Skip to main content

Search

Search people, articles, bills, and more

Instapundit logo

Instapundit

instapundit.com

Local NewsProvenance not yet reviewed

2 stories credited to Instapundit

Latest story Apr 1, 2026 · on ChamberLight since Apr 2026

A story can appear as several articles (copies of the same piece), so counts of stories and of articles differ.

Compare with another source

Scores for Instapundit

Credibility

Not enough stories yet: 1 of 10.

How this is measured

Political lean

Not enough stories yet: 1 of 10.

How this is measured

Originality

Not enough stories yet: 2 of 10.

How this is measured

Writing quality not enough rated stories yet: 1 of 10. How it is measured

Scores last checked Sep 24, 2026.

Stories ChamberLight collected, by month

Stories credited to Instapundit, by publication date. ChamberLight collects articles that mention the officials it tracks, so this shows its own coverage of this source, not how much the source publishes.

  • Stories from Instapundit
  • Shaded: ChamberLight collected no stories, or almost none, from any outlet (a gap in its collection, not in the outlet’s publishing)
Show as a table
MonthStoriesAll outlets
October 202518 (collection gap)
November 2025079
December 2025027
January 2026087
February 20260180
March 202601,094
April 202614,537
May 20260none collected
June 20260none collected
July 20260none collected
August 202601 (collection gap)
September 20260598

Top topics

Share of this source’s stories tagged with each topic. A story can carry several topics, so the shares do not add up to 100%.

  • Ethics/Corruption2

    100% of 2 stories · 62% across all outlets

  • Criminal Justice1

    50% of 2 stories · 20% across all outlets

  • Immigration1

    50% of 2 stories · 13% across all outlets

  • Voting Rights1

    50% of 2 stories · 20% across all outlets

The thin mark on each bar is the topic’s share across all outlets.

Who they cover

Party of the officials these stories are mainly about, across all 3 officials named. A story counts once for each official it is mainly about, so the split is over 3 story–official pairs, from 2 stories.

  • Democrat33% · 1 pair
  • Republican33% · 1 pair
  • Party not recorded33% · 1 pair

Most covered

Stories mainly about each official, and their share of the source’s 2 stories.

  1. 1Constantine Jean-Pierre–1 story · 50%
  2. 2Donald TrumpR1 story · 50%
  3. 3Susie LeeD1 story · 50%

Article tone

ChamberLight’s article analysis assigns each story a tone toward the official it covers. It describes the coverage of that official, not Instapundit’s stance, and reader votes do not change it. 2 stories.

Good Look
0 (0%)
Mixed
1 (50%)
Informational
1 (50%)
Bad Look
0 (0%)

Challenges to these scores

No one has challenged a score on this page yet. Anyone can; editors publish every outcome here.

Articles served from instapundit.com

3

NEW CIVILITY WATCH: ‘F*ck Him To His Face:’ Democrat Lawmaker Deletes Unhinged Late-Night Post

NEW CIVILITY WATCH: ‘F*ck Him To His Face:’ Democrat Lawmaker Deletes Unhinged Late-Night Post About Trump. Rep. Susie Lee (D-NV) deleted a profane X post about President Donald Trump after it drew backlash online. Lee made the comment early Wednesday in response to reports that Trump planned to attend Supreme Court oral arguments in a high-stakes birthright citizenship case. “So f*cking f*cked up. I’ll pray they f*ck him to his face,” Lee wrote at around 1 a.m. Eastern Time Wednesday in the replies to an Associated Press story about the visit. “Sorry, I say f*ck a lot these days.” The post was later deleted, but she appeared to defend herself in a subsequent post on Wednesday morning. “Clearly my language touched a nerve — my nerve was touched by the attacks on our Constitution and its separation of powers. I took an oath to protect and defend it,” Lee wrote. The posts were both made from her personal account, where the banner touts a claim that she is “America’s #1 Most Bipartisan Member of Congress.” Past performance is no guarantee of future results: The only thing more powerful than hate is love 💛 https://t.co/fMd1csdGJB — Susie Lee (@SusieLeeNV) February 9, 2026 In a now deleted post, Rep. Susie Lee (D-NV) said of President Trump going to SCOTUS this morning: "So fucking fucked up. I'll pray they fuck him to his face." pic.twitter.com/tSW5jJnnlC — Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) April 1, 2026

Apr 1, 202618 votes

NEW CIVILITY WATCH: ‘F*ck Him To His Face:’ Democrat Lawmaker Deletes Unhinged Late-Night Post

NEW CIVILITY WATCH: ‘F*ck Him To His Face:’ Democrat Lawmaker Deletes Unhinged Late-Night Post About Trump. Rep. Susie Lee (D-NV) deleted a profane X post about President Donald Trump after it drew backlash online. Lee made the comment early Wednesday in response to reports that Trump planned to attend Supreme Court oral arguments in a high-stakes birthright citizenship case. “So f*cking f*cked up. I’ll pray they f*ck him to his face,” Lee wrote at around 1 a.m. Eastern Time Wednesday in the replies to an Associated Press story about the visit. “Sorry, I say f*ck a lot these days.” The post was later deleted, but she appeared to defend herself in a subsequent post on Wednesday morning. “Clearly my language touched a nerve — my nerve was touched by the attacks on our Constitution and its separation of powers. I took an oath to protect and defend it,” Lee wrote. The posts were both made from her personal account, where the banner touts a claim that she is “America’s #1 Most Bipartisan Member of Congress.” Past performance is no guarantee of future results: The only thing more powerful than hate is love 💛 https://t.co/fMd1csdGJB — Susie Lee (@SusieLeeNV) February 9, 2026 In a now deleted post, Rep. Susie Lee (D-NV) said of President Trump going to SCOTUS this morning: "So fucking fucked up. I'll pray they fuck him to his face." pic.twitter.com/tSW5jJnnlC — Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) April 1, 2026

Apr 1, 202617 votes

JIM GERAGHTY: The Left’s Disingenuous Pile-On of Karine Jean-Pierre. We know darn well what’s g

JIM GERAGHTY: The Left’s Disingenuous Pile-On of Karine Jean-Pierre. We know darn well what’s going on here. First, as Megyn Kelly emphasized yesterday, Karine Jean-Pierre is no longer useful to the Democratic Party, so no one is interested in protecting her. But secondly, Jean-Pierre is embarrassing Democrats by continuing to say things that were supposed to be memory-holed. On her book tour, she’s reiterating what a whole lot of Democrats believed, said, and defended right up until the night of Joe Biden’s debate. In the past few weeks, Jean-Pierre has insisted that even as an octogenarian, Joe Biden could have served another four years and ably performed his duties. (Again, the man who turns 83 years old next month is getting radiation therapy for prostate cancer.) She’s insisted the Biden administration had no scandals, and that Biden had done a great job. Now, a whole lot of people in the Democratic Party and mainstream media were insisting the same things, right up until shortly after 9 p.m. Eastern on June 27, 2024. Sure, Jean-Pierre is completely wrong when she insists that the Democratic Party’s leadership acted wrongly, unethically, or immorally when they pushed Biden out as their nominee in the summer of 2024. But you can’t begrudge her feeling some whiplash in a world where Delaware Senator Chris Coons was attacking other Democrats for expressing the same doubts about Biden’s abilities that he had himself. To be a Democrat in 2024 meant believing, and publicly insisting, that Biden was fine for another four years, and then, just about immediately after the debate, completely reversing yourself and insisting that Biden had to be replaced with Kamala Harris. Jean-Pierre’s cardinal sin is that she still believes all the things she was supposed to believe on the afternoon of June 27 and publicly says so. She’s still insisting that the emperor is wearing clothing, and a whole lot of Democrats want everyone to forget that they, too, spent a lot of time insisting the emperor’s new clothes looked fabulous. As with Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson’s Original Sin, the media are tearing into KJP now in the hopes that the public will forget how they protected Biden and hid his mental and physical decline from 2019 until the June 2024 debate with Trump made their coverup impossible. Assuming Biden was in office today, or early in 2025, had handed to baton to Kamala Harris, the DNC-MSM would still be just as fawning to her as they were last year.

Oct 30, 20259 votes