2 stories credited to The Daily Boulder
Latest story Apr 19, 2026 · on ChamberLight since Apr 2026
Scores for The Daily Boulder
Writing quality not enough rated stories yet: 2 of 10. How it is measured
Scores last checked Sep 25, 2026.
Stories ChamberLight collected, by month
Stories credited to The Daily Boulder, by publication date. ChamberLight collects articles that mention the officials it tracks, so this shows its own coverage of this source, not how much the source publishes.
- Stories from The Daily Boulder
- Shaded: ChamberLight collected no stories, or almost none, from any outlet (a gap in its collection, not in the outlet’s publishing)
Show as a table
| Month | Stories | All outlets |
|---|---|---|
| March 2026 | 1 | 181 |
| April 2026 | 1 | 4,537 |
| May 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| June 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| July 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| August 2026 | 0 | 1 (collection gap) |
| September 2026 | 0 | 598 |
Top topics
Share of this source’s stories tagged with each topic. A story can carry several topics, so the shares do not add up to 100%.
- Ethics/Corruption2
100% of 2 stories · 57% across all outlets
- Budget/Spending1
50% of 2 stories · 31% across all outlets
- Criminal Justice1
50% of 2 stories · 19% across all outlets
- Defense/Military1
50% of 2 stories · 24% across all outlets
The thin mark on each bar is the topic’s share across all outlets.
Who they cover
Party of the officials these stories are mainly about, across all 2 officials named. A story counts once for each official it is mainly about, so the split is over 2 story–official pairs, from 2 stories.
- Republican50% · 1 pair
- Party not recorded50% · 1 pair
Most covered
Stories mainly about each official, and their share of the source’s 2 stories.
Article tone
ChamberLight’s article analysis assigns each story a tone toward the official it covers. It describes the coverage of that official, not The Daily Boulder’s stance, and reader votes do not change it. 2 stories.
- Good Look
- 0 (0%)
- Mixed
- 1 (50%)
- Informational
- 0 (0%)
- Bad Look
- 1 (50%)
Challenges to these scores
No one has challenged a score on this page yet. Anyone can; editors publish every outcome here.
Articles served from dailyboulder.com
2
‘Find the Truth’: Marjorie Taylor Greene Fuels Doubts About Trump Assassination Attempt
Some corners of MAGA world are increasingly questioning the July 2024 assassination attempt targeting Donald Trump. And now, Marjorie Taylor Greene is adding fuel to the fire. Over the weekend, Greene took to social media to amplify a post from Trisha Hope, a self-described “J6 activist,” who suggested there’s something suspicious about the shooting at Trump’s Pennsylvania rally. Among the claims: the timing of a widely circulated photo of Trump and the president’s reluctance to discuss the incident in detail. Hope went even further, pushing a theory that Corey Comperatore—who was killed while shielding his family—was somehow “used in the plot” to make the attack appear real. Greene didn’t outright endorse that claim, but she made it clear she thinks something isn’t adding up. “Extremely important post worth the read and consideration,” Greene wrote. She added that Comperatore’s family “deserves to know the truth” about the shooter, Matthew Crooks, and questioned why Trump himself isn’t “leading the charge” for answers. “That’s the question,” she said pointedly. (Screenshot: X) Her comments come as conspiracy theories about the shooting continue to spread among prominent Trump allies. Figures like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and others in right-wing media circles have all hinted that the official story doesn’t hold up. Even some Republican lawmakers have raised concerns. Reps. Mike Kelly and Pat Fallon previously accused the FBI of “stonewalling” a House probe into the attack—despite the bureau’s final report concluding the shooter acted alone. As for Trump, he’s largely avoided revisiting the incident. In a 2025 interview with the BBC, he said he doesn’t like “dwelling” on it. Still, the imagery of that day has remained central to his political brand. At the 2024 Republican National Convention, Trump appeared with a bandage on his ear after it was “grazed” by a bullet. And after returning to the White House, he prominently displayed a painting based on the now-famous photo of himself with a raised fist taken moments after the shooting. Now, with allies like Greene publicly questioning the narrative, the conspiracy chatter shows no signs of slowing down.
Kristi Noem’s ‘Glamour Shots’ Removed From DHS Halls — Staff Celebrate
It didn’t take long. Days after Kristi Noem was pushed out of the Department of Homeland Security, the walls started changing—and inside the building, people were apparently more than happy to help. According to The Washington Examiner, DHS employees quietly celebrated as multiple framed photos of the former secretary—described by staff as “glamour shots”—were taken down from the agency’s headquarters. The removal started even before Noem officially exited the job. More than 10 framed photos of her were pulled from the walls of her workspace at Customs and Border Protection in Washington, D.C., sources told The Examiner. The images had been prominently displayed throughout the office, creating what some staff saw as an over-the-top, personality-driven makeover of a federal agency workspace. Noem’s tenure ended abruptly on March 5, when President Donald Trump fired her following months of controversy and two tough congressional hearings. Instead of disappearing entirely, she was reassigned to a new and largely undefined role as special envoy to something called “The Shield of the Americas.” Meanwhile, Markwayne Mullin, a former Republican senator from Oklahoma, was sworn in as her replacement this week. But inside DHS, the more immediate shift wasn’t policy—it was décor. The photos in question had reportedly gone up early last year, part of a rapid office redesign carried out by Noem’s team. In the process, images of rank-and-file federal agents were removed and replaced with multiple portraits of Noem herself—something that didn’t exactly go over well internally. “Every single picture had a picture of Noem, and it was such a turn off,” one unnamed official said. The reaction from staff, according to the report, ranged from eye-rolling to outright mockery. “People were snickering about it, like, ‘Did you see the upgrade?’” the official added. “No leader that I know would have allowed that to happen. If they walked in and saw their photo in every picture, they would say, ‘What were you thinking?’” That sentiment appears to explain why the photos didn’t last long once her position did. As soon as the transition began, the portraits started coming down—one by one—effectively undoing a visual overhaul that had drawn quiet criticism for months. No official statement has been made about the removal of the photos, and DHS has not publicly addressed the report. But inside the building, the walls are going back to normal. And judging by the reaction, that’s exactly how a lot of people there want it.