2 stories credited to FinanceFeeds
Latest story Apr 10, 2026 · on ChamberLight since Apr 2026
A story can appear as several articles (copies of the same piece), so counts of stories and of articles differ.
Scores for FinanceFeeds
Writing quality not enough rated stories yet: 2 of 10. How it is measured
Scores last checked Sep 25, 2026.
Stories ChamberLight collected, by month
Stories credited to FinanceFeeds, by publication date. ChamberLight collects articles that mention the officials it tracks, so this shows its own coverage of this source, not how much the source publishes.
- Stories from FinanceFeeds
- Shaded: ChamberLight collected no stories, or almost none, from any outlet (a gap in its collection, not in the outlet’s publishing)
Show as a table
| Month | Stories | All outlets |
|---|---|---|
| March 2026 | 1 | 365 |
| April 2026 | 1 | 4,537 |
| May 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| June 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| July 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| August 2026 | 0 | 1 (collection gap) |
| September 2026 | 0 | 598 |
Top topics
Share of this source’s stories tagged with each topic. A story can carry several topics, so the shares do not add up to 100%.
- Economy2
100% of 2 stories · 24% across all outlets
- Ethics/Corruption2
100% of 2 stories · 56% across all outlets
- Technology/Privacy2
100% of 2 stories · 9% across all outlets
The thin mark on each bar is the topic’s share across all outlets.
Who they cover
Party of the officials these stories are mainly about, across all 4 officials named. A story counts once for each official it is mainly about, so the split is over 4 story–official pairs, from 2 stories.
- Democrat50% · 2 pairs
- Republican50% · 2 pairs
Most covered
Stories mainly about each official, and their share of the source’s 2 stories.
Article tone
ChamberLight’s article analysis assigns each story a tone toward the official it covers. It describes the coverage of that official, not FinanceFeeds’s stance, and reader votes do not change it. 2 stories.
- Good Look
- 2 (100%)
- Mixed
- 0 (0%)
- Informational
- 0 (0%)
- Bad Look
- 0 (0%)
Challenges to these scores
No one has challenged a score on this page yet. Anyone can; editors publish every outcome here.
Articles served from financefeeds.com
4
SEC Reg Crypto and CLARITY Act Reshape US Digital Asset…
The conventional wisdom — that Washington moves too slowly to keep pace with crypto innovation — just collided with reality. In the span of three weeks, the SEC sent its landmark "Regulation Crypto" proposal to the White House for final review, the SEC and CFTC formalised a historic jurisdiction-sharing agreement, and the Senate Banking Committee prepared to mark up the CLARITY Act in late April. For brokers, exchanges, and institutional platforms that have spent years operating in regulatory grey zones, the message is unmistakable: the rules are arriving, and they are arriving fast. What makes this moment genuinely different from previous regulatory false starts is its structural completeness. Unlike the piecemeal guidance of 2023–2024 or the enforcement-first posture of the Gensler era, the current framework attacks classification, fundraising, stablecoin governance, and agency jurisdiction simultaneously. Having covered three cycles of "this time it's different" rhetoric in crypto regulation, this is the first where the executive branch, both regulatory agencies, and Congress are moving in the same direction at once. The parallel to the JOBS Act's transformation of equity crowdfunding a decade ago is instructive — and possibly understated. Key Facts SEC's Reg Crypto proposal sent to White House OIRA on April 6, 2026 — one step from publication — CoinDesk, April 7, 2026 Two-tiered safe harbour: $5 million startup exemption (4 years) and $75 million fundraising exemption (12 months) — FinancialContent, April 9, 2026 Bitcoin, Ether, Solana, and XRP reclassified as "Digital Commodities" under CFTC oversight — SEC.gov, March 2026 "Crypto 10" index jumped 12% following the Reg Crypto announcement — FinancialContent, April 9, 2026 Stablecoin market capitalisation exceeded $150 billion with daily volumes regularly surpassing $50 billion — PYMNTS, April 2026 CLARITY Act cleared the House in July 2025; Senate markup targeted for late April 2026 — DL News, 2026 59% of institutions plan to allocate over 5% of AUM to crypto in 2026 — Grayscale, 2026 What Reg Crypto Actually Does — And Why It Matters 2026 midterm elections, signalling the administration's awareness that political winds could shift. Protocol and Industry Response: Who Is Doing What Regulation Crypto Assets framework draws heavily from the bipartisan CLARITY Act, which has given exchanges and platforms a head start on compliance preparation. The joint SEC-CFTC asset classification — which categorises digital assets into five groups: Digital Commodities, Digital Collectibles, Digital Tools, Payment Stablecoins, and Digital Securities — has already shifted operational planning across the industry. Bitcoin, Ether, Solana, and XRP are now classified as "Digital Commodities" under primary CFTC oversight, a move that effectively narrows the SEC's focus to tokens with genuine securities characteristics. For exchanges like Coinbase and Kraken, the reclassification resolves years of legal ambiguity. However, Coinbase's relationship with the regulatory framework remains complicated. The exchange generated approximately $1.35 billion in stablecoin-related revenue in 2025 through its USDC partnership with Circle, and CEO Brian Armstrong has previously stated that "limiting stablecoin rewards could entrench the competitive advantage of banks, particularly in a high interest rate environment where deposit yields remain a key differentiator." DeFi protocols face a more nuanced landscape. While the safe harbour exemptions primarily target centralised token issuance, the CLARITY Act's treatment of decentralised finance remains one of the outstanding issues that must be resolved before the Senate markup can proceed. Protocols like Aave, Uniswap, and MakerDAO are watching closely — their governance structures and token economics sit in the grey zone between the five classification categories. The "Crypto 10" index jumped 12% following the Reg Crypto announcement, and major crypto public companies reached multi-year highs. Markets are pricing in regulatory clarity as a direct catalyst for institutional capital deployment, with Grayscale reporting that 59% of institutional investors plan to allocate over 5% of assets under management to crypto in 2026. The CLARITY Act: Stablecoin Yield and the Final Mile CLARITY Act tackles the harder question of how the entire digital asset market is structured. The bill cleared the House of Representatives in July 2025 but has been stuck in the Senate Banking Committee since January, primarily over a single, fiercely contested provision: stablecoin yield. The compromise, negotiated by Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD), prohibits exchanges and platforms from offering yield or interest directly on stablecoin balances. However, it permits activity-based rewards tied to specific user actions — transactions, payments, remittances, staking, liquidity provision, collateral posting, and governance participation. Loyalty programmes, subscription benefits, and usage rebates also remain permissible. Senator Cynthia Lummis's press team has described the yield negotiations as "99% of the way to resolution," though Senator Bernie Moreno has warned that without advancement by May, digital asset legislation faces a years-long delay as the midterm election cycle dominates the Senate calendar. The Senate returns to full session on April 13, with the Banking Committee markup targeted for the final two weeks of the month. But a late complication has emerged: Senate Banking Republicans are discussing attaching community bank deregulatory provisions to the CLARITY Act as part of a broader legislative trade involving housing policy. Patrick Witt, the White House Crypto Council Executive Director, reportedly appeared "frustrated" after a recent GOP Senate meeting where the proposal was raised. A White House report has pushed back against banking industry concerns, claiming that banning stablecoin rewards would increase traditional lending by only 0.02%, with 76% of that increase flowing to larger lenders and just 24% to community banks. This contradicts a 2025 ICBA study that claimed $1.3 trillion in potential deposit outflows to digital asset platforms — a figure the White House considers vastly overstated. Market Impact and Data Analysis Quick Take: The draft CLARITY Act has already triggered a "yield migration" within DeFi, as traders move capital out of US-regulated stablecoins toward offshore alternatives. If the final text maintains the passive yield ban, this migration could accelerate — creating regulatory arbitrage opportunities that undermine the Act's stated goal of market integrity. Factor Reg Crypto (SEC) CLARITY Act (Congress) Scope Token fundraising and classification Full market structure and jurisdiction Status At White House OIRA — imminent publication Senate markup targeted late April 2026 Key mechanism Two-tiered safe harbour ($5M/$75M) SEC/CFTC jurisdiction split + stablecoin rules DeFi treatment Indirect — primarily CeFi-focused Outstanding — unresolved provisions Risk factor Congressional pushback possible Community bank deregulation trade; midterm calendar The SEC-CFTC Memorandum of Understanding, signed on March 11, 2026, provides the operational backbone for both regulatory tracks. The MOU addresses six priority areas including product definitions and reporting streamlining, and targets the elimination of duplicative agency registrations that have increased compliance costs for multi-product platforms. Regulatory Landscape: The Push-Pull That Defines This Moment PYMNTS reported, the crypto industry has moved from "a posture of evasion, of building first and litigating later" toward continuous regulatory engagement as a core competitive strategy. Five federal agencies — the SEC, CFTC, FDIC, OCC, and the White House CEA — are now actively coordinating on digital asset policy, a level of interagency alignment unprecedented in crypto's history. SEC Chair Atkins framed this coordination as a design feature, not a coincidence: "We designed it in a way that it would be fair to both startups and incumbents." He added that the SEC wants "people really to experiment within the framework" rather than outside it — a direct rebuke of the Gensler-era approach that pushed innovation offshore. What Happens Next — Predictions First, Reg Crypto will likely be published within weeks. OIRA reviews typically take 30–90 days, and the political will behind this proposal — from the SEC Chair, the White House, and the broader administration — suggests an accelerated timeline. Once published, platforms will have a clear safe harbour for token fundraising, which should trigger a wave of compliant token offerings in Q3 2026. Expect the first projects to file under the $75 million exemption within 60 days of publication. Second, the CLARITY Act markup will be the most consequential 48 hours for crypto policy this year. If the community bank deregulation trade is resolved and the bill advances through committee in late April, it reaches the Senate floor before the midterm campaign season makes controversial votes politically toxic. If it stalls again, Senator Moreno's warning of a years-long delay becomes the base case. The outstanding DeFi provisions, token classification details, and tokenisation treatment represent genuine technical complexity — not political theatre. Third, the stablecoin yield migration will accelerate regardless of legislative outcome. The activity-based rewards compromise satisfies neither the crypto industry (which wants unrestricted yield) nor the banking lobby (which wants a total ban). Capital will continue flowing to jurisdictions with clearer, more permissive stablecoin frameworks — particularly the EU under MiCA and Singapore under the Payment Services Act. The question is whether US regulators accept this leakage as the cost of protecting the banking system, or whether a future Congress revisits the yield provisions entirely. Frequently Asked Questions What is the SEC's Reg Crypto proposal? When will the CLARITY Act pass the Senate? How does the SEC-CFTC asset classification work? What are the CLARITY Act's stablecoin yield rules? How does Reg Crypto affect DeFi protocols? What deadlines should crypto firms watch in 2026? Key dates include the CLARITY Act Senate markup (late April), California Digital Financial Assets Law (July 1), GENIUS Act implementation rules (July 18), CFTC blockchain rules finalisation (August), and the November 3 midterm elections that could shift the policy landscape.
SEC Reg Crypto and CLARITY Act Reshape US Digital Asset…
The conventional wisdom — that Washington moves too slowly to keep pace with crypto innovation — just collided with reality. In the span of three weeks, the SEC sent its landmark "Regulation Crypto" proposal to the White House for final review, the SEC and CFTC formalised a historic jurisdiction-sharing agreement, and the Senate Banking Committee prepared to mark up the CLARITY Act in late April. For brokers, exchanges, and institutional platforms that have spent years operating in regulatory grey zones, the message is unmistakable: the rules are arriving, and they are arriving fast. What makes this moment genuinely different from previous regulatory false starts is its structural completeness. Unlike the piecemeal guidance of 2023–2024 or the enforcement-first posture of the Gensler era, the current framework attacks classification, fundraising, stablecoin governance, and agency jurisdiction simultaneously. Having covered three cycles of "this time it's different" rhetoric in crypto regulation, this is the first where the executive branch, both regulatory agencies, and Congress are moving in the same direction at once. The parallel to the JOBS Act's transformation of equity crowdfunding a decade ago is instructive — and possibly understated. Key Facts SEC's Reg Crypto proposal sent to White House OIRA on April 6, 2026 — one step from publication — CoinDesk, April 7, 2026 Two-tiered safe harbour: $5 million startup exemption (4 years) and $75 million fundraising exemption (12 months) — FinancialContent, April 9, 2026 Bitcoin, Ether, Solana, and XRP reclassified as "Digital Commodities" under CFTC oversight — SEC.gov, March 2026 "Crypto 10" index jumped 12% following the Reg Crypto announcement — FinancialContent, April 9, 2026 Stablecoin market capitalisation exceeded $150 billion with daily volumes regularly surpassing $50 billion — PYMNTS, April 2026 CLARITY Act cleared the House in July 2025; Senate markup targeted for late April 2026 — DL News, 2026 59% of institutions plan to allocate over 5% of AUM to crypto in 2026 — Grayscale, 2026 What Reg Crypto Actually Does — And Why It Matters 2026 midterm elections, signalling the administration's awareness that political winds could shift. Protocol and Industry Response: Who Is Doing What Regulation Crypto Assets framework draws heavily from the bipartisan CLARITY Act, which has given exchanges and platforms a head start on compliance preparation. The joint SEC-CFTC asset classification — which categorises digital assets into five groups: Digital Commodities, Digital Collectibles, Digital Tools, Payment Stablecoins, and Digital Securities — has already shifted operational planning across the industry. Bitcoin, Ether, Solana, and XRP are now classified as "Digital Commodities" under primary CFTC oversight, a move that effectively narrows the SEC's focus to tokens with genuine securities characteristics. For exchanges like Coinbase and Kraken, the reclassification resolves years of legal ambiguity. However, Coinbase's relationship with the regulatory framework remains complicated. The exchange generated approximately $1.35 billion in stablecoin-related revenue in 2025 through its USDC partnership with Circle, and CEO Brian Armstrong has previously stated that "limiting stablecoin rewards could entrench the competitive advantage of banks, particularly in a high interest rate environment where deposit yields remain a key differentiator." DeFi protocols face a more nuanced landscape. While the safe harbour exemptions primarily target centralised token issuance, the CLARITY Act's treatment of decentralised finance remains one of the outstanding issues that must be resolved before the Senate markup can proceed. Protocols like Aave, Uniswap, and MakerDAO are watching closely — their governance structures and token economics sit in the grey zone between the five classification categories. The "Crypto 10" index jumped 12% following the Reg Crypto announcement, and major crypto public companies reached multi-year highs. Markets are pricing in regulatory clarity as a direct catalyst for institutional capital deployment, with Grayscale reporting that 59% of institutional investors plan to allocate over 5% of assets under management to crypto in 2026. The CLARITY Act: Stablecoin Yield and the Final Mile CLARITY Act tackles the harder question of how the entire digital asset market is structured. The bill cleared the House of Representatives in July 2025 but has been stuck in the Senate Banking Committee since January, primarily over a single, fiercely contested provision: stablecoin yield. The compromise, negotiated by Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD), prohibits exchanges and platforms from offering yield or interest directly on stablecoin balances. However, it permits activity-based rewards tied to specific user actions — transactions, payments, remittances, staking, liquidity provision, collateral posting, and governance participation. Loyalty programmes, subscription benefits, and usage rebates also remain permissible. Senator Cynthia Lummis's press team has described the yield negotiations as "99% of the way to resolution," though Senator Bernie Moreno has warned that without advancement by May, digital asset legislation faces a years-long delay as the midterm election cycle dominates the Senate calendar. The Senate returns to full session on April 13, with the Banking Committee markup targeted for the final two weeks of the month. But a late complication has emerged: Senate Banking Republicans are discussing attaching community bank deregulatory provisions to the CLARITY Act as part of a broader legislative trade involving housing policy. Patrick Witt, the White House Crypto Council Executive Director, reportedly appeared "frustrated" after a recent GOP Senate meeting where the proposal was raised. A White House report has pushed back against banking industry concerns, claiming that banning stablecoin rewards would increase traditional lending by only 0.02%, with 76% of that increase flowing to larger lenders and just 24% to community banks. This contradicts a 2025 ICBA study that claimed $1.3 trillion in potential deposit outflows to digital asset platforms — a figure the White House considers vastly overstated. Market Impact and Data Analysis Quick Take: The draft CLARITY Act has already triggered a "yield migration" within DeFi, as traders move capital out of US-regulated stablecoins toward offshore alternatives. If the final text maintains the passive yield ban, this migration could accelerate — creating regulatory arbitrage opportunities that undermine the Act's stated goal of market integrity. Factor Reg Crypto (SEC) CLARITY Act (Congress) Scope Token fundraising and classification Full market structure and jurisdiction Status At White House OIRA — imminent publication Senate markup targeted late April 2026 Key mechanism Two-tiered safe harbour ($5M/$75M) SEC/CFTC jurisdiction split + stablecoin rules DeFi treatment Indirect — primarily CeFi-focused Outstanding — unresolved provisions Risk factor Congressional pushback possible Community bank deregulation trade; midterm calendar The SEC-CFTC Memorandum of Understanding, signed on March 11, 2026, provides the operational backbone for both regulatory tracks. The MOU addresses six priority areas including product definitions and reporting streamlining, and targets the elimination of duplicative agency registrations that have increased compliance costs for multi-product platforms. Regulatory Landscape: The Push-Pull That Defines This Moment PYMNTS reported, the crypto industry has moved from "a posture of evasion, of building first and litigating later" toward continuous regulatory engagement as a core competitive strategy. Five federal agencies — the SEC, CFTC, FDIC, OCC, and the White House CEA — are now actively coordinating on digital asset policy, a level of interagency alignment unprecedented in crypto's history. SEC Chair Atkins framed this coordination as a design feature, not a coincidence: "We designed it in a way that it would be fair to both startups and incumbents." He added that the SEC wants "people really to experiment within the framework" rather than outside it — a direct rebuke of the Gensler-era approach that pushed innovation offshore. What Happens Next — Predictions First, Reg Crypto will likely be published within weeks. OIRA reviews typically take 30–90 days, and the political will behind this proposal — from the SEC Chair, the White House, and the broader administration — suggests an accelerated timeline. Once published, platforms will have a clear safe harbour for token fundraising, which should trigger a wave of compliant token offerings in Q3 2026. Expect the first projects to file under the $75 million exemption within 60 days of publication. Second, the CLARITY Act markup will be the most consequential 48 hours for crypto policy this year. If the community bank deregulation trade is resolved and the bill advances through committee in late April, it reaches the Senate floor before the midterm campaign season makes controversial votes politically toxic. If it stalls again, Senator Moreno's warning of a years-long delay becomes the base case. The outstanding DeFi provisions, token classification details, and tokenisation treatment represent genuine technical complexity — not political theatre. Third, the stablecoin yield migration will accelerate regardless of legislative outcome. The activity-based rewards compromise satisfies neither the crypto industry (which wants unrestricted yield) nor the banking lobby (which wants a total ban). Capital will continue flowing to jurisdictions with clearer, more permissive stablecoin frameworks — particularly the EU under MiCA and Singapore under the Payment Services Act. The question is whether US regulators accept this leakage as the cost of protecting the banking system, or whether a future Congress revisits the yield provisions entirely. Frequently Asked Questions What is the SEC's Reg Crypto proposal? When will the CLARITY Act pass the Senate? How does the SEC-CFTC asset classification work? What are the CLARITY Act's stablecoin yield rules? How does Reg Crypto affect DeFi protocols? What deadlines should crypto firms watch in 2026? Key dates include the CLARITY Act Senate markup (late April), California Digital Financial Assets Law (July 1), GENIUS Act implementation rules (July 18), CFTC blockchain rules finalisation (August), and the November 3 midterm elections that could shift the policy landscape.
Bipartisan ‘Predict Act’ Introduced to Ban…
In a direct legislative response to the explosive growth of political prediction markets, a bipartisan coalition in the U.S. House of Representatives introduced a sweeping bill on Wednesday designed to ban the President, members of Congress, and senior federal officials from betting on the outcomes of government actions and global events. The proposed legislation, titled the Preventing Real-time Exploitation and Deceptive Insider Congressional Trading Act (PREDICT Act), represents the most targeted effort yet to close the regulatory loophole that currently allows public officials to legally wager on policy decisions using platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi. Spearheaded by Representative Adrian Smith (R-NE) and Representative Nikki Budzinski (D-IL), the bill arrives amid mounting scrutiny over the ethical implications of government insiders utilizing decentralized and regulated forecasting platforms. Scope and Mechanics of the PREDICT Act If passed, the PREDICT Act would enact a blanket prohibition on political forecasting trades for the highest echelons of the federal government. The restrictions would explicitly bar the following individuals from participating in prediction markets tied to political events, policy decisions, or government operations: The President and Vice President of the United States. All sitting Members of Congress. High-ranking political appointees, including those serving in Executive Schedule positions. The spouses and dependent children of the aforementioned officials. "Serving the American people is a privilege, not a pathway to profit," Representative Smith stated on Wednesday. "Our commonsense, bipartisan bill will give Americans confidence that the decisions of their elected officials are guided by merit, not personal profit." To enforce the ban, the legislation outlines strict financial penalties. Violators of the PREDICT Act would face a civil fine equal to 10% of the total value of the prohibited contract. Furthermore, individuals would be subject to full disgorgement of any generated profits, which would be redirected into the U.S. Treasury. The Catalyst: Profiting from Geopolitics and Shutdowns The urgency behind the PREDICT Act stems from recent highly publicized trades on prediction networks where anonymous users capitalized heavily on sensitive national security and domestic policy events. Representative Budzinski pointed to these specific instances as the primary catalyst for the legislation, emphasizing the inherent risk of officials weaponizing classified or unreleased information. “The American people are tired of politicians using their influence for personal gain, and the rise of prediction markets has made those concerns even more relevant," Budzinski said. "In recent months, we've seen instances of little-known traders making massive profits on events ranging from war with Iran to how long a government shutdown will last, raising necessary questions about the use of inside information.” A Broader Regulatory Crackdown The introduction of the PREDICT Act is part of a widening, multi-front campaign by U.S. lawmakers to reign in the multi-billion-dollar event contracting industry. The new House bill closely mirrors similar efforts brewing in the Senate. Earlier this month, Democratic lawmakers, led by Senator Chris Murphy, introduced a separate piece of legislation dubbed the BETS OFF Act (Banning Event Trading on Sensitive Operations and Federal Functions). That bill was similarly prompted by allegations that traders may have utilized asymmetrical, inside information to wager on U.S. military actions involving Iran.
Bipartisan ‘Predict Act’ Introduced to Ban…
In a direct legislative response to the explosive growth of political prediction markets, a bipartisan coalition in the U.S. House of Representatives introduced a sweeping bill on Wednesday designed to ban the President, members of Congress, and senior federal officials from betting on the outcomes of government actions and global events. The proposed legislation, titled the Preventing Real-time Exploitation and Deceptive Insider Congressional Trading Act (PREDICT Act), represents the most targeted effort yet to close the regulatory loophole that currently allows public officials to legally wager on policy decisions using platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi. Spearheaded by Representative Adrian Smith (R-NE) and Representative Nikki Budzinski (D-IL), the bill arrives amid mounting scrutiny over the ethical implications of government insiders utilizing decentralized and regulated forecasting platforms. Scope and Mechanics of the PREDICT Act If passed, the PREDICT Act would enact a blanket prohibition on political forecasting trades for the highest echelons of the federal government. The restrictions would explicitly bar the following individuals from participating in prediction markets tied to political events, policy decisions, or government operations: The President and Vice President of the United States. All sitting Members of Congress. High-ranking political appointees, including those serving in Executive Schedule positions. The spouses and dependent children of the aforementioned officials. "Serving the American people is a privilege, not a pathway to profit," Representative Smith stated on Wednesday. "Our commonsense, bipartisan bill will give Americans confidence that the decisions of their elected officials are guided by merit, not personal profit." To enforce the ban, the legislation outlines strict financial penalties. Violators of the PREDICT Act would face a civil fine equal to 10% of the total value of the prohibited contract. Furthermore, individuals would be subject to full disgorgement of any generated profits, which would be redirected into the U.S. Treasury. The Catalyst: Profiting from Geopolitics and Shutdowns The urgency behind the PREDICT Act stems from recent highly publicized trades on prediction networks where anonymous users capitalized heavily on sensitive national security and domestic policy events. Representative Budzinski pointed to these specific instances as the primary catalyst for the legislation, emphasizing the inherent risk of officials weaponizing classified or unreleased information. “The American people are tired of politicians using their influence for personal gain, and the rise of prediction markets has made those concerns even more relevant," Budzinski said. "In recent months, we've seen instances of little-known traders making massive profits on events ranging from war with Iran to how long a government shutdown will last, raising necessary questions about the use of inside information.” A Broader Regulatory Crackdown The introduction of the PREDICT Act is part of a widening, multi-front campaign by U.S. lawmakers to reign in the multi-billion-dollar event contracting industry. The new House bill closely mirrors similar efforts brewing in the Senate. Earlier this month, Democratic lawmakers, led by Senator Chris Murphy, introduced a separate piece of legislation dubbed the BETS OFF Act (Banning Event Trading on Sensitive Operations and Federal Functions). That bill was similarly prompted by allegations that traders may have utilized asymmetrical, inside information to wager on U.S. military actions involving Iran.