Skip to main content

Search

Search people, articles, bills, and more

dad29.blogspot.com logo

dad29.blogspot.com

BlogProvenance not yet reviewed

1 story credited to dad29.blogspot.com

Latest story Apr 15, 2026 · on ChamberLight since Apr 2026 · on blogspot.com

A story can appear as several articles (copies of the same piece), so counts of stories and of articles differ.

Compare with another source

Scores for dad29.blogspot.com

Credibility

Not enough stories yet: 1 of 10.

How this is measured

Political lean

Not enough stories yet: 1 of 10.

How this is measured

Originality

Not enough stories yet: 1 of 10.

How this is measured

Writing quality not enough rated stories yet: 1 of 10. How it is measured

Scores last checked Sep 24, 2026.

Stories ChamberLight collected, by month

Stories credited to dad29.blogspot.com, by publication date. ChamberLight collects articles that mention the officials it tracks, so this shows its own coverage of this source, not how much the source publishes.

  • Stories from dad29.blogspot.com
  • Shaded: ChamberLight collected no stories, or almost none, from any outlet (a gap in its collection, not in the outlet’s publishing)
Show as a table
MonthStoriesAll outlets
April 202612,576
May 20260none collected
June 20260none collected
July 20260none collected
August 202601 (collection gap)
September 20260598

Top topics

Share of this source’s stories tagged with each topic. A story can carry several topics, so the shares do not add up to 100%.

  • Budget/Spending1

    100% of 1 stories · 33% across all outlets

  • Ethics/Corruption1

    100% of 1 stories · 62% across all outlets

  • Taxes1

    100% of 1 stories · 5% across all outlets

The thin mark on each bar is the topic’s share across all outlets.

Who they cover

Party of the officials these stories are mainly about, across all 2 officials named. A story counts once for each official it is mainly about, so the split is over 2 story–official pairs, from 1 story.

  • Republican100% · 2 pairs

Most covered

Stories mainly about each official, and their share of the source’s 1 story.

  1. 1Nancy MaceR1 story · 100%
  2. 2Thomas MassieR1 story · 100%

Article tone

ChamberLight’s article analysis assigns each story a tone toward the official it covers. It describes the coverage of that official, not dad29.blogspot.com’s stance, and reader votes do not change it. 1 story.

Good Look
1 (100%)
Mixed
0 (0%)
Informational
0 (0%)
Bad Look
0 (0%)

Challenges to these scores

No one has challenged a score on this page yet. Anyone can; editors publish every outcome here.

Articles served from dad29.blogspot.com

2

Congress Buries Most of the Dirt

For all the hullabaloo, Swalwell is only one of dozens?  hundreds?  in Congress who have been .....ahhhhh......doing the naughties to their staff or random other women and men. But you will never know who they are, unless they represent a problem to other politicians, like Swalwell does. Mind you, this is your money.     Nearly all members of Congress, 357 Republicans and Democrats, don’t want taxpayers to know which members have used  taxpayer funds to pay sexual harassment claims.  An untold number of members of Congress have spent a combined roughly $17 million of taxpayer money to settle sexual harassment claims made against them, according to House records, U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie, R-KY, says. U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, R-SC, this week proposed forcing a vote on a resolution she filed directing the U.S. House Committee on Ethics to “preserve and publicly release all records related to investigations into Members of Congress for sexual harassment, unwelcome sexual advances, and sexual assault under House rules.”...  The majority of Congress on Wednesday, 357, disagreed. Nearly all Republicans, 175, and nearly all Democrats, 182, voted to refer the resolution to the committee, essentially killing it.... There was a roll-call vote.  That means that you can find out how YOUR Congress-slime voted. Odds are he/she/it voted to keep it all a secret, following the tradition established by none other than Paul Ryan--another holy-picture poser.  From Wisconsin?  Here are your Congress-members who voted to keep it all secret.  Tiffany, Grothman, Steil, Van Orden, Fitzgerald, Wied, and Moore.  You won't hear about that from the WISN/WIBA Kissers of Republican Ass.

Apr 15, 20268 votes

Congress Buries Most of the Dirt

For all the hullabaloo, Swalwell is only one of dozens?  hundreds?  in Congress who have been .....ahhhhh......doing the naughties to their staff or random other women and men. But you will never know who they are, unless they represent a problem to other politicians, like Swalwell does. Mind you, this is your money.     Nearly all members of Congress, 357 Republicans and Democrats, don’t want taxpayers to know which members have used  taxpayer funds to pay sexual harassment claims.  An untold number of members of Congress have spent a combined roughly $17 million of taxpayer money to settle sexual harassment claims made against them, according to House records, U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie, R-KY, says. U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, R-SC, this week proposed forcing a vote on a resolution she filed directing the U.S. House Committee on Ethics to “preserve and publicly release all records related to investigations into Members of Congress for sexual harassment, unwelcome sexual advances, and sexual assault under House rules.”...  The majority of Congress on Wednesday, 357, disagreed. Nearly all Republicans, 175, and nearly all Democrats, 182, voted to refer the resolution to the committee, essentially killing it.... There was a roll-call vote.  That means that you can find out how YOUR Congress-slime voted. Odds are he/she/it voted to keep it all a secret, following the tradition established by none other than Paul Ryan--another holy-picture poser.  From Wisconsin?  Here are your Congress-members who voted to keep it all secret.  Tiffany, Grothman, Steil, Van Orden, Fitzgerald, Wied, and Moore.  You won't hear about that from the WISN/WIBA Kissers of Republican Ass.

Apr 15, 202610 votes