence is weakened,” Schumer said. A screenshot from Thor Ragnarok where Hulk, played by Mark Ruffalo talks with Thor, played by Chris Hemsworth – YouTube, U Media The senator went even further, calling the merger outright dangerous. “This merger is a nightmare,” he said, claiming it, “reeks of corruption and political manipulation.” Notably, the hearing was attended exclusively by Democrats, with no Republican senators participating. A Sudden Shift in Hollywood Outrage? While Ruffalo’s comments were forceful, they also raise an obvious question: where was this level of concern during previous major media consolidation efforts? Bob Iger via CNBC Television YouTube Ruffalo did not publicly mount a similar campaign when Warner Bros. Discovery was previously in talks with Netflix, nor was there a comparable outcry from him during Disney’s acquisition of 21st Century Fox—one of the largest media mergers in modern history. That discrepancy has not gone unnoticed, especially given the political undertones surrounding the current deal. Politics Loom Over the Paramount Deal The proposed merger, valued at approximately $111 billion, would give Paramount control over a massive portfolio that includes HBO, DC Studios, CNN, and more. Ruffalo himself hinted at political concerns tied to the deal, particularly regarding CNN. David Ellison in an interview with Bloomberg – YouTube, Bloomberg Podcasts The Ellison family, which is leading the Paramount-Skydance effort, has been widely viewed as politically connected, including perceived ties to President Trump’s orbit. Meanwhile, CNN has long been regarded as a left-leaning outlet, raising concerns among progressive activists that new ownership could shift its editorial direction. Ruffalo referenced those fears indirectly by highlighting concerns about influence over news organizations and the potential for media consolidation to shape public discourse. At the same time, critics of Ruffalo’s stance argue that Hollywood’s sudden alarm may have less to do with consolidation itself and more to do with who is doing the consolidating. The Bigger Picture The Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery merger remains under regulatory review and has already drawn scrutiny from state attorneys general. If approved, the deal would create one of the most powerful media entities in the world—combining legacy studios, streaming platforms, and major news outlets under a single corporate umbrella. Mark Ruffalo being interviewed by Jimmy Kimmel – Youtube, Jimmy Kimmel Live Whether Ruffalo’s warnings resonate beyond Hollywood remains to be seen. But his appearance before the Senate show’s this isn’t just about business—it’s about who controls the future of entertainment and information. And in that battle, the lines are being drawn as much along political divisions as they are corporate ones. How do you feel about Mark Ruffalo and his opposition to the Paramount WB merger? Sound off in the comments and let us know! UP NEXT: Netflix Drops ‘Little House on the Prairie’ Trailer As Fans Brace For Impact The post Mark Ruffalo Rails Against Paramount WB Merger in Front of U.S. Senate appeared first on That Park Place.
Mark Ruffalo Rails Against Paramount WB Merger in Front of U.S. Senate
Hollywood actor and activist Mark Ruffalo took aim at the proposed Paramount-Skydance merger this week, appearing before a U.S. Senate hearing to warn about what he described as serious consequences for the entertainment industry and media landscape. Ruffalo, speaking via videoconference during a hearing organized by Sen. Cory Booker, didn’t hold back as he framed the deal as a threat not just to Hollywood jobs, but to the broader concept of a free press. “We do not have to watch Citizen Kane or read 1984 to understand that the concentrated oligarchic control this merger represents is a threat to free press, an informed populace and democracy itself.” Source Photo Credit: CNN; YouTube, Bloomberg Podcasts That warning lands at a time when the proposed merger would place CNN under Paramount’s control, a move that has sparked concern among progressive critics who fear the network’s editorial direction could shift under new ownership. Ruffalo himself pointed to those concerns during the hearing, referencing growing anxiety over how consolidation at this level could influence major news outlets. However, supporters of the merger argue that CNN has been biased from the start and that the Ellison’s are simply trying to bring the network into a more centrist editorial direction. For progressive activists like Ruffalo, that’s seemingly a threat. The Marvel actor’s comments came as part of a broader push from thousands of Hollywood figures who have signed an open letter opposing the merger. Ruffalo Warns of “Devastating” Industry Consequences Throughout his testimony, Ruffalo repeatedly argued that consolidation at this scale would lead to fewer opportunities, layoffs, and less creative output—despite assurances from executives behind the deal. “Don’t trust empty promises from billionaires driven by greed and corrosive ideology,” he said. “Don’t trust that this new company will somehow make more films with less money and so much more debt.” He added that the impact would extend far beyond Hollywood insiders. Mark Ruffalo speaking at the 2017 San Diego Comic Con International, for “Thor: Ragnarok” Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0>, via Wikimedia Commons “The merger threatens more than our livelihoods. It threatens one of the world’s most vital industries.” Ruffalo also pointed to recent job losses as evidence of what could come next. “The pattern is documented and predictably repeats in merger announcements, promises of efficiencies, then mass layoffs and production cuts,” he said. Ruffalo also warned the situation could escalate dramatically: “I can personally say that Los Angeles right now is hanging by a thread.” According to Ruffalo, “tens of thousands” of media jobs could ultimately be at risk if the deal moves forward. Senate Democrats Echo Concerns Ruffalo’s warnings were reinforced by remarks from Senate Democrats present at the hearing, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. “When monopolies like this run rampant, costs go up… Competition goes down… Innovation dies. Independence is weakened,” Schumer said. A screenshot from Thor Ragnarok where Hulk, played by Mark Ruffalo talks with Thor, played by Chris Hemsworth – YouTube, U Media The senator went even further, calling the merger outright dangerous. “This merger is a nightmare,” he said, claiming it, “reeks of corruption and political manipulation.” Notably, the hearing was attended exclusively by Democrats, with no Republican senators participating. A Sudden Shift in Hollywood Outrage? While Ruffalo’s comments were forceful, they also raise an obvious question: where was this level of concern during previous major media consolidation efforts? Bob Iger via CNBC Television YouTube Ruffalo did not publicly mount a similar campaign when Warner Bros. Discovery was previously in talks with Netflix, nor was there a comparable outcry from him during Disney’s acquisition of 21st Century Fox—one of the largest media mergers in modern history. That discrepancy has not gone unnoticed, especially given the political undertones surrounding the current deal. Politics Loom Over the Paramount Deal The proposed merger, valued at approximately $111 billion, would give Paramount control over a massive portfolio that includes HBO, DC Studios, CNN, and more. Ruffalo himself hinted at political concerns tied to the deal, particularly regarding CNN. David Ellison in an interview with Bloomberg – YouTube, Bloomberg Podcasts The Ellison family, which is leading the Paramount-Skydance effort, has been widely viewed as politically connected, including perceived ties to President Trump’s orbit. Meanwhile, CNN has long been regarded as a left-leaning outlet, raising concerns among progressive activists that new ownership could shift its editorial direction. Ruffalo referenced those fears indirectly by highlighting concerns about influence over news organizations and the potential for media consolidation to shape public discourse. At the same time, critics of Ruffalo’s stance argue that Hollywood’s sudden alarm may have less to do with consolidation itself and more to do with who is doing the consolidating. The Bigger Picture The Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery merger remains under regulatory review and has already drawn scrutiny from state attorneys general. If approved, the deal would create one of the most powerful media entities in the world—combining legacy studios, streaming platforms, and major news outlets under a single corporate umbrella. Mark Ruffalo being interviewed by Jimmy Kimmel – Youtube, Jimmy Kimmel Live Whether Ruffalo’s warnings resonate beyond Hollywood remains to be seen. But his appearance before the Senate show’s this isn’t just about business—it’s about who controls the future of entertainment and information. And in that battle, the lines are being drawn as much along political divisions as they are corporate ones. How do you feel about Mark Ruffalo and his opposition to the Paramount WB merger? Sound off in the comments and let us know! UP NEXT: Netflix Drops ‘Little House on the Prairie’ Trailer As Fans Brace For Impact The post Mark Ruffalo Rails Against Paramount WB Merger in Front of U.S. Senate appeared first on That Park Place.