1 story credited to League of American Bicyclists
Latest story Apr 21, 2026 · on ChamberLight since Apr 2026
A story can appear as several articles (copies of the same piece), so counts of stories and of articles differ.
Scores for League of American Bicyclists
Writing quality not enough rated stories yet: 1 of 10. How it is measured
Scores last checked Sep 25, 2026.
Stories ChamberLight collected, by month
Stories credited to League of American Bicyclists, by publication date. ChamberLight collects articles that mention the officials it tracks, so this shows its own coverage of this source, not how much the source publishes.
- Stories from League of American Bicyclists
- Shaded: ChamberLight collected no stories, or almost none, from any outlet (a gap in its collection, not in the outlet’s publishing)
Show as a table
| Month | Stories | All outlets |
|---|---|---|
| April 2026 | 1 | 477 |
| May 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| June 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| July 2026 | 0 | none collected |
| August 2026 | 0 | 1 (collection gap) |
| September 2026 | 0 | 598 |
Top topics
Share of this source’s stories tagged with each topic. A story can carry several topics, so the shares do not add up to 100%.
- Budget/Spending1
100% of 1 stories · 30% across all outlets
- Environment/Climate1
100% of 1 stories · 4% across all outlets
- Infrastructure1
100% of 1 stories · 7% across all outlets
The thin mark on each bar is the topic’s share across all outlets.
Who they cover
Party of the officials these stories are mainly about, across all 3 officials named. A story counts once for each official it is mainly about, so the split is over 3 story–official pairs, from 1 story.
- Republican67% · 2 pairs
- Democrat33% · 1 pair
Most covered
Stories mainly about each official, and their share of the source’s 1 story.
Article tone
ChamberLight’s article analysis assigns each story a tone toward the official it covers. It describes the coverage of that official, not League of American Bicyclists’s stance, and reader votes do not change it. 1 story.
- Good Look
- 1 (100%)
- Mixed
- 0 (0%)
- Informational
- 0 (0%)
- Bad Look
- 0 (0%)
Challenges to these scores
No one has challenged a score on this page yet. Anyone can; editors publish every outcome here.
Articles served from bikeleague.org
3
Transportation Reauthorization is Coming
We should know in the next few weeks what the first draft of the bill that will decide transportation funding and policy priorities for the next five years looks like. As we’ve written before, the lead author of the bill, Representative Sam Graves (R-MO), has said it will be a “traditional” bill that doesn’t fund biking or walking infrastructure. On the other hand, he has also said he wants this to be a bipartisan bill and it’s unlikely Representative Rick Larsen (D-WA), the ranking Democrat on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, would back a reauthorization bill that zeros out funding for bicycling and walking infrastructure. But debates over the merits of bicycling and walking funding will continue. Last week, Representative Scott Perry (R-PA) introduced a bill that would eliminate Transportation Alternatives – the largest bucket of federal funding for things like bike lanes, sidewalks and trails. That bill is unlikely to go anywhere (Perry doesn’t have a very successful track record of getting legislation passed into law), but it is indicative of the type of thinking among certain members of the House Transportation Committee. We need to push back on that kind of thinking. We oppose any reduction in Transportation Alternatives funds – we want to strengthen the program – and while we believe a complete zeroing out is unlikely, we believe strong advocacy may be required to ensure there is no reduction in the next five years of funding. When the first draft of the reauthorization bill is released, we’ll be looking for our priorities and asking you to lend your voice in support of better biking. Those include: Robust funding for Transportation Alternatives Legislative language of the Sarah Debbink Langenkamp Active Transportation Act and the Magnus White and Safe Streets for Everyone Act Reauthorization and fund for the Safe Streets and Roads for All grant program We’ll also be scouring the bill for any changes to language around vulnerable road users, local match requirements for federal grants, policy changes, and other bills like the BIKE Act. Join us in our efforts to Save America’s Bike Lanes and send a letter to your Member of Congress today » The post Transportation Reauthorization is Coming appeared first on League of American Bicyclists.
Transportation Reauthorization is Coming
We should know in the next few weeks what the first draft of the bill that will decide transportation funding and policy priorities for the next five years looks like. As we’ve written before, the lead author of the bill, Representative Sam Graves (R-MO), has said it will be a “traditional” bill that doesn’t fund biking or walking infrastructure. On the other hand, he has also said he wants this to be a bipartisan bill and it’s unlikely Representative Rick Larsen (D-WA), the ranking Democrat on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, would back a reauthorization bill that zeros out funding for bicycling and walking infrastructure. But debates over the merits of bicycling and walking funding will continue. Last week, Representative Scott Perry (R-PA) introduced a bill that would eliminate Transportation Alternatives – the largest bucket of federal funding for things like bike lanes, sidewalks and trails. That bill is unlikely to go anywhere (Perry doesn’t have a very successful track record of getting legislation passed into law), but it is indicative of the type of thinking among certain members of the House Transportation Committee. We need to push back on that kind of thinking. We oppose any reduction in Transportation Alternatives funds – we want to strengthen the program – and while we believe a complete zeroing out is unlikely, we believe strong advocacy may be required to ensure there is no reduction in the next five years of funding. When the first draft of the reauthorization bill is released, we’ll be looking for our priorities and asking you to lend your voice in support of better biking. Those include: Robust funding for Transportation Alternatives Legislative language of the Sarah Debbink Langenkamp Active Transportation Act and the Magnus White and Safe Streets for Everyone Act Reauthorization and fund for the Safe Streets and Roads for All grant program We’ll also be scouring the bill for any changes to language around vulnerable road users, local match requirements for federal grants, policy changes, and other bills like the BIKE Act. Join us in our efforts to Save America’s Bike Lanes and send a letter to your Member of Congress today » The post Transportation Reauthorization is Coming appeared first on League of American Bicyclists.
Transportation Reauthorization is Coming
We should know in the next few weeks what the first draft of the bill that will decide transportation funding and policy priorities for the next five years looks like. As we’ve written before, the lead author of the bill, Representative Sam Graves (R-MO), has said it will be a “traditional” bill that doesn’t fund biking or walking infrastructure. On the other hand, he has also said he wants this to be a bipartisan bill and it’s unlikely Representative Rick Larsen (D-WA), the ranking Democrat on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, would back a reauthorization bill that zeros out funding for bicycling and walking infrastructure. But debates over the merits of bicycling and walking funding will continue. Last week, Representative Scott Perry (R-PA) introduced a bill that would eliminate Transportation Alternatives – the largest bucket of federal funding for things like bike lanes, sidewalks and trails. That bill is unlikely to go anywhere (Perry doesn’t have a very successful track record of getting legislation passed into law), but it is indicative of the type of thinking among certain members of the House Transportation Committee. We need to push back on that kind of thinking. We oppose any reduction in Transportation Alternatives funds – we want to strengthen the program – and while we believe a complete zeroing out is unlikely, we believe strong advocacy may be required to ensure there is no reduction in the next five years of funding. When the first draft of the reauthorization bill is released, we’ll be looking for our priorities and asking you to lend your voice in support of better biking. Those include: Robust funding for Transportation Alternatives Legislative language of the Sarah Debbink Langenkamp Active Transportation Act and the Magnus White and Safe Streets for Everyone Act Reauthorization and fund for the Safe Streets and Roads for All grant program We’ll also be scouring the bill for any changes to language around vulnerable road users, local match requirements for federal grants, policy changes, and other bills like the BIKE Act. Join us in our efforts to Save America’s Bike Lanes and send a letter to your Member of Congress today » The post Transportation Reauthorization is Coming appeared first on League of American Bicyclists.