3 stories credited to CoinPedia
Latest story Apr 21, 2026 · on ChamberLight since Apr 2026
A story can appear as several articles (copies of the same piece), so counts of stories and of articles differ.
Scores for CoinPedia
Writing quality not enough rated stories yet: 1 of 10. How it is measured
Scores last checked Sep 25, 2026.
Stories ChamberLight collected, by month
Stories credited to CoinPedia, by publication date. ChamberLight collects articles that mention the officials it tracks, so this shows its own coverage of this source, not how much the source publishes.
- Stories from CoinPedia
- Shaded: ChamberLight collected no stories, or almost none, from any outlet (a gap in its collection, not in the outlet’s publishing)
Show as a table
| Month | Stories | All outlets |
|---|---|---|
| March 2026 | 2 | 365 |
| April 2026 | 1 | 4,538 |
| May 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| June 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| July 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| August 2026 | 0 | 1 (collection gap) |
| September 2026 | 0 | 1,320 |
Top topics
Share of this source’s stories tagged with each topic. A story can carry several topics, so the shares do not add up to 100%.
- Economy3
100% of 3 stories · 26% across all outlets
- Technology/Privacy3
100% of 3 stories · 10% across all outlets
- Budget/Spending1
33% of 3 stories · 31% across all outlets
- Ethics/Corruption1
33% of 3 stories · 58% across all outlets
- Voting Rights1
33% of 3 stories · 19% across all outlets
The thin mark on each bar is the topic’s share across all outlets.
Who they cover
Party of the officials these stories are mainly about, across all 4 officials named. A story counts once for each official it is mainly about, so the split is over 6 story–official pairs, from 3 stories.
- Republican83% · 5 pairs
- Democrat17% · 1 pair
Most covered
Stories mainly about each official, and their share of the source’s 3 stories.
Article tone
ChamberLight’s article analysis assigns each story a tone toward the official it covers. It describes the coverage of that official, not CoinPedia’s stance, and reader votes do not change it. 3 stories.
- Good Look
- 0 (0%)
- Mixed
- 3 (100%)
- Informational
- 0 (0%)
- Bad Look
- 0 (0%)
Challenges to these scores
No one has challenged a score on this page yet. Anyone can; editors publish every outcome here.
Articles served from coinpedia.org
6
Follow the Money: The 5 Cryptos Favored by US Congress Members
The post Follow the Money: The 5 Cryptos Favored by US Congress Members appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Under the 2012 STOCK (Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge) Act, congressional members and other government employees are mandated to report stocks, bonds, and cryptocurrency trades of over $1,000 within 45 days of executing them. Here is a compilation of the top 5 crypto choices, and a few little-known extra choices: Top 5 crypto choices in the US Congress The first is Bitcoin (BTC), the most widely held asset among legislators. Wyoming Senator (Sen.) Cynthia Lummis, a prominent speaker on crypto policy, disclosed her first Bitcoin purchase in 2013. Others who have made BTC purchases include Sen. Ted Cruz and Representatives (Rep.) Byron Donalds and Guy Reschenthaler, with reports of individual holdings worth up to $250,000. Other lawmakers, such as Rep. Sheri Biggs and Sen. Dave McCormick, have Bitcoin exposure through ETFs from Valkyrie, VanEck, and Ether. Meanwhile, a couple of others, such as Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, have invested in Bitcoin-related companies, including PayPal, BlackRock, and The Block (formerly Square). The second is Ethereum (ETH), held by members of Congress such as Reps. Mike Collins and Barry Moore, with the former holding up to $60,000 in ETH. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Sen. Dave McCormick have invested in Ethereum ETFs. Third is Solana (SOL) and fourth is XRP, both reported by Rep. Guy Reschenthaler, and each valued at up to $15,000. Fifth is Cardano (ADA), disclosed by Reps. Barry Moore and Mike Collins, with the former holding a portion worth up to $45,000. Little-known coins While the above constitute the top 12 crypto coins by market cap, policymakers have also made some outlier investments. Rep. Mike Collins purchased the Ski Mask Dog (SKI), while Rep. Madison Cawthorn held and promoted the LGB Coin. Other coins in this category include The Graph (GRT), Velodrome (VELO), and Aerodrome Finance (AERO). In the past 24 hours, all these cryptocurrencies have gained between 1.8% and 4% following shifts in the geopolitical and macroeconomic environment. Source: CoinMarketCap SKI, however, stands out, having dropped 2.86%. Source: CoinMarketCap
Follow the Money: The 5 Cryptos Favored by US Congress Members
The post Follow the Money: The 5 Cryptos Favored by US Congress Members appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Under the 2012 STOCK (Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge) Act, congressional members and other government employees are mandated to report stocks, bonds, and cryptocurrency trades of over $1,000 within 45 days of executing them. Here is a compilation of the top 5 crypto choices, and a few little-known extra choices: Top 5 crypto choices in the US Congress The first is Bitcoin (BTC), the most widely held asset among legislators. Wyoming Senator (Sen.) Cynthia Lummis, a prominent speaker on crypto policy, disclosed her first Bitcoin purchase in 2013. Others who have made BTC purchases include Sen. Ted Cruz and Representatives (Rep.) Byron Donalds and Guy Reschenthaler, with reports of individual holdings worth up to $250,000. Other lawmakers, such as Rep. Sheri Biggs and Sen. Dave McCormick, have Bitcoin exposure through ETFs from Valkyrie, VanEck, and Ether. Meanwhile, a couple of others, such as Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, have invested in Bitcoin-related companies, including PayPal, BlackRock, and The Block (formerly Square). The second is Ethereum (ETH), held by members of Congress such as Reps. Mike Collins and Barry Moore, with the former holding up to $60,000 in ETH. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Sen. Dave McCormick have invested in Ethereum ETFs. Third is Solana (SOL) and fourth is XRP, both reported by Rep. Guy Reschenthaler, and each valued at up to $15,000. Fifth is Cardano (ADA), disclosed by Reps. Barry Moore and Mike Collins, with the former holding a portion worth up to $45,000. Little-known coins While the above constitute the top 12 crypto coins by market cap, policymakers have also made some outlier investments. Rep. Mike Collins purchased the Ski Mask Dog (SKI), while Rep. Madison Cawthorn held and promoted the LGB Coin. Other coins in this category include The Graph (GRT), Velodrome (VELO), and Aerodrome Finance (AERO). In the past 24 hours, all these cryptocurrencies have gained between 1.8% and 4% following shifts in the geopolitical and macroeconomic environment. Source: CoinMarketCap SKI, however, stands out, having dropped 2.86%. Source: CoinMarketCap
Coinbase-Backed Group Mobilizes Voting for Pro-Crypto Midterm Candidates
The post Coinbase-Backed Group Mobilizes Voting for Pro-Crypto Midterm Candidates appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Stand With Crypto (SWC), a Coinbase-led advocacy group, has announced a voter mobilization drive intended to endorse crypto-supporting candidates for the November midterm elections. The team will focus on swing states such as Arizona and Pennsylvania, employing a dual strategy to advance their mission. SWC will encourage the use of its new voter hub, an online platform that showcases electoral candidates and their stances on cryptocurrency issues. The group will also issue its November 2025 questionnaire to vet politicians on matters of blockchain and digital assets. Coinbase pushes for crypto-inclined lawmakers Crypto PACs (Cryptocurrency Political Action Committees) have emerged as some of the most influential forces in US politics due to the massive funding they provide. Other than Coinbase, key players of these organizations include Kraken, Ripple Labs, Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), the Winklevoss twins, and Jump Crypto. In 2024, crypto PACs donated more than $245 million towards political campaigns. This was about half of all corporate donations received during that period. Beneficiaries of the PACs include President Donald Trump and representatives Pat Ryan and Josh Riley, while victims include Sherrod Brown, the former Senate Banking Chair and a prominent cryptocurrency critic. Having risen to about 18 groups, crypto PACs have now amassed a $271+ million war chest for the 2026 midterm elections. SWC alone has more than 2.7 million members, and its affiliate, the Super PAC Fairshake, has already raised $190M+ for the upcoming elections. Crypto lobbying moves to the grassroots The crypto PACs initiative signals technological championship, working bottom-up rather than waiting to react to policies after development. Their work also makes crypto hostility potentially politically damaging. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has recently stalled the development of the Clarity Act, calling the ban on stablecoin yield a damaging move. Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis, among others, has called for a compromise between banks and crypto companies on stablecoin matters, arguing that further delays could push the agenda into 2030. Dear @brian_armstrong , It’s time to stop. This started back in January with a narrative that made sense — letting people earn with their own money. Respect for that. But now, enough. You’re protecting your business. Fair. But this industry is bigger than @coinbase . If this… — Nico Cabrera (@NicoCabrera92) March 25, 2026
Coinbase Rejects the Clarity Act Draft as Stablecoin Yield Fight Escalates
The post Coinbase Rejects the Clarity Act Draft as Stablecoin Yield Fight Escalates appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Coinbase, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the US, has expressed disapproval of the latest draft of the Clarity Act, which seeks to ban yields on stablecoins. Speaking in Senate offices during a Monday meeting, the company expressed concerns about the bill’s language and its intentions, saying it rejects the compromise meant to level the playing field between cryptocurrency companies and banks. Coinbase opposes Clarity Act draft Recently, Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks led the development of a draft to accelerate the bill’s passage through the Senate. The document addressed the long-standing debate on stablecoin yields, which banks claimed created unfair competition to their fiat deposits. More specifically, the bill proposed a restriction on interest from passive stablecoin deposits in favor of “active rewards.” Following its development, the above senators expressed optimism that the much-delayed act would receive Senatorial approval, but this seems to have hit a wall with Coinbase’s latest stance. Clarity Act faces new headwinds Notably, Coinbase is a major sponsor of the Fairshale Super PAC network – a massive bipartisan political organization dedicated to electing crypto and blockchain advocates into the US Congress. The group’s prominence in American politics has grown considerably following its multi-million dollar electoral donations to President Donald Trump. Senators and other politicians, therefore, risk defunding if Coinbase’s conditions regarding the Clarity Act are not met. The release of the draft already caused a drop in Coinbase’s stock price to below $200, a level it has yet to recover from, with shares closing at $181.10. Source: MarketWatch Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis has called for a compromise, saying further delays would harm America’s financial future. Community reaction shows deep disappointment at yet another delay, while others argue that banks actually need protection because of the current enormous debt burden. I know patience is required in this industry, but it seems like a deal has been imminent for months now. Is clarity coming in 2026, or 2027? — Nicholas Urso (@Nicksobtc) March 25, 2026
Coinbase Rejects the Clarity Act Draft as Stablecoin Yield Fight Escalates
The post Coinbase Rejects the Clarity Act Draft as Stablecoin Yield Fight Escalates appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Coinbase, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the US, has expressed disapproval of the latest draft of the Clarity Act, which seeks to ban yields on stablecoins. Speaking in Senate offices during a Monday meeting, the company expressed concerns about the bill’s language and its intentions, saying it rejects the compromise meant to level the playing field between cryptocurrency companies and banks. Coinbase opposes Clarity Act draft Recently, Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks led the development of a draft to accelerate the bill’s passage through the Senate. The document addressed the long-standing debate on stablecoin yields, which banks claimed created unfair competition to their fiat deposits. More specifically, the bill proposed a restriction on interest from passive stablecoin deposits in favor of “active rewards.” Following its development, the above senators expressed optimism that the much-delayed act would receive Senatorial approval, but this seems to have hit a wall with Coinbase’s latest stance. Clarity Act faces new headwinds Notably, Coinbase is a major sponsor of the Fairshale Super PAC network – a massive bipartisan political organization dedicated to electing crypto and blockchain advocates into the US Congress. The group’s prominence in American politics has grown considerably following its multi-million dollar electoral donations to President Donald Trump. Senators and other politicians, therefore, risk defunding if Coinbase’s conditions regarding the Clarity Act are not met. The release of the draft already caused a drop in Coinbase’s stock price to below $200, a level it has yet to recover from, with shares closing at $181.10. Source: MarketWatch Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis has called for a compromise, saying further delays would harm America’s financial future. Community reaction shows deep disappointment at yet another delay, while others argue that banks actually need protection because of the current enormous debt burden. I know patience is required in this industry, but it seems like a deal has been imminent for months now. Is clarity coming in 2026, or 2027? — Nicholas Urso (@Nicksobtc) March 25, 2026
Coinbase Rejects the Clarity Act Draft as Stablecoin Yield Fight Escalates
The post Coinbase Rejects the Clarity Act Draft as Stablecoin Yield Fight Escalates appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Coinbase, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the US, has expressed disapproval of the latest draft of the Clarity Act, which seeks to ban yields on stablecoins. Speaking in Senate offices during a Monday meeting, the company expressed concerns about the bill’s language and its intentions, saying it rejects the compromise meant to level the playing field between cryptocurrency companies and banks. Coinbase opposes Clarity Act draft Recently, Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks led the development of a draft to accelerate the bill’s passage through the Senate. The document addressed the long-standing debate on stablecoin yields, which banks claimed created unfair competition to their fiat deposits. More specifically, the bill proposed a restriction on interest from passive stablecoin deposits in favor of “active rewards.” Following its development, the above senators expressed optimism that the much-delayed act would receive Senatorial approval, but this seems to have hit a wall with Coinbase’s latest stance. Clarity Act faces new headwinds Notably, Coinbase is a major sponsor of the Fairshale Super PAC network – a massive bipartisan political organization dedicated to electing crypto and blockchain advocates into the US Congress. The group’s prominence in American politics has grown considerably following its multi-million dollar electoral donations to President Donald Trump. Senators and other politicians, therefore, risk defunding if Coinbase’s conditions regarding the Clarity Act are not met. The release of the draft already caused a drop in Coinbase’s stock price to below $200, a level it has yet to recover from, with shares closing at $181.10. Source: MarketWatch Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis has called for a compromise, saying further delays would harm America’s financial future. Community reaction shows deep disappointment at yet another delay, while others argue that banks actually need protection because of the current enormous debt burden. I know patience is required in this industry, but it seems like a deal has been imminent for months now. Is clarity coming in 2026, or 2027? — Nicholas Urso (@Nicksobtc) March 25, 2026