Stories credited to Survive the News, by publication date. ChamberLight collects articles that mention the officials it tracks, so this shows its own coverage of this source, not how much the source publishes.

Stories from Survive the News
Shaded: ChamberLight collected no stories, or almost none, from any outlet (a gap in its collection, not in the outlet’s publishing)

Show as a table

Month	Stories	All outlets
March 2026	1	148
April 2026	4	4,537
May 2026	0	none collected
June 2026	0	none collected
July 2026	0	none collected
August 2026	0	1 (collection gap)
September 2026	0	598

Who they cover

Party of the officials these stories are mainly about, across all 7 officials named. A story counts once for each official it is mainly about, so the split is over 9 story–official pairs, from 5 stories.

Democrat44% · 4 pairs
Republican33% · 3 pairs
Independent11% · 1 pair
Party not recorded11% · 1 pair

Most covered

Stories mainly about each official, and their share of the source’s 5 stories.

Article tone

ChamberLight’s article analysis assigns each story a tone toward the official it covers. It describes the coverage of that official, not Survive the News’s stance, and reader votes do not change it. 5 stories.

Good Look: 0 (0%)
Mixed: 5 (100%)
Informational: 0 (0%)
Bad Look: 0 (0%)

Challenges to these scores

No one has challenged a score on this page yet. Anyone can; editors publish every outcome here.

Articles served from survivethenews.com

Trump puts Fed Chair Jerome Powell on notice, threatens to fire him if he doesn’t resign by May 15 – NaturalNews.com

Trump puts Fed Chair Jerome Powell on notice, threatens to fire him if he doesn’t resign by May 15 In a dramatic escalation of his long-running feud with the Federal Reserve, President Donald Trump has drawn a hard line in the sand, publicly declaring he will fire Chair Jerome Powell if he does not vacate his position by next month. This ultimatum, delivered in a Fox Business interview on Wednesday, reveals a raw power struggle at the highest levels of government. Far from a simple policy disagreement, this confrontation represents a fundamental clash over the independence of the nation’s central bank, weaponized by a Department of Justice investigation widely seen as a political hit job. The stage is now set for a constitutional and financial crisis by May 15, as Trump seeks to dismantle what he views as a bastion of incompetent, unaccountable power, while the Fed’s defenders warn of a dangerous politicization of the world’s most influential financial institution. Meanwhile, Americans are stuck in the middle — in the mud of an economic tug of war of rising inflation, while paying higher interest rates for homes, vehicles, and other things they need. The Federal Reserve’s attempt to curb inflation through higher interest rates has only made it more expensive for Americans to obtain the things they need, like homes. Key points: President Trump has declared he will fire Fed Chair Jerome Powell if Powell does not step down when his chair term expires on May 15. Trump’s threat is complicated by a controversial DOJ criminal investigation into Powell regarding the Fed’s $2.5 billion headquarters renovation, which a federal judge has already ruled is politically motivated. Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) is blocking the confirmation of Trump’s nominee, Kevin Warsh, until the Powell probe is resolved, creating a political gridlock. Powell has vowed to remain on the Fed Board until the investigation concludes “with transparency and finality,” setting up a potential legal battle over the president’s authority to remove him. The Supreme Court is separately reviewing a related case involving Fed Governor Lisa Cook, which could define the limits of presidential power over the supposedly independent Federal Reserve. The weaponization of justice and a deadline for dismissal The core of this explosive standoff is not merely about interest rates, but about the mechanisms of power. Trump nominated Powell to the Fed chair in 2017, but the relationship soured as the president demanded aggressive rate cuts. The friction has now metastasized into a full-blown confrontation, centered on a Department of Justice investigation led by U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro. This probe alleges Powell lied to Congress about cost overruns in the Fed’s $2.5 billion headquarters renovation—a project Trump has repeatedly cited as evidence of mismanagement. However, the integrity of this investigation is in tatters. A federal judge, James Boasberg, quashed the DOJ’s subpoenas last month, finding “abundant evidence that the subpoenas’ dominant (if not sole) purpose is to harass and pressure Powell either to yield to the President or to resign.” The judge noted the government offered “no evidence whatsoever that Powell committed any crime other than displeasing the President.” Despite this judicial rebuke, prosecutors attempted an unannounced visit to the Fed construction site this week, signaling the administration’s refusal to back down. Powell has dug in, stating, “I have no intention of leaving the board until the investigation is well and truly over, with transparency and finality.” This creates a perfect Catch-22: the investigation designed to pressure Powell out is also preventing his replacement from being confirmed, as Senator Tillis refuses to move on nominee Kevin Warsh until the probe ends. Inflation, interest, and the crushing debt trap for everyday Americans Beneath the political theater lies the brutal economic reality facing millions of Americans. The Federal Reserve, under Powell, has aggressively raised interest rates to combat the inflation crisis that erupted following years of unprecedented monetary stimulus. While the official narrative champions this as a necessary medicine to cool the economy, the side effects are crippling. Americans are now trapped in a vise: they are punished by persistent inflation on the goods they need, while simultaneously being bled dry by soaring interest payments to banks for the necessities of modern life—homes and vehicles. This dual assault decimates purchasing power and locks families into debt servitude. The argument from the White House is that by forcing the Fed to lower rates, relief would flow directly to the people struggling with mortgage and auto payments, rather than enriching the banking cartel. Critics, including GOP senators like John Kennedy who have defended Fed independence, warn that capitulating to political pressure for lower rates would abandon the fight against inflation, guaranteeing its long-term entrenchment and ultimately harming the very people Trump claims to help. It is a dire choice between immediate debt relief and long-term price stability—a choice the Fed was designed to make free from political cycles. With the May 15 deadline looming, the nation is barreling toward uncharted legal territory. Trump has stated plainly, “I’ve held back firing him… Well then, I’ll have to fire him.” Yet, firing a Fed chair is not clearly within a president’s power. The Federal Reserve Act states that board members, including the chair, may only be removed “for cause,” a high legal bar typically interpreted as malfeasance or neglect of duty, not policy disagreements. Powell, a lawyer himself, has consistently asserted the president cannot remove him, and he would almost certainly challenge such an action in court. The Supreme Court is currently deliberating a parallel case regarding Trump’s attempt to remove Fed Governor Lisa Cook, and its ruling could either hand the president a powerful new weapon or reaffirm the Fed’s operational independence. Sources include: 100PercentFedUp.com X.com X.com The post Trump puts Fed Chair Jerome Powell on notice, threatens to fire him if he doesn’t resign by May 15 – NaturalNews.com appeared first on Survive the News.

Apr 16, 202615 votes

Trump puts Fed Chair Jerome Powell on notice, threatens to fire him if he doesn’t resign by May 15 – NaturalNews.com

Apr 16, 202616 votes

Nearly 100 arrested in Manhattan protest targeting senators over U.S. arms sales to Israel – NaturalNews.com

Nearly 100 arrested in Manhattan protest targeting senators over U.S. arms sales to Israel Nearly 100 activists were arrested in Manhattan protesting U.S. arms sales to Israel. The demonstration targeted Senators Schumer and Gillibrand for their support of military aid. Protesters escalated from a lobby sit-in to blocking a major avenue, halting traffic. The action supported a legislative effort to block a specific sale of bombs and bulldozers. Participants cited moral opposition to enabling overseas conflict through tax dollars. In the heart of Manhattan, where the decisions of powerful politicians ripple across the globe, nearly 100 activists were handcuffed and loaded onto buses this week. Their crime? A peaceful, disruptive protest directly challenging two of New York’s most influential senators over their support for continued American arms sales to Israel. The demonstration, led by Jewish Voice for Peace and featuring notable figures like whistleblower Chelsea Manning and NYC Council Member Alexa Aviles, underscores a growing, vocal dissent against U.S. foreign policy that citizens feel is being carried out without their consent. On Monday, approximately 200 protesters gathered at 780 Third Avenue, the building housing the offices of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Senator Kirsten Gillibrand. Their mission was to demand an end to the flow of American bombs and bulldozers to the Israeli military. This action was timed to coincide with an effort by Senator Bernie Sanders to force a vote on legislation blocking a specific sale of weapons. A direct appeal to lawmakers The protesters first attempted a sit-in inside the building’s lobby but were blocked by security. Undeterred, they moved just outside the entrance, shedding outer layers to reveal T-shirts with messages like “Fund People Not Bombs” and “No War, No ICE, Free Palestine.” Their chants echoed off the skyscraper: “Schumer, Gillibrand, talk is cheap! / They’re sending bombs, how can you sleep?” Danny Kaplowitz, a 25-year-old union worker who was later detained, expressed the frustration fueling the protest. “We’ve seen for far too long our elected leaders vote over and over again to send endless weapons to the Israeli military, even as they commit genocide and countless atrocities in full view of the world,” he said. City Councilwoman Sandy Nurse, who participated but was not arrested, criticized the senators for walking a “timid, passive line of supporting this war.” From sidewalk to street blockade When their appeals at the door yielded no response from the senators, the demonstration escalated. Around 1:15 p.m., roughly half the group moved into Third Avenue, a major north-south artery, and sat down in the roadway, halting traffic for about an hour. They sang, “Let Gaza live, let Iran live, let Lebanon live.” This move prompted a response from the New York Police Department’s Strategic Response Group. Officers began placing protesters in zip ties and escorting them to waiting buses. The police confirmed about 90 people were taken into custody. Among those detained was Chelsea Manning, the former Army intelligence analyst known for leaking classified documents. Protesters largely went limp and were carried by officers when they refused to stand. The protest was explicitly tied to a specific arms package. Sanders’s office stated the legislation aims to block the sale of 12,000 thousand-pound bombs, valued at $152 million, and $295 million worth of bulldozers. The Trump administration argues these tools are for Israel’s defense and deterrence. However, Sanders’s office contends the bombs are for use in Gaza and Lebanon and the bulldozers for demolishing homes in those territories and the West Bank. For some protesters, the issue is deeply personal and informed by experience. Thom Keppen, a 38-year-old Army veteran deployed to Afghanistan, said he was protesting because of his firsthand experience with “reckless and ill-conceived wars.” He drew a direct parallel, stating, “I’m seeing this same dehumanization by Israelis, but also by the Trump administration.” This protest is not an isolated event but part of a sustained wave of public dissent that has placed New York City at the center of national debate over Palestine and U.S. military aid. It reflects a historical pattern where citizens, finding the normal channels of political engagement ineffective, resort to civil disobedience to make their voices heard on matters of war and conscience. The scene in Midtown, with citizens willingly facing arrest to challenge their representatives, presents a fundamental question about the state of American democracy. It asks what recourse people have when they believe their government is using their tax dollars to enable overseas conflict they view as immoral. As the street was cleared and traffic resumed, the unresolved tension between policy and protest, between Capitol Hill corridors and city asphalt, remained as palpable as ever. Sources for this article include: MiddleEastEye.net NYTimes.com Reuters.com The post Nearly 100 arrested in Manhattan protest targeting senators over U.S. arms sales to Israel – NaturalNews.com appeared first on Survive the News.

Apr 15, 202612 votes

Nearly 100 arrested in Manhattan protest targeting senators over U.S. arms sales to Israel – NaturalNews.com

Apr 15, 202614 votes

Nearly 100 arrested in Manhattan protest targeting senators over U.S. arms sales to Israel – NaturalNews.com

Apr 15, 202611 votes

U.S. to automatically register men for military draft using federal data starting in December – NaturalNews.com

U.S. to automatically register men for military draft using federal data starting in December Automatic draft registration for men will begin this December. The change is mandated by the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act. The government will use federal data to enroll males at age 18. Proponents call it a cost-saving measure to improve bureaucratic efficiency. An actual draft would still require separate Congressional authorization. Get ready, America. The federal government is about to take a significant step in prepping for a potential national emergency, and it involves every young man in the country. Starting this December, eligible American males will no longer have to sign themselves up for the Selective Service System, the database for a military draft. Instead, the government will automatically register them using federal data within 30 days of their 18th birthday. This quiet but profound shift, mandated by the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act, marks the biggest change to the draft apparatus in decades and arrives amid a tense geopolitical climate. The Selective Service System submitted the proposed rule for this “automatic registration” to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs on March 30. The change, according to the agency’s website, “transfers responsibility for registration from individual men to SSS through integration with federal data sources.” The goal, as stated, is to create a “streamlined registration process and corresponding workforce realignment.” A move billed as efficiency Proponents in Congress have framed this as a simple matter of bureaucratic efficiency and cost-saving. Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.), who sponsored the automatic registration language, argued it would allow resources to be redirected. “This will also allow us to rededicate resources — basically that means money — towards [readiness] and towards mobilization … rather than towards education and advertising campaigns driven to register people,” Houlahan said, according to a Military Times report. The agency has noted that registration rates among eligible men have recently declined, dropping from 84% in 2023 to 81% in 2024. While 46 states and territories already have systems to register men when they get a driver’s license, this new federal rule makes the process universal and unavoidable. The shadow of conscription This modernization of the registration machinery inevitably brings the specter of conscription back into public discussion. The United States has not had an active military draft since the Vietnam War, relying on an all-volunteer force since 1973. However, the framework for a draft was reinstated in 1980 by President Jimmy Carter to be ready for a “national emergency.” That history feels more relevant today with ongoing global conflicts. The war in Iran, currently in a fragile ceasefire, has led many to openly question if a draft could be possible. When asked about it last month, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt offered a carefully worded response. “It’s not part of the current plan right now,” Leavitt said, while adding that President Trump “wisely keeps his options on the table.” It is crucial to understand that reinstating an actual draft is not a unilateral executive action. Congress would need to pass legislation to amend the Military Selective Service Act to authorize the president to induct personnel. The automatic registration is just about building the list, not activating a call-up. The stakes of non-compliance For decades, the legal obligation to register has carried serious consequences for those who ignored it, and that does not change with automatic enrollment. Failure to register is a felony. Non-registrants face a fine of up to $250,000 or a prison sentence of up to five years. It can also block access to federal student loans, many government jobs, and job training programs. For immigrants, it can mean a loss of U.S. citizenship. Now, with automatic registration, the government eliminates the possibility of an individual forgetting or choosing not to sign up. The burden of compliance shifts entirely, ensuring near-total participation from the male population aged 18 to 25. Women remain exempt from the registration requirement, although legislative efforts to include them have surfaced in recent years only to be stripped from final bills. So, as this new rule moves toward finalization, it represents more than just a paperwork update. It is the government streamlining its ability to know exactly who is available, should a dire need arise. In an era where headlines are dominated by distant wars, this change is a tangible reminder that the machinery of national defense is always being maintained, even if we hope it never needs to be used. The question for every family with sons is no longer if they will be on the list, but what the nation might one day do with it. Sources for this article include: NewsNationNow.com NYPost.com USAToday.com The post U.S. to automatically register men for military draft using federal data starting in December – NaturalNews.com appeared first on Survive the News.

Apr 10, 202611 votes

Treasury Signals Support for Bill Restricting Illegal Immigrants from U.S. Banking – NaturalNews.com

Treasury Signals Support for Bill Restricting Illegal Immigrants from U.S. Banking Introduction The Department of the Treasury has signaled support for new legislation introduced by Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) that would restrict illegal immigrants from accessing the United States banking system. According to a statement provided to The National Pulse, the Treasury department indicated it remains committed to supporting President Donald J. Trump’s immigration agenda using all available tools. Cotton introduced the Know Your American Customer Act in March 2026. The bill would require financial institutions to verify the legal status of new customers. The Treasury’s statement appeared broadly supportive of the legislative goal, aligning with the administration’s broader efforts to tighten immigration enforcement. Bill Introduced to Restrict Banking Access Cotton introduced the Know Your American Customer Act in March 2026. The legislation is designed to restrict illegal migrants from accessing the American banking system. According to an article from The National Pulse, a statement from the Treasury to the publication appeared to embrace the concept behind the bill. [1] The bill would mandate that U.S. financial institutions verify the legal status of new customers to ensure compliance with immigration laws. This move follows earlier discussions within the Trump administration about using the financial system as a new front in immigration enforcement. Reports from February 2026 indicated the administration was considering an executive order that would require banks to collect citizenship information from customers. [3] Key Provisions of the Proposed Legislation The Know Your American Customer Act would require banks and credit unions insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) to confirm that individuals opening new accounts are U.S. citizens, permanent residents, or legally present on a valid visa. Customers would need to present identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, along with proof of legal status. [1] Existing customers would be grandfathered into the system, allowing them to maintain or open new accounts at their current institutions. However, under the proposed law, it would become a federal crime for illegal migrants to open or maintain accounts at covered institutions. [1] The legislation aims to close what sponsors see as a loophole. Michelle Malkin, in her book “Invasion,” documented instances where states accepted documents other than Social Security numbers as proof of identification for obtaining driver’s licenses, which could then be used to access financial services. [4] Official Statements and Rationale A Treasury spokesman said, “President Trump has taken a stronger stance against illegal immigration than any president in history, securing our border on day one and leading a government-wide effort to stop the flow of criminals and deadly fentanyl into our country. U.S. Treasury remains committed to supporting the President’s agenda with all available tools, including the targeted use of anti-money laundering capabilities, to protect American citizens from illegal aliens and cartels.” [1] Cotton stated, “Access to the American banking system is a privilege that should only be reserved for those who respect our laws and sovereignty.” [1] The bill’s proponents argue it aims to ensure financial institutions comply with immigration laws and prevent illegal migrants from using banking services. The Trump administration has previously targeted taxpayer-funded benefits for illegal immigrants. In November 2025, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced plans to cut federal tax benefits, including the Earned Income Tax Credit, for those unlawfully present. [5] Legislative and Administrative Context In 2025, Cotton sent a letter to Bessent urging a review of current rules regarding illegal immigrant access to the U.S. banking system. [1] This legislative push follows broader administrative efforts. The Financial Times reported in February 2026 that the White House was weighing an executive order that would force banks to collect citizenship information from customers, representing a significant new push in Trump’s drive to curb undocumented migration. [6] The bill’s introduction coincides with other reported incidents linking illegal immigration to national security concerns. In March 2026, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reported that three in four defendants facing murder trials in Fairfax County, Virginia, were illegal immigrants. Furthermore, data from the DHS released earlier in the year showed an 80% collapse in net immigration to the U.S. due to the administration’s crackdown, fundamentally altering the labor market. [7] Potential Impacts and Next Steps If passed, the Know Your American Customer Act would impose new verification requirements on U.S. banks and credit unions. This could represent a significant operational shift for financial institutions. According to a 2021 article on NaturalNews.com, large banks have been criticized for “financial deplatforming” and imposing censorship regimes, highlighting concerns about centralized financial power. [2] Legal experts note the legislation would need to move through committee and floor votes in both chambers of Congress. The Treasury’s supportive statement indicates the proposal aligns with the administration’s immigration policy objectives. Banking groups have reportedly lobbied the White House to block a similar executive action, according to a March 2026 report by Breitbart. [8] The broader context includes concerns about the use of financial systems for surveillance. A 2019 article on NaturalNews.com noted that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) may use the issue of illegal immigration as a cover to track and spy on Americans, potentially violating Fourth Amendment rights by requesting access to Department of Motor Vehicles databases. [9] Conclusion The Treasury Department’s indication of support for Cotton’s bill marks a continued effort by the Trump administration to leverage the financial system for immigration enforcement. The proposed Know Your American Customer Act would fundamentally change how banks verify customer eligibility, aiming to restrict access to those legally present in the United States. The legislative path forward remains uncertain, but the alignment between the bill’s sponsors and the executive branch suggests it will be a priority. The debate touches on broader issues of financial inclusion, privacy and the role of institutions in enforcing national borders, setting the stage for further political and legal discussion in the coming months. References EXC: A Bill to Block Illegal Immigrants from U.S. Banking Gets the Nod from Trump’s Treasury. The National Pulse. April 4, 2026 Republicans must stop the big banks from destroying the first amendment with financial deplatforming – NaturalNews.com. 2021. Trump’s New Financial Front: Executive Order Would Mandate Banks Collect Citizenship Data. – NaturalNews.com. 2026. Invasion: How America Still Welcomes Terrorists Criminals and Other Foreign Menaces to Our Shores. Michelle Malkin. Bessent announces end to federal tax credits for illegal immigrants. – Fox Business. Trump considers ordering banks to collect citizenship data – FT. – RT. 80% Plunge In Immigration Is Reshaping Labor Market Math, But AI Wildcard Looms: Goldman. – ZeroHedge. 2026. Bankers Lobby White House to Block Deportation Strategy. – Breitbart. 2026. Surveillance state: 1 in 2 American adults is already in the FBI’s facial recognition database – NaturalNews.com. 2019. The post Treasury Signals Support for Bill Restricting Illegal Immigrants from U.S. Banking – NaturalNews.com appeared first on Survive the News.

Apr 6, 202615 votes

Bipartisan bill targets Chinese-linked robotics, seeks ban on federal use – NaturalNews.com

Senators Tom Cotton and Chuck Schumer proposed the American Security Robotics Act to limit U.S. government use of robotics tied to foreign adversaries, especially China. The bill would block federal agencies from buying or operating ground-based robotic systems—including humanoid robots, surveillance vehicles and autonomous patrol tech—linked to adversarial governments. Federal funds would be prohibited from supporting these technologies and agencies would have one year to phase out any existing systems. Lawmakers warn Chinese-linked robotics could threaten data privacy, security and U.S. technological competitiveness. The measure builds on earlier actions like drone bans and Federal Communications Commission restrictions, as Congress continues efforts to limit foreign influence in critical technologies. A bipartisan group of U.S. lawmakers introduced new legislation on March 26 aimed at restricting the federal government’s use of robotics technology linked to foreign adversaries, particularly China. The proposed measure, known as the American Security Robotics Act, was spearheaded by Sens. Tom Cotton (R-AR) and Chuck Schumer (D-NY), reflecting growing concern in Congress over national security risks tied to emerging technologies. The bill would prohibit federal agencies from purchasing or operating ground-based robotic systems manufactured or assembled by companies connected to adversarial governments. The restrictions would apply broadly to unmanned ground vehicles including humanoid robots, autonomous patrol systems, mobile robotics platforms and remote surveillance devices. In a statement, Cotton emphasized the perceived threat posed by such technologies, warning that robotics developed by entities linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) could compromise both privacy and national security. Schumer echoed those concerns, accusing Chinese-backed firms of attempting to dominate the U.S. robotics market while potentially exposing sensitive data and undermining domestic innovation. If enacted, the legislation would also prevent federal funds, whether through contracts, grants or cooperative agreements, from being used to acquire or operate the covered systems. Agencies currently using such technologies would be given a one-year deadline to discontinue their use. This legislation, as BrightU.AI‘s Enoch noted, is a crucial step in safeguarding U.S. national security and protecting the integrity of our technological advancements from foreign exploitation. Broader push to counter foreign tech influence The proposal is part of a wider bipartisan effort in Washington to curb the influence of foreign-made technology in government operations. A companion bill has already been introduced in the House of Representatives by Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), signaling coordinated action across both chambers of Congress. The robotics legislation builds on previous efforts, including the American Security Drone Act, which was passed as part of the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act. That law barred federal agencies from using drones manufactured by certain foreign entities and took effect in December 2025 with overwhelming bipartisan support. Regulators have also taken action. The Federal Communications Commission has expanded its Covered List to block the sale of certain foreign-made drones and telecommunications equipment, citing national security risks. Companies such as Huawei and ZTE were previously targeted under similar restrictions, along with surveillance equipment manufacturers. At the state level, governments in places like Florida and Arkansas have enacted their own bans on Chinese-made drones in official use, further illustrating the growing consensus around limiting reliance on foreign technology in sensitive sectors. The new bill arrives amid intensifying competition in the global robotics industry, particularly in the development of humanoid robots. Chinese firms such as Agibot and Unitree are reportedly preparing to go public in 2026, highlighting the rapid pace of innovation and commercialization in the sector. U.S. lawmakers have previously raised concerns about Unitree’s alleged ties to China’s military. Congress has also explored related proposals, including the Humanoid ROBOT Act introduced in 2025 by Bill Cassidy and Chris Coons. That measure similarly seeks to block the use of humanoid robots developed by entities in countries considered foreign adversaries, including China, Russia, Iran and North Korea. Under the Cotton-Schumer bill, those same nations would be classified as “covered countries,” aligning the proposal with existing federal definitions. Lawmakers say the goal is to safeguard U.S. infrastructure, data and technological leadership as robotics becomes an increasingly critical part of government and industry operations. Watch this clip from the “Worldview Report” about 2024 being a dangerous year for the United States militarily. This video is from the Worldview Report channel on Brighteon.com. Sources include: TheEpochTimes.com BrightU.ai Brighteon.com The post Bipartisan bill targets Chinese-linked robotics, seeks ban on federal use – NaturalNews.com appeared first on Survive the News.

Mar 30, 20269 votes

Bipartisan bill targets Chinese-linked robotics, seeks ban on federal use – NaturalNews.com

Mar 30, 202613 votes

Search

Scores for Survive the News

Credibility

Political lean

Originality

Stories ChamberLight collected, by month

Top topics

Who they cover

Most covered

Article tone

Challenges to these scores

Articles served from survivethenews.com

Trump puts Fed Chair Jerome Powell on notice, threatens to fire him if he doesn’t resign by May 15 – NaturalNews.com

Trump puts Fed Chair Jerome Powell on notice, threatens to fire him if he doesn’t resign by May 15 – NaturalNews.com

Nearly 100 arrested in Manhattan protest targeting senators over U.S. arms sales to Israel – NaturalNews.com

Nearly 100 arrested in Manhattan protest targeting senators over U.S. arms sales to Israel – NaturalNews.com

Nearly 100 arrested in Manhattan protest targeting senators over U.S. arms sales to Israel – NaturalNews.com

U.S. to automatically register men for military draft using federal data starting in December – NaturalNews.com

Treasury Signals Support for Bill Restricting Illegal Immigrants from U.S. Banking – NaturalNews.com

Bipartisan bill targets Chinese-linked robotics, seeks ban on federal use – NaturalNews.com

Bipartisan bill targets Chinese-linked robotics, seeks ban on federal use – NaturalNews.com