1 story credited to KYMA
2 stories on kyma.com credited to other publishers
Latest story Apr 19, 2026 · on ChamberLight since Apr 2026
A story can appear as several articles (copies of the same piece), so counts of stories and of articles differ.
Scores for KYMA
Writing quality not enough rated stories yet: 1 of 10. How it is measured
Scores last checked Sep 24, 2026.
Articles this site reproduces
How provenance is decidedOriginal publishers of articles on kyma.com
Counted from articles on kyma.com whose original publisher is verified from the page itself or confirmed by an independent signal.
Stories ChamberLight collected, by month
Stories credited to KYMA, by publication date. ChamberLight collects articles that mention the officials it tracks, so this shows its own coverage of this source, not how much the source publishes.
- Stories from KYMA
- Shaded: ChamberLight collected no stories, or almost none, from any outlet (a gap in its collection, not in the outlet’s publishing)
Show as a table
| Month | Stories | All outlets |
|---|---|---|
| April 2026 | 1 | 2,920 |
| May 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| June 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| July 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| August 2026 | 0 | 1 (collection gap) |
| September 2026 | 0 | 598 |
Top topics
Share of this source’s stories tagged with each topic. A story can carry several topics, so the shares do not add up to 100%.
- Budget/Spending1
100% of 1 stories · 33% across all outlets
- Defense/Military1
100% of 1 stories · 26% across all outlets
- Foreign Policy1
100% of 1 stories · 30% across all outlets
The thin mark on each bar is the topic’s share across all outlets.
Who they cover
Party of the officials these stories are mainly about, across all 1 officials named. A story counts once for each official it is mainly about, so the split is over 1 story–official pair, from 1 story.
- Democrat100% · 1 pair
Most covered
Stories mainly about each official, and their share of the source’s 1 story.
Article tone
ChamberLight’s article analysis assigns each story a tone toward the official it covers. It describes the coverage of that official, not KYMA’s stance, and reader votes do not change it. 1 story.
- Good Look
- 0 (0%)
- Mixed
- 1 (100%)
- Informational
- 0 (0%)
- Bad Look
- 0 (0%)
Challenges to these scores
No one has challenged a score on this page yet. Anyone can; editors publish every outcome here.
Articles served from kyma.com
5
Former U.S. Surgeon General on President Trump’s pick for leading the CDC and Tylenol
(CBS, KYMA) - Dr. Jerome Adams, former U.S. Surgeon General, spoke with Margaret Brennan on Face the Nation Sunday about President Donald Trump's pick to lead the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). According to Brennan, the U.S. has been without a Senate-confirmed CDC director after HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired Dr. Susan Monarez a month into her term. However, this past week, President Donald Trump named Dr. Erica Schwartz, who was Dr. Adams' Deputy Surgeon General, to lead the CDC, prompting Brennan to ask Adams if he sees this as a deliberate choice by the White House to pick someone who actually supports vaccines, to which he said: "Absolutely. And again, we've talked in the past about the fact that the Fabrizio and Ward poll showed that Republicans were going to pay in the midterm elections if they continued on an anti-vaccine push. But I want to say Dr. Schwartz is a home run pick. She has an MD, a JD and an MPH and more than two decades of public service in the Coast Guard, where she was chief medical officer and in the Public Health Service, as you mentioned, which she retired from as a Rear Admiral, and it's why I personally selected her to be my deputy surgeon general." Brennan followed by asking Adams if he has any concerns that Dr. Schwartz will be able to conduct herself without political interference, and Adams said: "It's a great, and it's a fair question...I'd say she is objectively the most qualified health nominee we've seen from this administration so far, and I want to give the President and senior HHS adviser Chris Klomp credit for tapping her, but that said, my optimism as yours comes with a healthy dose of caution about the environment around Dr. Schwartz. We've seen this before, as you mentioned with Susan Monarez, and just last week, the acting CDC director held back an MMWR report showing COVID vaccines reduced ER visits in healthy adults this winter. Further, Dr. Schwartz still has to get through Senate confirmation, where she will clearly be pitted against RFK on vaccines. And recent history tells us, if she's confirmed, she will be under real threat to follow ideology over evidence in what is a vaccine skeptical HHS, while also confronting a growing measles outbreak, low CDC morale and ongoing DOGE cut impacts." During the interview, Brennan and Adams talked about Secretary Kennedy's being asked about past statements both he and the president made about linking Tylenol use in pregnant women to autism in their children, with Rep. Blake Moore (R-Utah), whose son is neurodivergent, saying Kennedy's remarks were hurtful. "I was underwhelmed with what we ultimately put out. My wife was hurt, and she felt for a split second until she came to her senses and we talked about this, that there was any way she was responsible. We don't even know if she took Tylenol during her pregnancy, but that was a hurtful moment for her," Rep. Moore expressed. However, Kennedy said the studies showing there is no linkage between Tylenol and autism are "garbage," leading Brennan to ask Adams what the reality is, and he said: "The reality is that for pregnant women dealing with fever or significant pain, Tylenol remains one of the safest and most studied options we have. And suggesting otherwise without evidence, is dangerous. It's irresponsible, and as you heard the Congressman say, it is extremely stigmatizing towards parents and risks real harm to moms and babies. The science moves forward with data, not with dogma and with dismissal and the garbage he was referring to was a Danish study of 1.5 million children that came out, and it presents queer- clear, high quality evidence that pregnant women who use Tylenol do not have an increased risk of autism. In fact, in that study, they had a lower risk of autism." To watch more of Brennan's interview with Adams, click here. The post Former U.S. Surgeon General on President Trump’s pick for leading the CDC and Tylenol appeared first on KYMA.
Former U.S. Surgeon General on President Trump’s pick for leading the CDC and Tylenol
(CBS, KYMA) - Dr. Jerome Adams, former U.S. Surgeon General, spoke with Margaret Brennan on Face the Nation Sunday about President Donald Trump's pick to lead the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). According to Brennan, the U.S. has been without a Senate-confirmed CDC director after HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired Dr. Susan Monarez a month into her term. However, this past week, President Donald Trump named Dr. Erica Schwartz, who was Dr. Adams' Deputy Surgeon General, to lead the CDC, prompting Brennan to ask Adams if he sees this as a deliberate choice by the White House to pick someone who actually supports vaccines, to which he said: "Absolutely. And again, we've talked in the past about the fact that the Fabrizio and Ward poll showed that Republicans were going to pay in the midterm elections if they continued on an anti-vaccine push. But I want to say Dr. Schwartz is a home run pick. She has an MD, a JD and an MPH and more than two decades of public service in the Coast Guard, where she was chief medical officer and in the Public Health Service, as you mentioned, which she retired from as a Rear Admiral, and it's why I personally selected her to be my deputy surgeon general." Brennan followed by asking Adams if he has any concerns that Dr. Schwartz will be able to conduct herself without political interference, and Adams said: "It's a great, and it's a fair question...I'd say she is objectively the most qualified health nominee we've seen from this administration so far, and I want to give the President and senior HHS adviser Chris Klomp credit for tapping her, but that said, my optimism as yours comes with a healthy dose of caution about the environment around Dr. Schwartz. We've seen this before, as you mentioned with Susan Monarez, and just last week, the acting CDC director held back an MMWR report showing COVID vaccines reduced ER visits in healthy adults this winter. Further, Dr. Schwartz still has to get through Senate confirmation, where she will clearly be pitted against RFK on vaccines. And recent history tells us, if she's confirmed, she will be under real threat to follow ideology over evidence in what is a vaccine skeptical HHS, while also confronting a growing measles outbreak, low CDC morale and ongoing DOGE cut impacts." During the interview, Brennan and Adams talked about Secretary Kennedy's being asked about past statements both he and the president made about linking Tylenol use in pregnant women to autism in their children, with Rep. Blake Moore (R-Utah), whose son is neurodivergent, saying Kennedy's remarks were hurtful. "I was underwhelmed with what we ultimately put out. My wife was hurt, and she felt for a split second until she came to her senses and we talked about this, that there was any way she was responsible. We don't even know if she took Tylenol during her pregnancy, but that was a hurtful moment for her," Rep. Moore expressed. However, Kennedy said the studies showing there is no linkage between Tylenol and autism are "garbage," leading Brennan to ask Adams what the reality is, and he said: "The reality is that for pregnant women dealing with fever or significant pain, Tylenol remains one of the safest and most studied options we have. And suggesting otherwise without evidence, is dangerous. It's irresponsible, and as you heard the Congressman say, it is extremely stigmatizing towards parents and risks real harm to moms and babies. The science moves forward with data, not with dogma and with dismissal and the garbage he was referring to was a Danish study of 1.5 million children that came out, and it presents queer- clear, high quality evidence that pregnant women who use Tylenol do not have an increased risk of autism. In fact, in that study, they had a lower risk of autism." To watch more of Brennan's interview with Adams, click here. The post Former U.S. Surgeon General on President Trump’s pick for leading the CDC and Tylenol appeared first on KYMA.
Democratic senators on effort to end war in Iran
WASHINGTON (KYMA, NBC) - Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), along with his Democratic colleagues in the U.S. Senate, held a press conference Monday. According to a press release, the press conference was to announce a batch of newly filed War Powers Resolutions in order to force a vote to stop the war in Iran. "Americans want Washington to improve their lives, not to drag us into another endless conflict in the Middle East that is putting American service members at risk and driving up costs at home. Congress has the power to stop this chaos and hold this president in check, and that’s exactly what we should do. Then Washington can focus on what the American people need, starting with lowering costs," said Sen. Kelly Along Kelly, the following Democratic senators also participated in the press conference: Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.) Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Ma.) Sen. Andy Kim (D-N.J.) Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.) To watch the livestream of the press conference, see attached video. The post Democratic senators on effort to end war in Iran appeared first on KYMA.
Virginia senator on ongoing war with Iran
(CBS, KYMA) - Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) spoke with Margaret Brennan on Face the Nation Sunday about the ongoing war with Iran. Brennan brought up her previous interview with Michael Leiter, Israeli Ambassador to the U.S., who said he was in the room the day when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pitched President Donald Trump on the war, and said the press accounts were wrong. When asked if this was true, Sen. Warner said: "I was not in that meeting. I know two things. One, having seen all the intelligence, there was no imminent threat from Iran against the United States. And two, I take my former colleague, and now Secretary of State Marco Rubio, at his word when he publicly said, 'Well, we knew the Israelis were going to strike Iran, so we felt we needed to go ahead and strike first, since Iran would attack us.' So we are where we are, but let's- no American should forget this is a war of choice, chosen by the president, and if we just quickly look at the goals regime change, frankly, the new leadership is more radical getting the enriched uranium out would require 10,000 troops minimum, guarding a perimeter around a bunker where our troops would have to go in and get this very volatile uranium out...the Iranians could bomb that. We've taken down a lot of their ballistic missiles whether to be seen. They still have many left shooting down our planes. Thank God our military is world class and got those pilots out, but they literally have thousands of drones left. And this question about what the president is going to do with closing the Strait of Hormuz. The Iranians have hundreds of speed boats where they can still mine the strait or put bombs against tankers in closing the strait. How is that going to ever bring down gas prices?" Regarding the 10,000 troop requirement, Brennan asked the senator if it was an official government estimate, or if it was with Iranian government's permission to have boots on the ground, and Warner said: "This has been known for. There is a reason, the Iranian regime is awful. I agree with the ambassador on that they've been awful for 47 years. But there was a reason why previous presidents, including President Trump in his first term, didn't choose to go to war, because this is extraordinarily complicated, the fact that the president acts like he's surprised the Iranians closed the strait or would attack our Gulf allies. Anybody would have read the intelligence would've known that was first. The ability to protect our soldiers would require every estimate, I've seen at least 10,000 troops guarding a perimeter, sending troops into these bunkers for days on end. Very vulnerable. The Iranians still have ability to bomb their own bunkers. That is again a reason why I think action like this has not been taken before." During the interview, Brennan also brought up a report from both CNN and the New York Times saying China is set to deliver new air defense systems to Iran within the next few weeks, with Ambassador Leiter acknowledging that China was considering helping Iran. This prompted Brennan to ask Warner how he would describe Beijing's support at this point, to which the senator said: "I would describe it as significant, but they try to hide themselves. China says, well, this is their private sector. We all know there is no such thing as a true private sector in China. Every company in China has to have its first loyalty to the Communist Party. But what we have done, let me also point out Margaret, by the Trump administration releasing sanctions on Russian oil. That's $10 billion to Putin. More crazy is by releasing sanctions on Iranian oil at sea, we have literally funded the Iranian government $14 billion that they're using to buy from China and elsewhere weapons to attack our troops. That is insanity in my mind." To watch more of Brennan's interview with Warner, click here. The post Virginia senator on ongoing war with Iran appeared first on KYMA.
Virginia senator on ongoing war with Iran
(CBS, KYMA) - Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) spoke with Margaret Brennan on Face the Nation Sunday about the ongoing war with Iran. Brennan brought up her previous interview with Michael Leiter, Israeli Ambassador to the U.S., who said he was in the room the day when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pitched President Donald Trump on the war, and said the press accounts were wrong. When asked if this was true, Sen. Warner said: "I was not in that meeting. I know two things. One, having seen all the intelligence, there was no imminent threat from Iran against the United States. And two, I take my former colleague, and now Secretary of State Marco Rubio, at his word when he publicly said, 'Well, we knew the Israelis were going to strike Iran, so we felt we needed to go ahead and strike first, since Iran would attack us.' So we are where we are, but let's- no American should forget this is a war of choice, chosen by the president, and if we just quickly look at the goals regime change, frankly, the new leadership is more radical getting the enriched uranium out would require 10,000 troops minimum, guarding a perimeter around a bunker where our troops would have to go in and get this very volatile uranium out...the Iranians could bomb that. We've taken down a lot of their ballistic missiles whether to be seen. They still have many left shooting down our planes. Thank God our military is world class and got those pilots out, but they literally have thousands of drones left. And this question about what the president is going to do with closing the Strait of Hormuz. The Iranians have hundreds of speed boats where they can still mine the strait or put bombs against tankers in closing the strait. How is that going to ever bring down gas prices?" Regarding the 10,000 troop requirement, Brennan asked the senator if it was an official government estimate, or if it was with Iranian government's permission to have boots on the ground, and Warner said: "This has been known for. There is a reason, the Iranian regime is awful. I agree with the ambassador on that they've been awful for 47 years. But there was a reason why previous presidents, including President Trump in his first term, didn't choose to go to war, because this is extraordinarily complicated, the fact that the president acts like he's surprised the Iranians closed the strait or would attack our Gulf allies. Anybody would have read the intelligence would've known that was first. The ability to protect our soldiers would require every estimate, I've seen at least 10,000 troops guarding a perimeter, sending troops into these bunkers for days on end. Very vulnerable. The Iranians still have ability to bomb their own bunkers. That is again a reason why I think action like this has not been taken before." During the interview, Brennan also brought up a report from both CNN and the New York Times saying China is set to deliver new air defense systems to Iran within the next few weeks, with Ambassador Leiter acknowledging that China was considering helping Iran. This prompted Brennan to ask Warner how he would describe Beijing's support at this point, to which the senator said: "I would describe it as significant, but they try to hide themselves. China says, well, this is their private sector. We all know there is no such thing as a true private sector in China. Every company in China has to have its first loyalty to the Communist Party. But what we have done, let me also point out Margaret, by the Trump administration releasing sanctions on Russian oil. That's $10 billion to Putin. More crazy is by releasing sanctions on Iranian oil at sea, we have literally funded the Iranian government $14 billion that they're using to buy from China and elsewhere weapons to attack our troops. That is insanity in my mind." To watch more of Brennan's interview with Warner, click here. The post Virginia senator on ongoing war with Iran appeared first on KYMA.