Stories credited to Local News 8, by publication date. ChamberLight collects articles that mention the officials it tracks, so this shows its own coverage of this source, not how much the source publishes.

Stories from Local News 8
Shaded: ChamberLight collected no stories, or almost none, from any outlet (a gap in its collection, not in the outlet’s publishing)

Show as a table

Month	Stories	All outlets
April 2026	8	3,219
May 2026	0	none collected
June 2026	0	none collected
July 2026	0	none collected
August 2026	0	1 (collection gap)
September 2026	0	598

Who they cover

Party of the officials these stories are mainly about, across all 9 officials named. A story counts once for each official it is mainly about, so the split is over 12 story–official pairs, from 8 stories.

Democrat50% · 6 pairs
Republican50% · 6 pairs

Most covered

Stories mainly about each official, and their share of the source’s 8 stories.

Article tone

ChamberLight’s article analysis assigns each story a tone toward the official it covers. It describes the coverage of that official, not Local News 8’s stance, and reader votes do not change it. 8 stories.

Good Look: 0 (0%)
Mixed: 4 (50%)
Informational: 2 (25%)
Bad Look: 2 (25%)

Challenges to these scores

No one has challenged a score on this page yet. Anyone can; editors publish every outcome here.

Articles served from localnews8.com

Longtime Georgia Democrat US Rep. David Scott dies at 80

By Veronica Stracqualursi, CNN (CNN) — US Democratic Rep. David Scott, who represented Georgia’s 13th Congressional District, has died at 80 years old. Scott’s death was announced Wednesday on the House floor. The congressman was first elected in 2002 and was running for reelection to a 13th term. Born on a farm in South Carolina, Scott became the first African American to chair the House Agriculture Committee in 2020, when Democrats controlled the chamber. Reflecting on his historic appointment, Scott said in a statement at the time that he was “honored.” “I was born on my grandparents’ farm in rural Aynor, South Carolina, during the days of segregation, and the hardships, of those, on whose shoulders I now stand,” he said. He later served as ranking member on the committee. During his time serving in the US House, the congressman helped secure funding in the 2018 farm bill for agriculture scholarships for students attending historically Black colleges and universities. Before arriving in Washington, Scott was a Georgia state lawmaker and a business owner. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle praised Scott’s long tenure in Congress and expressed sadness over his death. Speaker Mike Johnson wrote on X, “We are all deeply saddened by the news of Rep. David Scott’s passing. For more than two decades, David faithfully served the people of Georgia’s 13th Congressional District and spent the majority of his life in service to others.” The House Agriculture Committee’s top Democrat, Rep. Angie Craig, remembered Scott as “a strong voice for Georgia’s farmers, hungry veterans and young people.” This story has been updated with additional information. The-CNN-Wire ™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Apr 22, 202617 votes

Virginia voters to decide on new House map with major midterm implications

CNN By Jeff Zeleny, CNN (CNN) — Virginia is the latest front in an unprecedented coast-to-coast redistricting war, with voters on Tuesday set to determine whether to accept or reject a Democratic plan to dramatically redraw the state’s congressional maps and help shape the midterm elections. Nearly 1.4 million Virginians have already cast early ballots, a sign of remarkable interest for an April special election, ahead of Tuesday’s final day of voting. If enacted, the plan could help Democrats win 10 of the state’s 11 congressional districts – a major shift from the current balance of six seats held by Democrats and five by Republicans. “We didn’t start this fight, but I’m saying to Virginia, we need to finish it,” Delores McQuinn, a Democratic member of the House of Delegates, told CNN at a rally in the final days of the redistricting campaign. “We can help level the playing field.” Virginia is one of the final chapters in a redistricting arms race that President Donald Trump started last year in Texas when he said Republicans were “entitled to five more seats.” California Democrats responded, along with a handful of other states, in a tit-for-tat that has ultimately yielded nine more Republican-friendly seats and six that favor Democrats. “What’s happening now is the most blatant power grab that has ever been demonstrated,” said Glenn Youngkin, a former Virginia governor and a leading Republican voice against the measure, who avoided mention of how Texas kicked off the rare mid-decade redistricting fight. Democrats have raised more than twice as much money than Republicans in the closely watched contest that could help determine which party controls Congress after the fall elections. On advertising alone, Democrats have spent $55 million, according to AdImpact, compared to $23 million for Republicans. Despite the wide disparity, Democrats acknowledge that victory is far from certain, saying turnout on Election Day will be critical. Republicans share that sentiment and believe creating a 10-1 advantage for Democrats is at odds with the electorate in a state former Vice President Kamala Harris won with nearly 52% of the vote in 2024. Here are a few dynamics at play – for Virginia and the nation. High stakes for Democrats For Democrats, the stakes in Virginia are remarkably high. So, too, are the rewards. If the referendum succeeds Tuesday night, the party suddenly has more breathing room in its quest to win control of the US House in the midterm elections. The national political winds already favor Democrats this year, but a Virginia victory would super-charge their prospects. “They thought that Democrats were going to step back,” House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries told supporters during a rally in the final days of the campaign. “Well, we’re making clear we’re not here to step back. We’re here to fight back.” On the eve of the election, Jeffries told reporters: “It’s gonna be close because Virginia is a purple state.” Jeffries has been at the center of the Democratic strategy in Virginia, a plan that has long worried some state party leaders as a potential overreach. His comments Monday underscore how cautiously Democrats are eyeing — and lowering expectations for — the special election, which comes five months after the party swept the Virginia governor’s race by 15 percentage points last fall. But if Democrats win in November, Jeffries stands the most to gain – likely becoming House Speaker, a fact he rarely mentions, but one that his Republican rivals point out again and again. “Do you want to see Speaker Hakeem Jeffries?” Speaker Mike Johnson said as he rallied Republican opposition to the referendum, trying to use Jeffries as a motivating force by sounding the alarm about the prospect of the GOP losing its majority next year. Trump, Obama loom large The president has been a dominating factor in the race, but nearly an absent one. Aside from a tele-rally on the eve of the election, Trump played little hands-on role in the GOP campaign urging Virginians to vote against the referendum. “The whole country is watching it’s so important and so unfair what they’ve done,” Trump said in brief remarks Monday evening. “We need every Virginia patriot to get out and vote no, no, no on the radical Democrats’ unfair ballot referendum.” Yet he played a central part on the Democratic side, with his name repeatedly invoked to raise enthusiasm among Trump critics. “Voting yes will stop Donald Trump’s scheme to rig the midterm elections,” Rep. Jennifer McClellan, a Virginia Democrat, told supporters at a rally in Richmond. “Voting yes will stop the MAGA power grab.” With the midterm elections a little more than six months away, Tuesday’s outcome could offer fresh clues for which side Trump motivates more – Republicans or Democrats. Former President Barack Obama has also been at the center of the Virginia race – featured in ads on both sides – as Democrats have called on him to rally the party’s base even as Republicans have seized on his previous comments speaking against gerrymandering. “By voting yes, you can push back against the Republicans trying to give themselves an unfair advantage in the midterms,” Obama said in a video released Friday, which aides said was intended to clear up any confusion. “By voting yes, you can take a temporary step to level the playing field.” Groups opposing the redistricting effort have featured some of Obama’s past criticisms of gerrymandering, including this sentiment aimed at independent voters in TV ads and mailers: “Because of things like political gerrymandering, our parties have moved further and further apart and it’s harder and harder to find common ground.” National implications, but local elections The national implications of the Virginia referendum are clear, given the narrow GOP majority in the House and the redistricting battle playing out across the country for nearly a year. But the race could also hinge on far more local concerns, including those of rural voters like Tara Bowman of Woodstock. She lives about 90 minutes away from the Washington suburbs of Fairfax and McLean, with whom she has no interest in sharing a member of Congress. “I think the new map is absolutely horrible,” Bowman said. “I do not want my congressman to be from Fairfax. No, no, no, no.” To produce a 10-1 advantage in the state’s congressional delegation, Virginia Democrats are proposing a new map that would carve up deep blue districts in northern Virginia and around Richmond, while creating a new district along the Blue Ridge Mountains that connects several college towns. The constitutional amendment on the ballot Tuesday would allow lawmakers to redraw the state’s congressional map before the November elections, returning the authority of drawing districts to a redistricting commission in 2031 following the next census. If voters reject the referendum, the current map with its 6-to-5 split in favor of Democrats remains in place – and campaigns for those seats will begin in earnest. For all the national implications hanging over the race, including a question of which party should control Congress in November, the decisions voters make on Tuesday will be done far closer to home. CNN’s David Wright contributed to this report. The-CNN-Wire ™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Apr 22, 202614 votes

Virginia voters to decide on new House map with major midterm implications

Apr 22, 202618 votes

On Capitol Hill, RFK Jr. defends vaccine policies, ongoing shakeups

By Sarah Owermohle, Tami Luhby, CNN (CNN) — US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had another long day on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, with lawmakers questioning him on his vaccine views, agency shakeups and a proposed budget that would slash HHS spending on medical research and public health. The secretary made his fourth and fifth appearances before congressional committees in less than a week, testifying before a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee before heading to a Senate Appropriations subcommittee. As he had in three-hour sessions last week, Kennedy defended the administration’s budget proposal and his reforms. But he also faced some fresh questions, namely about President Donald Trump’s new pick to lead the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — and whether the White House has sought to rope in his vaccine rhetoric. Kennedy will testify before two more Senate committees on Wednesday; the afternoon session, with the Senate Health Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, is expected to be the highest-profile hearing of the marathon stretch. Here are the highlights from Kennedy’s third day of budget discussions on Capitol Hill. Grilled on CDC pick Trump named a nominee to lead the beleaguered CDC on Thursday, nearly eight months after the administration ousted Dr. Susan Monarez from the role over her refusal to rubber-stamp Kennedy’s vaccine decisions. The nominee, Dr. Erica Schwartz, is a veteran of public health service and served as deputy surgeon general in the president’s first administration. Her nomination was met with cautious support from public health advocates, who questioned whether she would be allowed to lead the agency without interference. Rep. Raul Ruiz had similar questions at Tuesday’s hearing. The California Democrat pressed Kennedy on what drove Monarez’s firing and whether Schwartz would meet the same pressure. “Mr. Secretary, if Dr. Schwartz is confirmed, will you commit on the record today to implement whatever vaccine guidance she issues without interference?” Ruiz asked. Kennedy replied: “I’m not going to make that kind of commitment.” Kennedy also denied that Monarez was fired because of clashes over vaccine policy, saying — as he has before — that the scientist told him she was untrustworthy. Monarez denied that version of events in a Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee hearing in September. The issue — and Schwartz’s autonomy if confirmed — is certain to come up in that committee’s hearing Wednesday, since that panel holds the votes to confirm health care nominees like the CDC director. Vaccines and measles outbreak remain a focus Kennedy could not escape questions Tuesday about his stance on vaccine safety and how that may have fueled a sharp rise in measles cases in the US. As in earlier hearings, the secretary denied that his vaccine views played a role in declining vaccination rates and disputed that he has been anti-vaccine. “The problem is not me. There are people in this country who do not vaccinate,” Kennedy said during the House hearing. US cases of measles surged to a record high in 2025; the government has recorded more than 1,700 cases so far this year. Amid questions about vaccine policy changes — such as a proposal to delay hepatitis B vaccination from infancy to age 12 — Kennedy insisted that he is not against vaccines but wants more safety studies. Vaccines are tested in some of the largest clinical trials of pharmaceutical products, often involving millions of trial participants. They are also continuously monitored for safety after approval. Rates of hepatitis B fell dramatically since the first vaccine launched more than four decades ago, but federal data suggests that there were more than 2,000 new cases in the US last year. Another HHS expert shakeup Kennedy also indicated that he is soliciting new members for a key panel of agency advisers: the US Preventive Services Task Force, which recommends screenings for cancer, diabetes and heart diseases, behavioral counseling and other preventive care. Under the Affordable Care Act, insurers must cover preventive services that get an A or B grade from the group at no cost to patients. “One of the things that we’re working on right now is to reform the United States Preventive Service Task Force,” he told the House committee, adding that a notice will be put in the Federal Register this week. “That task force has been lackadaisical. It’s not been doing its job. If it had been doing its job, we would have early screening for Alzheimer’s.” The task force has not met for more than a year and has been unable to advance recommendations that are under review or in development, concerning many preventive care experts. Five of its 16 members’ terms expired on January 1. The USPSTF shakeup comes after Kennedy overhauled the agency’s highest-profile vaccine advisory group, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Kennedy, a longtime vaccine skeptic, replaced all of the committee’s members last year. The new panel voted to abandon universal hepatitis B vaccination for newborns; placed restrictions on a combination shot that protects against chickenpox as well as measles, mumps and rubella; and took the unprecedented step of not universally recommending Covid-19 vaccinations, instead making it a matter of personal choice. ‘There have been no cuts to Medicaid’ After being hammered by several Democratic lawmakers about the Trump administration’s cuts to Medicaid, Kennedy insisted that no cuts are taking place. Kennedy repeatedly said across several hearings that “there have been no cuts to Medicaid,” insisting that any loss of coverage was for ineligible people such as illegal immigrants. He pointed on Tuesday to a Congressional Budget Office report that he argued shows federal spending on the critical safety net program would increase in coming years. Federal spending on Medicaid is forecast to grow from $708 billion this year to $941 billion in 2035, according to the CBO’s latest projection. But it would have increased even more had congressional Republicans not approved the One Big Beautiful Bill Act last summer – to just over $1 trillion in 2035, the CBO estimated prior to the law’s enactment. The “big, beautiful bill” – which implements the first-ever work requirement in Medicaid and limits states’ ability to finance the program, among other changes – is expected to slash spending on Medicaid by a total of $1.2 trillion between 2026 and 2035, the CBO projected. The historic cut means the safety net program won’t be able to keep up with costs, which could force states to further restrict eligibility or benefits, experts have said. The Republican package is expected to reduce Medicaid enrollment by 13.1 million people in 2035, the CBO estimates. Questions about maternal and women’s health persist Maternal health care and the country’s high rate of maternal deaths — particularly among Black women — have been a contentious point between Kennedy and Democrats since the first hearings last week. Lawmakers including Pennsylvania Rep. Summer Lee have pressed Kennedy on how cuts to diversity, equity and inclusion programs have affected efforts to address those disparities. On Tuesday, Maine Republican Susan Collins joined those lawmakers. “It appears that the administration is looking at these health disparities and is not looking at them — is pulling back from these grants instead of figuring out why these health disparities exist and how to address them,” Collins said. Kennedy has maintained that this administration has made the most improvements to maternal health programs in history. “You’re right, we have the worst maternal health outcomes of any of the Western countries, and Black women are 2.6 times more likely” to die in pregnancy and childbirth than White women, Kennedy said Tuesday. He pointed to a perinatal pilot program that he said has reduced the rate of maternal mortality by 42%. When asked about that reduction, HHS directed CNN to a report that found a 41.5% decline in deaths during hospital stays for childbirth among 250 hospitals over several years, through a program started in 2020. Lee had asked Friday what share of that drop had been among Black women. “It helps everybody,” Kennedy said. The war in Iran Over the course of this month’s HHS budget hearings, three Democrats have pulled the health secretary into questions about the ongoing war in Iran, questioning both the cost of the war and President Donald Trump’s mental acuity. “In Trump’s America, we can’t afford health care, but apparently we can spend a billion dollars a day in a war with Iran,” said Frank Pallone of New Jersey, ranking member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, on Tuesday. “Do you believe that further cuts to health care programs, including Medicare, Medicaid and the ACA, are necessary in order to pay for Trump’s ongoing war with Iran?” Kennedy again said there have been no Medicaid cuts. A particularly heated exchange came Friday, when Rep. Mark Takano, a Democrat from California, read out Trump’s social media posts about Iran and asked Kennedy if he was mentally fit for office. “The president is a bargainer, and he knows how to make good deals,” Kennedy said. He later told the committee that Trump is “very, very sane.” The-CNN-Wire ™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Apr 21, 202617 votes

Feud between Mace and Mills flares as the Republicans trade barbs, expulsion threats

By Sarah Ferris, Ellis Kim, CNN (CNN) — A deeply personal grudge between a pair of Republicans — Reps. Cory Mills of Florida and Nancy Mace of South Carolina — has escalated on Capitol Hill, as Mills accused his long-time foe of trying to profit off efforts to oust him. The spat between the two firebrand conservatives is gaining traction in the halls of Congress and online among the MAGA base at a precarious time for President Donald Trump’s party. GOP leadership is already struggling to keep its razor-thin majority on track to advance key priorities — and needs every one of its Republican seats. While Mills and Mace have traded personal barbs for years, some of their more serious threats in recent days could jeopardize the fragile GOP unity in Congress. The two have floated bringing dueling expulsion measures — the most severe consequence possible for a member of Congress — in direct defiance of GOP leaders’ pleas to keep the peace in their party. Speaker Mike Johnson, who governs the House with just a two-vote margin, made clear to reporters Monday evening that he did not support members of his party going after each other. “It is not something I encourage, no. Look, we have a process here,” Johnson said, adding later: “So no, I’m not in favor.” Mills has since backed down from his threat to force an ouster vote against Mace — but Mace has only appeared to embrace the stand-off, telling CNN: “Bring it on.” If a vote takes place, it could cause ugly divisions in the narrowly divided House GOP, with significant implications for Johnson’s tiny majority. Asked about Mace’s expulsion push on Tuesday, Mills dismissed it as “political theatrics for fundraising,” lashing out at Mace for singling him out for allegations that he said have never been proven by a court or an independent watchdog. He went directly after the congresswoman, calling her out for “always creating drama” with the intent of raising money, but then not following through with her threats. Mace is currently threatening to force a vote to expel Mills on the floor, but she has not yet triggered it. “If you’re going to file a resolution, why not call it a privileged motion where you can actually put it on the floor for a vote? Why just fundraise off of it?” Mills said of Mace. CNN has reached out to Mace for comment on the fundraising allegation. A Defiant Mills says he won’t resign Mills told CNN on Tuesday he would not resign from Congress, despite calls from some in his own party to step down amid questions over sexual misconduct and other allegations. “There’s absolutely no reason to resign,” he told CNN, adding that Johnson has told him in conversations not to. “He told me not to resign, and he told me that this is why we have this process.” The speaker would not confirm the exchange directly, but he insisted Mills should be afforded due process. “Cory Mills is going through the same due process that was afforded to Cherfilus-McCormick and anyone else who has allegations made against them,” the speaker said. “I’ve asked and answered this question a thousand times. He is in the middle of an Ethics Committee process and so everyone is due the opportunity to present their defenses and go through that.” He also wouldn’t say directly whether he will support Mills’ reelection bid, though he noted he views himself “in charge” of reelecting GOP incumbents. “He’s an incumbent and I’m in charge of getting all the incumbents — Republican incumbents reelected, and so – of course, that was all done well before any of these allegations were coming out. But he has the right to answer to the allegations, and that’s what they’re doing,” Johnson said. He said he would no longer comment on Mills, telling reporters, “I’m done commenting on it. I can’t. The speaker of the House does not put a thumb on the scale for the Ethics Committee investigation.” The Ethics Committee is currently looking into multiple allegations made against Mills, including campaign finance violations and sexual misconduct. The Florida congressman has also been under investigation by DC police for allegedly assaulting an individual. He was also previously ordered by a judge not to have any contact with an ex-girlfriend, who accused the congressman of having threatened to release sexually explicit images and videos of her after their relationship ended. Mills has repeatedly denied all of the allegations against him, remaining defiant amid renewed scrutiny. “I can tell you that there’s no open criminal or civil case against me, nothing. I’ve never been arrested and/or charged with anything that’s criminal and or civil. I have no federal indictments or anything for alleged federal fraud. … And I’ve never had any type of sexual misconduct or inappropriate behavior that involves staff or Hill and things like this,” the Florida congressman said Tuesday of the myriad allegations he’s facing. It’s not clear yet whether Mace’s push will meet the high bar for expulsion, which requires two-thirds of members to support it. But some key Republicans told CNN on Tuesday they’re not ruling it out. GOP Rep. Lauren Boebert left the door open to voting to expel Mills, one of the remaining lawmakers under review by the House Ethics Committee following a series of resignations in the past week. She told CNN that she would want to weigh the details of a resolution to expel him if it comes to the floor. Mills repeatedly bristled at being lumped together with the three lawmakers who recently resigned from the House in disgrace — former Reps. Eric Swalwell, Tony Gonzales, and Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick — and who faced calls for their expulsion this month before they stepped down. He argued the investigation is different and stressed that he is fully cooperating with the House Ethics Committee. “This is political tit for tat. If one goes, they want another one to go. I’m not in the category of Swalwell, a Gonzales, and or a Cherfilus-McCormick,” he said. He added that he and his lawyers have so far turned over many “documents” to the ethics panel but did not have any insight into how much longer that probe could last. “Whether you’re the speaker, minority leader, whatever, no one has that level of visibility. All I can say is, everything they’ve asked of us, we’ve compiled,” he said. This story has been updated with additional details. The-CNN-Wire ™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved. CNN’s Manu Raju, Alison Main, Kendall Wright and Arpita Dasika contributed to this report.

Apr 21, 202613 votes

Feud between Mace and Mills flares as the Republicans trade barbs, expulsion threats

Apr 21, 202614 votes

Feud between Mace and Mills flares as the Republicans trade barbs, expulsion threats

Apr 21, 202618 votes

Virginia voters to decide on new House map with major midterm implications

By Jeff Zeleny, CNN (CNN) — Virginia is the latest front in an unprecedented coast-to-coast redistricting war, with voters on Tuesday set to determine whether to accept or reject a Democratic plan to dramatically redraw the state’s congressional maps and help shape the midterm elections. Nearly 1.4 million Virginians have already cast early ballots, a sign of remarkable interest for an April special election. The final day of voting is Tuesday, with polls open from 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. ET, on a plan that could help Democrats win 10 of the state’s 11 congressional districts – a major shift from the current balance of six seats held by Democrats and five by Republicans. “We didn’t start this fight, but I’m saying to Virginia, we need to finish it,” Delores McQuinn, a Democratic member of the House of Delegates, told CNN at a rally in the final days of the redistricting campaign. “We can help level the playing field.” Virginia is one of the final chapters in a redistricting arms race that President Donald Trump started last year in Texas when he said Republicans were “entitled to five more seats.” California Democrats responded, along with a handful of other states, in a tit-for-tat that has ultimately yielded nine more Republican-friendly seats and six that favor Democrats. “What’s happening now is the most blatant power grab that has ever been demonstrated,” said Glenn Youngkin, a former Virginia governor and a leading Republican voice against the measure, who avoided mention of how Texas kicked off the rare mid-decade redistricting fight. Democrats have raised more than twice as much money than Republicans in the closely watched contest that could help determine which party controls Congress after the fall elections. On advertising alone, Democrats have spent $55 million, according to AdImpact, compared to $23 million for Republicans. Despite the wide disparity, Democrats acknowledge that victory is far from certain, saying turnout on Election Day will be critical. Republicans share that sentiment and believe creating a 10-1 advantage for Democrats is at odds with the electorate in a state former Vice President Kamala Harris won with nearly 52% of the vote in 2024. Here are a few dynamics at play – for Virginia and the nation. High stakes for Democrats For Democrats, the stakes in Virginia are remarkably high. So, too, are the rewards. If the referendum succeeds Tuesday night, the party suddenly has more breathing room in its quest to win control of the US House in the midterm elections. The national political winds already favor Democrats this year, but a Virginia victory would super-charge their prospects. “They thought that Democrats were going to step back,” House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries told supporters during a rally in the final days of the campaign. “Well, we’re making clear we’re not here to step back. We’re here to fight back.” On the eve of the election, Jeffries told reporters: “It’s gonna be close because Virginia is a purple state.” Jeffries has been at the center of the Democratic strategy in Virginia, a plan that has long worried some state party leaders as a potential overreach. His comments Monday underscore how cautiously Democrats are eyeing — and lowering expectations for — the special election, which comes five months after the party swept the Virginia governor’s race by 15 percentage points last fall. But if Democrats win in November, Jeffries stands the most to gain – likely becoming House Speaker, a fact he rarely mentions, but one that his Republican rivals point out again and again. “Do you want to see Speaker Hakeem Jeffries?” Speaker Mike Johnson said as he rallied Republican opposition to the referendum, trying to use Jeffries as a motivating force by sounding the alarm about the prospect of the GOP losing its majority next year. Trump, Obama loom large The president has been a dominating factor in the race, but nearly an absent one. Aside from a tele-rally on the eve of the election, Trump played little hands-on role in the GOP campaign urging Virginians to vote against the referendum. “The whole country is watching it’s so important and so unfair what they’ve done,” Trump said in brief remarks Monday evening. “We need every Virginia patriot to get out and vote no, no, no on the radical Democrats’ unfair ballot referendum.” Yet he played a central part on the Democratic side, with his name repeatedly invoked to raise enthusiasm among Trump critics. “Voting yes will stop Donald Trump’s scheme to rig the midterm elections,” Rep. Jennifer McClellan, a Virginia Democrat, told supporters at a rally in Richmond. “Voting yes will stop the MAGA power grab.” With the midterm elections a little more than six months away, Tuesday’s outcome could offer fresh clues for which side Trump motivates more – Republicans or Democrats. Former President Barack Obama has also been at the center of the Virginia race – featured in ads on both sides – as Democrats have called on him to rally the party’s base even as Republicans have seized on his previous comments speaking against gerrymandering. “By voting yes, you can push back against the Republicans trying to give themselves an unfair advantage in the midterms,” Obama said in a video released Friday, which aides said was intended to clear up any confusion. “By voting yes, you can take a temporary step to level the playing field.” Groups opposing the redistricting effort have featured some of Obama’s past criticisms of gerrymandering, including this sentiment aimed at independent voters in TV ads and mailers: “Because of things like political gerrymandering, our parties have moved further and further apart and it’s harder and harder to find common ground.” National implications, but local elections The national implications of the Virginia referendum are clear, given the narrow GOP majority in the House and the redistricting battle playing out across the country for nearly a year. But the race could also hinge on far more local concerns, including those of rural voters like Tara Bowman of Woodstock. She lives about 90 minutes away from the Washington suburbs of Fairfax and McLean, with whom she has no interest in sharing a member of Congress. “I think the new map is absolutely horrible,” Bowman said. “I do not want my congressman to be from Fairfax. No, no, no, no.” To produce a 10-1 advantage in the state’s congressional delegation, Virginia Democrats are proposing a new map that would carve up deep blue districts in northern Virginia and around Richmond, while creating a new district along the Blue Ridge Mountains that connects several college towns. The constitutional amendment on the ballot Tuesday would allow lawmakers to redraw the state’s congressional map before the November elections, returning the authority of drawing districts to a redistricting commission in 2031 following the next census. If voters reject the referendum, the current map with its 6-to-5 split in favor of Democrats remains in place – and campaigns for those seats will begin in earnest. For all the national implications hanging over the race, including a question of which party should control Congress in November, the decisions voters make on Tuesday will be done far closer to home. CNN’s David Wright contributed to this report. The-CNN-Wire ™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Apr 21, 202620 votes

Virginia voters to decide on new House map with major midterm implications

Apr 21, 202614 votes

How a must-win Michigan Senate race turned messy for Democrats

By Manu Raju, Alison Main, CNN (CNN) — Sitting in a coffee shop in his hometown of Ann Arbor, Abdul El-Sayed is ready to dispel the notion that he’s unelectable. The 41-year-old son of Egyptian immigrants whose sharply progressive views align with those of Sen. Bernie Sanders, El-Sayed is seen by many Democrats in Washington as the kind of candidate they fear: someone who wins a primary and loses in November, costing them a shot at the Senate majority. El-Sayed scoffs at that. “I think there is this notion that electability is about being the least offensive,” he told CNN. “If that were true, why would Donald Trump have won the presidency twice?” Whether he’s right could have enormous ramifications for control of the Senate. Michigan’s open Senate seat is now emerging as a GOP hedge against a potential takeover for Democrats, who need to net four seats to flip the chamber. Losing Michigan would make the Democrats’ task almost impossible, a major reason why a leading Republican outside group just announced plans to pour $45 million into the state – more than any other pickup opportunity – to boost former Rep. Mike Rogers, the likely GOP nominee. Republicans are hoping that the ultimate Democratic nominee emerging from the August 4 primary emerges battered and cash-strapped, giving Rogers a leg up. “If he wins this seat, if they are successful in trying to buy this seat, then there is no path at all for Democrats to take control of the US Senate,” said state Sen. Mallory McMorrow, one of the three Democrats vying for the party’s nomination. Yet Democrats have to resolve their own internal struggles first. Rep. Haley Stevens, a 42-year-old who represents a district in the Detroit suburbs, is a favorite among many in the party establishment who see her as the most electable. The 39-year-old McMorrow is trying to brand herself as a candidate who can woo both traditional Democrats and progressives hungry for a shakeup of their party’s leadership. El-Sayed, a former public health official who wrote a book on Medicare for All, is pushing to the left on several key issues. The thorny questions facing Democratic voters: Should they back a candidate certain to energize their progressive base? Or should they fall in line behind the party establishment and pick someone who might better woo swing voters? “Anybody committed to shutting down Trump and the MAGA movement,” said Jeff Albright, an undecided Democratic voter in the Detroit suburb of Canton, when asked about his most important issue. “That’s No. 1.” The splits within the party The fight so far has revealed huge splits among Michigan Democrats over major issues – on immigration enforcement, health care, support for Israel and the state of their party’s leadership. El-Sayed has called to abolish US Immigration and Customs Enforcement while Stevens and McMorrow want changes to ICE’s practices instead. El-Sayed has sworn off any corporate PAC money while Stevens continues to accept PAC funding, despite her calls to overturn the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling. While McMorrow now bans corporate donations to her campaign, it’s a shift from her position accepting them when running for state Senate, something she says shows she’s “willing to be someone who evolves” and has now learned how to campaign “differently.” “We can’t be Republican-light,” McMorrow said in an interview at a brewery in the Detroit suburbs. El-Sayed attacked McMorrow for “a flip” in positions. “It’s not just your positions, it’s about whether or not you truly and deeply hold on to them,” El-Sayed said before pointing to Sen. John Fetterman, the Pennsylvania Democrat who has broken with his party and become a villain on the left. “I think so many of us are frustrated by the likes of John Fetterman, a guy who campaigned saying that he was going to take on the swamp, only to become the ogre who lives in the swamp.” El-Sayed bashed both his Democratic foes for a “lack of courage.” “It’s just the same lack of courage that Democrats deploy to argue as to why they should be taking money from corporations, or why they should be hedging their bets on clear, obvious policies like abolishing ICE or guaranteeing health care through Medicare for All,” he said. “What you’re seeing in this race right now is that people are sick and tired of the same old Democrats who lack courage.” McMorrow said a lot of El-Sayed’s campaign is just rhetoric. “Rhetoric is nice, but results are better,” said McMorrow, who is the state Senate Democratic whip. “Just doing rounds and talking about issues and having rhetoric without knowing how to actually implement those things is not going to shake it up at all. That’s just lobbing bombs from the outside.” Asked if she thought El-Sayed would get trounced by Republicans in a general election, Stevens instead focused on her own campaign and her economic message, arguing that she’s “the best person or the only person that can beat Mike Rogers.” How they’d work with their party’s Senate leader also is a flashpoint. Stevens, who has praised Sen. Chuck Schumer as a “great leader” in the past, wouldn’t say if she stood by those comments when asked by CNN, calling it “inside baseball.” El-Sayed said Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland should be the next Democratic leader, as he bashed Schumer over his stance of providing aid to Israel. McMorrow also said it’s time for a change. “We need new leadership,” she said. “Because if you look at polling, the only thing less popular than Donald Trump is the Democratic Party,” McMorrow said. “That’s rough. So we need to run very different Democrats.” The Israel divide There’s perhaps no bigger dividing line in Michigan or national Democratic politics than Israel. There are sizable Arab American and Jewish voter blocs in and around Detroit. Trump flipped Michigan in November 2024 in part by appealing to both Muslims and Jews disaffected by former President Joe Biden’s handling of the Israel-Hamas war. El-Sayed makes no bones about his views, attacking the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, calling Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a “war criminal,” and referring to Israel’s military campaign in Gaza after Hamas’ October 7 attacks as a “genocide.” Asked if he thinks Israel is as evil as Hamas, El-Sayed said: “Yes. Killing tens of thousands of people makes you pretty damn evil,” he said. “It’s not how evil is this one versus that one: Hamas evil, Israeli government evil. You can say both.” Stevens has the backing of AIPAC, something El-Sayed says is “disastrous for our politics.” “We’re running for Senate for Michigan, and as a senator from Michigan, you should be more interested in what’s happening in Michigan than you are interested in what’s happening in Tel Aviv,” El-Sayed said. Stevens wouldn’t say when asked if she embraced AIPAC’s support. “I’m campaigning in a grassroots way alongside a ton of engaged Michiganders,” she said when asked about AIPAC, saying voters were asking her about their high energy costs. Last year, a United Nations inquiry concluded that Israel had committed genocide against Palestinians in Gaza – an accusation the Israeli government firmly rejects, as does Stevens. “I don’t agree with that,” Stevens said when asked if it were a genocide. McMorrow first notably characterized the Israeli military action in Gaza as a “genocide” when pressed on the issue at a campaign event last fall, though she told voters that the definition of the conflict matters less than reaching a “solution.” She also made clear she would not seek the support of AIPAC, as she faced scrutiny for a Drop Site News report saying she had produced a candidate position paper for the pro-Israel group, according to a campaign call with donors. And on Friday, McMorrow posted on X: “I have not, am not, and will not take money from AIPAC.” Asked by CNN if she believes Netanyahu is a war criminal, McMorrow said: “Watching the devastation, I do believe that war crimes were committed.” The Piker rallies Both McMorrow and Stevens criticized El-Sayed for barnstorming college campuses with left-wing streamer Hasan Piker, who has a history of inflammatory comments, including saying Hamas is “a thousand times better” than Israel and saying “America deserved 9/11.” Piker has walked back the remarks about September 11, but Stevens seized upon them. “That’s not someone I’d be campaigning with,” Stevens said. “Because it’s un-American and we shouldn’t say that America deserved 9/11. This is about winning for Michigan.” El-Sayed took umbrage at Stevens’ criticism. “My understanding of America is, it’s a place where we’re willing to have conversations with folks with whom we disagree,” El-Sayed said. El-Sayed added: “It’s that penchant for cancel culture that I think people hate about Democrats. We sit here from on high and then scold people about who they’re allowed to talk to and who they’re not.” One Democratic voter in Lansing says she would not vote for El-Sayed if he became the nominee, citing in particular his position on Israel. “I don’t want somebody who’s going to pander to whatever is the ‘omnicause’ of the day,” said Robin Gillis, a Stevens supporter. “I want someone who is normal about it. I’m a normal Democrat. I want to vote for a normal Democrat.” Are swing voters ‘mythical’? Earlier this month at Michigan State University, hundreds of students lined up for a chance to hear from both Piker and El-Sayed, with many college-age voters citing the candidate’s staunchly progressive and anti-Israel views. Nick Coffin-Callis, a Democratic voter in Lansing, noted El-Sayed’s support for Medicare for All and free childcare as well as his opposition to Israel. Those views, even if they propel him to a primary victory, could give Rogers and his well-funded allies material for attack ads that national Democrats fear. But when asked if El-Sayed’s ideas would put off swing voters in this purple state, Coffin-Callis demurred in a way that captures the progressive base’s current mood. “I think these swing voters in the center are mythical creatures,” Coffin-Callis said. “I don’t think they necessarily exist.” The-CNN-Wire ™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Apr 19, 202615 votes

How a must-win Michigan Senate race turned messy for Democrats

Apr 19, 20269 votes

How a must-win Michigan Senate race turned messy for Democrats

Apr 19, 20269 votes

High gas prices become another midterm warning sign for Republicans

By Arit John, CNN (CNN) — In a midterm election that will likely be decided by how voters feel about the economy, Republicans are grappling with how to discuss the war in Iran and its impact on fuel costs. Republicans had spent the weeks before the war touting lower prices under President Donald Trump. Now, with the national average for gas rising above $4 a gallon for the first time since 2022 and Trump’s economic approval ratings hitting a record low, Democrats are seeking to tie the war to their broader affordability message, arguing that Republicans are more focused on foreign affairs than reducing costs at home. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, House Democrats’ campaign arm, started running digital ads last month in all of their 44 target districts blaming congressional Republicans for higher gas prices. Some Democratic candidates like Janelle Stelson, who is seeking a rematch against Rep. Scott Perry, a Pennsylvania Republican, have taken their message directly to the voters at gas stations in the districts they seek to represent. “We should be spending money at home, not $1 billion a day for a war in Iran,” Stelson told CNN in an interview. “Meantime, you have everybody here in central Pennsylvania saying, ‘Look at me. I need help. I could use a little, teeny piece of that money.’” (The Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington, DC-based think tank, has estimated the war costs more than $890 million a day.) Perry’s campaign did not respond to requests from CNN. But the congressman told City & State Pennsylvania that he hoped to see gas prices fall soon. “Like so many citizens across our region and nation, I want gas prices to come down, and I understand firsthand the strain these high prices put on families,” Perry said in a statement to the outlet. “It’s everyone’s goal that resolution will be brought to the War in Iran soon, so we can be rid of the threat of a nuclear Iran and energy prices can return to pre-war levels.” Oil prices dropped Friday after Trump and Iran announced the Strait of Hormuz is open to commercial vessels for the remainder of the ceasefire between the two nations. “I think a lot of Republicans are breathing a sigh of relief that this episode is winding down,” said Alex Conant, a Republican strategist. “Trump was elected to tame inflation and create jobs, and if he can show progress on that before the midterms, Republicans will be in much better shape.” Republicans have argued that higher gas prices are temporary – even though gas prices tend to shoot up quickly when oil becomes more expensive and take longer to fall when oil prices decline. Analysts say that high gas prices will linger even after the military conflict ends. The House GOP’s campaign arm also points to policies like tax breaks on tips that it says have boosted incomes. “After years of Democrats’ reckless policies that drove up costs to record levels, voters see the difference and trust Republicans to keep the economy moving in the right direction,” Mike Marinella, a spokesperson for the National Republican Congressional Committee, said in a statement. Searching for the right message Democrats note that lower oil prices don’t necessarily mean voters will feel that at the pump and prices in other sectors are high. “No matter how hard they try, there is absolutely no way for congressional Republicans to outrun the political albatross that their broken promises on affordability have become when the midterms arrive, and voters reject them,” Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesperson Viet Shelton said in a statement. Throughout the war, Democrats have zeroed in on comments their Republican opponents have made seeking to justify the war or urging Americans to endure higher gas prices temporarily. In Minnesota, Republican Senate candidate Michele Tafoya encouraged Americans to “keep a stiff upper lip.” “Maybe you take one less trip to Starbucks and so that gas goes a little further until this thing is over and these gas prices come back down again,” she told radio host Todd Starnes last month. “Let’s just try to be patriots about this.” In San Diego, where Republicans are hoping to hold onto the redrawn House seat being vacated by Rep. Darrell Issa, San Diego County Supervisor Jim Desmond defended the war effort days after he launched his campaign last month, saying it was necessary to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons. “No pain, no gain,” Desmond said during an interview on Real America News. “It’s unfortunate that oil prices are going up, but I do believe this is a spike and President Trump is right – once we are able to get rid of their nuclear capabilities, oil prices will come down again.” One of the Democrats running in the open primary for Issa’s old seat, San Diego city councilmember Marni von Wilpert, has referenced the comments throughout her campaign, including at her own recent gas station press conference. Republicans have also compared the current spike in gas costs to the high prices under former President Joe Biden. Gas prices rose to a record high average price of $5 a gallon in 2022, according to AAA, fueled by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, US and European sanctions on Russia and the slow return of US oil production and refinery capabilities to pre-pandemic levels. Asked how much longer his constituents will need to tolerate gas prices over $4 a gallon, New York Rep. Mike Lawler told Bloomberg News his constituents “suffered greatly” under those prices under Biden and “many of my Democratic colleagues said everything was great.” “But the fact is, this is a short-term fluctuation in the oil markets that we will focus on like a laser to bring down and ensure that gas prices come back below $3 as expeditiously as possible,” Lawler said. In Democratic-led states like California and New York, where costs for gas and other goods were already high compared to the rest of the country, Republicans are urging their candidates to shift some of the attention to Democratic policies they argue have also contributed to high costs. “These Republicans in blue states need to run against their blue-state governance — and pretend they’ve never heard of Donald Trump,” said Rob Stutzman, a California-based Republican strategist. Brent Buchanan, a Republican pollster, advised his party’s candidates to be transparent with voters about the path forward. “People want to know what the plan is,” he said. “Voters are more forgiving when they know what’s ahead, even if that means we’re going to have high gas prices until the end of August.” The-CNN-Wire ™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Apr 18, 20268 votes

High gas prices become another midterm warning sign for Republicans

Apr 18, 202620 votes

A New Jersey special election could soon narrow the House GOP’s razor-thin majority

By Arit John, CNN (CNN) — Two months after progressive Analilia Mejia won a special election in the Democratic primary for New Jersey’s 11th District, voters will decide Thursday whether they want to send her to Congress. Mejia will face Republican Joe Hathaway, a member of the Randolph Township council. In a district where there are about 65,000 more registered Democrats than Republicans, according to the state’s Department of Elections, Mejia is favored to win the special election for the seat Mikie Sherrill vacated after being elected governor in November. Mejia has united most of the Democratic Party behind her, including former Rep. Tom Malinowski, who ran in the special primary and lost after facing a barrage of spending from a group linked to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. A Mejia victory on Thursday would be a boon for progressives, notably Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who endorsed her after she was national political director for his 2020 presidential campaign. Hathaway, meanwhile, is hoping to win over Democrats who feel Mejia would be too far left for the district. “I think on Thursday voters know they have a decision – an easy decision – to make,” Mejia told CNN. “Their pocketbook, the prices at the gas pump, the prices at the grocery store, are informing people about just how dangerous it is to send someone else to do Donald Trump’s bidding in Congress.” Hathaway has run as a moderate, a self-described “commonsense, independent” former mayor willing to buck the Republican Party. “For a lot of those Democrats out there, I say it kind of tongue in cheek, but I mean it too: They have an opportunity here,” he said. “If they’re really concerned about Analilia, there’s an opportunity to test drive a Republican for six months.” The winner of Thursday’s election will have an immediate impact on the razor-thin US House majority. House Speaker Mike Johnson is now able to lose two GOP defections on party-line votes and still pass legislation. A Mejia victory would shrink that margin yet again. Hathaway and Mejia are both also running in their party’s June primaries for a full two-year term that would start in January. AIPAC’s attacks on Malinowski boosted a more strident Israel critic A Mejia win would be a reminder of how AIPAC’s efforts to punish a former ally backfired. Prior to February’s primary, Malinowski had raised the most money and was well known thanks to his two terms in Congress representing a nearby district. He campaigned as the candidate most ready to jump into the role. Then the United Democracy Project, a super PAC aligned with AIPAC, spent $2 million on ads attacking Malinowski and portraying him as supportive of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, pointing to his 2019 vote for a bipartisan spending bill that funded the agency. “If AIPAC had never gotten involved, Tom Malinowski would be going to Congress right now,” said Julie Roginsky, a Democratic strategist who ran a super PAC supporting the former congressman. The campaign came as a surprise given that Malinowski – a self-described Zionist – had a strong pro-Israel voting record. AIPAC, however, took issue with the former congressman’s willingness to place conditions on aid to Israel. “I wouldn’t promise a blank check in advance for anything a prime minister would ask for,” Malinowski told The New York Times in January. After his loss, Malinowski blasted AIPAC in an op-ed published by The Bulwark, arguing that the group’s attacks on him were meant to intimidate other Democrats. He warned that if AIPAC’s vision of being pro-Israel “requires smearing even the most moderate elected officials who ask questions” then “the number of Americans (and the number of members of Congress) who pass its test will be too small to sustain any kind of relationship with the Jewish state.” The attacks on Malinowski likely aided Mejia, who was the only candidate during a forum to raise her hand when asked if they agreed with human rights groups that have accused Israel of committing genocide in Gaza in response to Hamas’ October 7, 2023, attack. (Israel has denied genocide allegations.) After the February race, a spokesperson for the United Democracy Project said the group would be monitoring the June primary for a full term, but a strong challenger to Mejia has not emerged. Former Lt. Gov. Tahesha Way, who finished third after being endorsed by Democratic Majority for Israel, another pro-Israel group, said in March she would not run again. And Malinowski endorsed and campaigned with Mejia ahead of Thursday’s election. ‘You meet people where they’re at’ Mejia says she advanced by running a grassroots campaign and focusing on voters’ economic concerns. “I was able to connect with voters through that primary,” she said. “The closer we got to the election, I was trending. Why? Because, as an organizer, I know you meet people where they’re at.” Though she’s never held political office, she spent several years working behind the scenes. She worked to help Democrats – including Malinowski and Sherrill – win Republican-held House seats in 2018 and pushed for a $15 minimum wage in the state as leader of the New Jersey Working Families Alliance. Mejia has sought to broaden her appeal in the final weeks of the campaign. “She’s done a very good job consolidating support since she won,” Roginsky said. “And if she continues to do that, when she’s in Congress, continues to listen to people in her district, which I’m sure she is, she’ll be fine.” Asked if she sees herself as part of “The Squad,” the progressive group in the House that includes Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida Tlaib, Mejia said the squad she’s most focused on is the voters in her district. “If you were going to define me as anything, it’s a scrappy New Jersey soccer mom that is willing to stand up for you,” she said. The-CNN-Wire ™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Apr 16, 20264 votes

A New Jersey special election could soon narrow the House GOP’s razor-thin majority

Apr 16, 202611 votes

A New Jersey special election could soon narrow the House GOP’s razor-thin majority

Apr 16, 202615 votes

Inside the sudden downfall of Eric Swalwell

By Sarah Ferris, CNN (CNN) — As one California Democrat prepared to formally endorse Rep. Eric Swalwell for governor this spring, the lawmaker hesitated. They had heard rumors the married father of three slept around in Washington and worried about putting their name behind him in a crucial contest. This member, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to speak freely, was clear they had not heard about the now-public allegations of criminal sexual assault or relationships with subordinates in Congress, which is a violation of House ethics rules. But when this member had asked about the rumored infidelity — which Democrats on Capitol Hill widely described to CNN as an “open secret” — they were assured by some of Swalwell’s close friends that all the rumors were “just activities before he was married” and encouraged to formally back him in the race. This person was not alone: Other members also directly questioned Swalwell and his team about what would happen if his history of womanizing in Washington came out publicly, only to be brushed off by his team, another person confirmed. Weeks later, that California member, along with nearly two dozen others, abruptly withdrew their endorsements as Swalwell faced a torrent of sexual assault and misconduct allegations published by CNN and others. Swalwell’s downfall was swift. In a remarkable 100 hours, he went from a front-runner in a race to lead the nation’s most populous state to abandoning his House seat in disgrace. His resignation, effective Tuesday, capped a 13-year congressional career, in which he held coveted party positions and was seen by some as part of a new generation of Democratic leadership. CNN has reached out to Swalwell’s attorney for this story, but did not receive a response. The congressman has repeatedly vowed to fight what he called “the serious, false allegation made against” him. His exit from both the governor’s race and Congress was the result of an intense, unusually quick pressure campaign from his fellow Democratic lawmakers — notably led by his one-time mentor, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi. This bloc of powerful Democrats, the loudest of whom were women, decided to not only immediately sever ties with Swalwell, but to push him out of Congress for good. And in an extraordinary — and politically advantageous — move, they worked to ensure that Swalwell would not be the only one punished for serious allegations of sexual misconduct inside the US Capitol. Once the party had officially abandoned Swalwell, they set out to make a bipartisan pact with GOP colleagues to ensure the same consequence would befall GOP Rep. Tony Gonzales of Texas, who has admitted to having a sexual relationship with a former staffer who later committed suicide. The whisper network hits Washington The end of Swalwell’s career came into view a few weeks earlier, as vague mentions of his alleged sexual misconduct surfaced online from well-known TikTokers before any survivors officially came forward. Those online influencers, who were well-known in some corners of the Democratic Party, hinted at women who were claiming to have suffered from Swalwell’s alleged misconduct, including some who had worked for him. One woman, Cheyenne Hunt, is a lawyer and former Hill staffer who once ran her own campaign for a House seat. Hunt said she helped pursue accountability for Swalwell “because the first victim who approached me is a close friend,” as she posted on X on April 6, days before CNN’s first published account. But, she said, when she learned of others whose experiences “fit the same pattern of manipulation and abuse of power, I knew I couldn’t stay silent.” These posts by Hunt and others began popping up in the California delegation’s members-only group chat, according to one person familiar with the conversations. None of his colleagues, though, had yet spoken out publicly. As recently as Tuesday, Swalwell was pressing forward with his bid for the governors’ mansion, holding a “community town hall” during Congress’ spring break from Washington. Hours after his campaign sought to publicly push back against the swirling social media claims that a number of women would soon come forward with accusations of sexual misconduct, Swalwell took questions from the audience in Sacramento. But it was a civil stop on the campaign trail: No one asked about the allegations, and Swalwell stuck to his usual themes. But he was soon forced to respond. Speaking to reporters afterward, he fiercely denied the allegations of having relationships with staffers and forcing his team to sign non-disclosure agreements — while suggesting the accusations were only surfacing because of the proximity to the primary. “Look, we’re 27 days before an election starts,” Swalwell told reporters. The full extent of those allegations materialized last Friday, as several women went public describing sexual abuse by the now-former congressman. In the following days, women with additional disturbing claims came forward, with one woman publicly alleging Swalwell drugged and then raped her in a hotel room around a political event. A lawyer for Swalwell said he “categorically and unequivocally denies each and every allegation of sexual misconduct and assault that has been leveled against him.” Inside the US Capitol, the accusations unleashed a sense of fury and disgust among some senior Democrats, including his long-time mentor, Pelosi, who felt blindsided by the accusations, according to multiple people familiar with the internal discussions. Not all Democrats, however, were as shell-shocked. In interviews, dozens of lawmakers and senior aides said Swalwell’s womanizing reputation was widely known, though those relationships were believed to be consensual. Several reacted to Swalwell’s decision to enter the governor’s race with an eyeroll, rather than any real concern — just as they did his short-lived presidential bid in 2020. But when they learned of the new predatory — and in some cases potentially criminal — allegations, top House Democrats decided almost immediately to sever ties. Hours after the first report surfaced by the San Francisco Chronicle, and CNN soon after, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries privately conferred with his top two deputies, Reps. Katherine Clark and Pete Aguilar. None of them had any direct conversations with Swalwell after the reports dropped — adhering to the party’s strict no tolerance policy since the Hill’s #MeToo push a decade earlier, according to multiple people familiar with the conversations. Instead, they quickly agreed to put all three of their names on a blistering statement calling on him to drop out of the California governor’s race. Then, as those damning news reports rippled through members’ inboxes on Friday, it was Pelosi who helped put a definitive end to Swalwell’s career in Washington and Sacramento. ‘One of Pelosi’s boys’ Swalwell had been fiercely loyal to the veteran Democrat and was known as “one of Pelosi’s boys” by members and aides during her speakership. In Pelosi’s four decades in politics, one of her many repeated mantras is that “nothing ever resolves itself.” In this instance as House Democrats faced a growing political storm and a humiliating expulsion vote against one of their own members, Pelosi decided to resolve the Swalwell crisis herself. The 86-year-old said she had phoned Swalwell and urged him to leave politics — a rare and stunning public statement from the immensely private former House speaker. In the hours before, she had received phone calls and texts from many of her fellow California Democrats, who wanted to know whether she planned to take action, according to one person close to Pelosi. They knew that Pelosi had been Swalwell’s most important ally in the Capitol and at home. (Multiple Democrats said they were confident that Pelosi was being truthful when she said she had never heard the unsavory accusations against Swalwell.) In her time leading the party, Pelosi appointed him to powerful panels, including the House Intelligence Committee. In one of her last acts as speaker, she made him one of the faces of President Donald Trump’s second impeachment after the January 6, 2021, US Capitol attack. “He owed pretty much everything he’s done here to Pelosi,” one senior Democratic aide said of Swalwell. “She kind of adopted Swalwell” into her northern California family, another senior Democratic aide added. “She saw him as a rising star.” She also defended him at a key moment in his career: Shortly after he arrived in Congress, US officials investigated Swalwell for his connection to a Chinese spy who was running a secretive operation to gain access to US politicians to gather intel on Washington. Pelosi and Democratic leadership privately, but immediately, confronted Swalwell about his connection with the suspected Chinese spy and told him to cut all ties. He vowed that he did, was never charged with a crime and later was cleared by a separate House Ethics Committee investigation into the matter. More recently, Democratic leaders appeared to stand by Swalwell as he was newly in the crosshairs of the Trump administration and allies who were seeking to damage his gubernatorial campaign by reviving the spy claims. The FBI, at the request of the White House, dedicated resources in recent weeks to redact files from the investigation and turned them over to the White House, according to people familiar with the matter. But on the misconduct allegations, there was no discussion, no back-and-forth with the two colleagues from the same northern California alliance in the state’s famous “five family” factions. Pelosi was asked Monday evening at a George Washington University event if she had recommended Swalwell step down, but she did not directly answer. Instead, she said resigning was “his decision” and “the right thing to do.” Once it became clear that top Democrats, including Jeffries and Pelosi, were abandoning the congressman, several rank-and-file members began mobilizing a push to oust him from their ranks. It wasn’t just about Swalwell. From their homes across the country, several female members phoned their House GOP colleagues to make sure that whatever punishment happened to Swalwell was going to be the same for Gonzales, the Texas Republican facing his own torrent of accusations. These women from both parties — led by Reps. Teresa Leger Fernandez, a Democrat from New Mexico, and Anna Paulina Luna, a Florida Republican — effectively reached an accountability pact in the narrowly divided House. If the Democrat is punished, then the Republican, will too be punished. Privately, even some party leaders were involved. Clark spoke with GOP leaders to push for an “expel for expel” resolution to both members’ misconduct, according to a person involved in the discussions. Then, as more accusations came out, it became a “resign for resign.” A spokesperson for Speaker Mike Johnson’s office denied there was anything coordinated between the two parties at the leadership-level on this issue. The-CNN-Wire ™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved. CNN’s Eric Bradner, Dana Bash, Evan Perez and Hannah Rabinowitz contributed to this report.

Apr 15, 202622 votes

Inside the sudden downfall of Eric Swalwell

Apr 15, 202616 votes

Talarico raises $27 million in first quarter as Senate Democrats announce strong fundraising numbers

By David Wright, CNN (CNN) — Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico announced a massive first-quarter fundraising haul of more than $27 million on Wednesday, among the largest totals reported by a US Senate candidate. Talarico, a state representative and Presbyterian seminarian, won the Democratic nomination in March over US Rep. Jasmine Crockett. His campaign said he has raised $10 million since the March 3 primary. Democrats are hoping Talarico will be able to put reliably red Texas in play at the statewide level as they face a tough national map for Senate control that would require them to net four seats. The Democratic state representative will face the winner of a May 26 runoff in the Republican primary between incumbent Sen. John Cornyn and state Attorney General Ken Paxton. Talarico’s campaign has drawn comparisons to former Rep. Beto O’Rourke’s 2018 bid against Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, in which O’Rourke raised then record-sums and galvanized state Democrats, ultimately losing to Cruz by less than three points. In the first quarter of that election year, O’Rourke had raised $6.8 million, and he went on to raise a total of $80 million for the race. No Democrat has won statewide in Texas in three decades. But Cornyn’s allies argue nominating Paxton would require Republicans to invest tens of millions of dollars in a general election. Talarico is among several Democratic Senate candidates announcing strong first-quarter fundraising totals this week around the Wednesday deadline to file reports with the Federal Election Commission. Georgia Sen. Jon Ossoff, who has a competitive reelection contest as the only incumbent Democrat running in a state won by President Donald Trump in 2024, said that he raised $14 million in the first quarter and would report over $31 million in cash on hand. Meanwhile, former North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper, running in another battleground contest pivotal to Democratic hopes of flipping the Senate, said that he raised $13.8 million. The-CNN-Wire ™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Apr 15, 202617 votes

Search

Scores for Local News 8

Credibility

Political lean

Originality

Articles this site reproduces

Original publishers of articles on localnews8.com

Stories ChamberLight collected, by month

Top topics

Who they cover

Most covered

Article tone

Challenges to these scores

Articles served from localnews8.com

Longtime Georgia Democrat US Rep. David Scott dies at 80

Virginia voters to decide on new House map with major midterm implications

Virginia voters to decide on new House map with major midterm implications

On Capitol Hill, RFK Jr. defends vaccine policies, ongoing shakeups

Feud between Mace and Mills flares as the Republicans trade barbs, expulsion threats

Feud between Mace and Mills flares as the Republicans trade barbs, expulsion threats

Feud between Mace and Mills flares as the Republicans trade barbs, expulsion threats

Virginia voters to decide on new House map with major midterm implications

Virginia voters to decide on new House map with major midterm implications

How a must-win Michigan Senate race turned messy for Democrats

How a must-win Michigan Senate race turned messy for Democrats

How a must-win Michigan Senate race turned messy for Democrats

High gas prices become another midterm warning sign for Republicans

High gas prices become another midterm warning sign for Republicans

A New Jersey special election could soon narrow the House GOP’s razor-thin majority

A New Jersey special election could soon narrow the House GOP’s razor-thin majority

A New Jersey special election could soon narrow the House GOP’s razor-thin majority

Inside the sudden downfall of Eric Swalwell

Inside the sudden downfall of Eric Swalwell

Talarico raises $27 million in first quarter as Senate Democrats announce strong fundraising numbers