Skip to main content

Search

Search people, articles, bills, and more

19FortyFive logo

19FortyFive

19fortyfive.com

Trade PressProvenance not yet reviewed

2 stories credited to 19FortyFive

Latest story Apr 14, 2026 · on ChamberLight since Apr 2026

Scores for 19FortyFive

Credibility

Not enough stories yet: 1 of 10.

How this is measured

Political lean

Not enough stories yet: 1 of 10.

How this is measured

Originality

Not enough stories yet: 2 of 10.

How this is measured

Writing quality not enough rated stories yet: 1 of 10. How it is measured

Scores last checked Sep 25, 2026.

Stories ChamberLight collected, by month

Stories credited to 19FortyFive, by publication date. ChamberLight collects articles that mention the officials it tracks, so this shows its own coverage of this source, not how much the source publishes.

  • Stories from 19FortyFive
  • Shaded: ChamberLight collected no stories, or almost none, from any outlet (a gap in its collection, not in the outlet’s publishing)
Show as a table
MonthStoriesAll outlets
March 20261215
April 202614,537
May 20260none collected
June 20260none collected
July 20260none collected
August 202601 (collection gap)
September 20260598

Top topics

Share of this source’s stories tagged with each topic. A story can carry several topics, so the shares do not add up to 100%.

  • Defense/Military2

    100% of 2 stories · 24% across all outlets

  • Foreign Policy2

    100% of 2 stories · 28% across all outlets

  • Budget/Spending1

    50% of 2 stories · 30% across all outlets

  • Veterans Affairs1

    50% of 2 stories · 1% across all outlets

The thin mark on each bar is the topic’s share across all outlets.

Who they cover

Party of the officials these stories are mainly about, across all 2 officials named. A story counts once for each official it is mainly about, so the split is over 2 story–official pairs, from 2 stories.

  • Republican100% · 2 pairs

Most covered

Stories mainly about each official, and their share of the source’s 2 stories.

  1. 1Sheri BiggsR1 story · 50%
  2. 2Tommy TubervilleR1 story · 50%

Article tone

ChamberLight’s article analysis assigns each story a tone toward the official it covers. It describes the coverage of that official, not 19FortyFive’s stance, and reader votes do not change it. 2 stories.

Good Look
0 (0%)
Mixed
2 (100%)
Informational
0 (0%)
Bad Look
0 (0%)

Challenges to these scores

No one has challenged a score on this page yet. Anyone can; editors publish every outcome here.

Articles served from 19fortyfive.com

2

Psychology Suggests the ‘On-Again, Off-Again’ War Is the Most Psychologically Damaging Kind. U.S. Troops and Their Families Are Living It.

Mental Health and Psychological Stress In The On-Again, Off-Again Campaign Against Iran: US military warfighters facing the threats associated with combat operations over Iran are experiencing significant mental strain, characterized by high-stakes operational pressure, increased combat fatigue, and questions as to whether they will complete the mission.  While resilient, many are grappling with the psychological impact of repeated, high-tempo, and long-duration operations. Like their grandfathers who fought in the skies over Europe in World War II, the aircrews handled the extreme mental stress of the air war over Germany through a combination of close-knit squadron camaraderie, dark humor, strict adherence to duty, escapism during time off, and fatalism.  U.S. Air Force Airman 1st Class Colin Stocks, 492nd Fighter Generation Squadron electrical and environmental systems apprentice, performs post-flight inspections on a U.S. Air Force F-15E Strike Eagle for takeoff during Exercise Ocean Sky 25 at Gando Air Base, Spain, Oct. 23, 2025. Aircraft maintainers and crew chiefs supported this annual exercise, ensuring mission-ready aircraft and enabling seamless operations among Allied and partner nations. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Elizabeth Davis) Heightened Operational Stress and the Iran War  Navy personnel on aircraft carriers and destroyers in the region operate under a “heightened threat environment,” with constant demands for air and missile defense readiness.  “It’s a curse and a blessing at the same time, being on an aircraft carrier,” said retired Vice Admiral Andrew “Woody” Lewis, who did 11 aircraft carrier deployments of six months or more.  The blessing is that aircraft carriers are used for a lot of “very strategically important missions,” Lewis said. “And it’s a curse at the same time because you got to go, you get extended, you get these long periods of you don’t know what the hell is going on,” which impacts morale, Lewis added. The USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) has been extended on its deployment until May. And Navy leaders know that long deployments can cause burnout and harm morale. 230503-N-LK647-1143 ATLANTIC OCEAN (May 3, 2023) Capt. Errol Robinson, commanding officer, USS Normandy, third from left, and crew members assigned to the Ticonderoga-class guided missile cruiser USS Normandy (CG 60) watch from the bridge wing as the first-in-class aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) conducts a training emergency breakaway from the Henry J. Kaiser-class replenishment oiler USNS Leroy Grumman (T-AO 195) following a replenishment-at-sea, May 3, 2023. The Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group (GRFCSG) is conducting a scheduled deployment in the Atlantic Ocean. The GRFCSG provides an inherently flexible naval force capable of deploying across combatant commands to meet emerging missions, deter potential adversaries, reassure allies and partners, enhance security and guarantee the free flow of global commerce. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Malachi Lakey) Mental Health and Trauma: The Psychology Factor  The ongoing conflict has caused significant mental health challenges, including traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) among service members, with over 350 injuries reported early in the conflict, among Air Force and Army personnel on airbases in the Middle East that have been targeted by Iranian ballistic missiles.  There are reports of increased stress and vicarious trauma among those supporting the conflict.  The Strain On Families Back Home  The uncertainty surrounding the conflict has caused high anxiety and stress among military families, with many feeling as though they are on “pins and needles,” according to the Military Family Advisory Network. While military members focus on the tasks at hand, with very little time actually in danger, families at home are in the dark about what happens from one moment to the next and are constantly flooded with media reports that accentuate the possible negative outcomes of the fighting.  The crew of the first-in-class aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) man the rails as the ship returns to Naval Station Norfolk, Nov. 26, following the inaugural deployment with the Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group (GRFCSG). More than 4,600 Sailors assigned to Ford operated in U.S. 2nd Fleet and 6th Fleet, increasing interoperability and interchangeability with NATO Allies and partners. Throughout the deployment, the GRFCSG sailed more than 9,200 miles, completed more than 1,250 sorties, expended 78.3 tons of ordnance, completed 13 underway replenishments and hosted more than 400 distinguished visitors. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Jackson Adkins) Sense Of Purpose, And Finishing The Mission One of the most significant factors in military members’ morale is a sense of purpose, and the uncertainty they feel about senior military and political leadership’s willingness to allow the services to finish the mission. The military services are trained to fight and win wars. That is their raison d’être. The absolute worst thing for morale is for warfighters to feel that their service and sacrifices were in vain because the leadership lacked the vision or will to see the mission through to victory. Rep. Sheri Biggs (R-SC) wrote an article for War on the Rocks where she said, “As someone who has served overseas, I have witnessed strategic failures that stem from half-measures and ‘mowing the lawn’ in the Middle East.  “Strategic indecision does not just embolden our adversaries, it actively degrades the morale and mental health of our fighting force. When our men and women are deployed into harm’s way for objectives that are later abandoned or left unfinished, the psychological toll is compounded.  “A servicemember’s mental health is tied to a sense of purpose. If the mission is not finished, the trauma of combat is amplified by a sense of betrayal by the leadership that sent them there.” Ammunition is prepared for a .50 caliber machine gun during a live-fire crew certification exercise aboard the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Ramage (DDG 61) as part of the Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group, Oct. 26, 2022. The first-in-class aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) is on its inaugural deployment conducting training and operations alongside NATO Allies and partners to enhance integration for future operations and demonstrate the U.S. Navy’s commitment to a peaceful, stable and conflict free Atlantic region. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Sawyer Connally) Biggs finished her speech with a message for fellow servicemembers: “To the servicemembers currently on the decks of ships in the Persian Gulf or preparing for the next mission on an aircraft: Your mission has a purpose. We will not leave you in a cycle of strategic failure.  “We will finish the mission, we will restore deterrence, and we will ensure that the sacrifices made today lead to a nation that is strong, a homeland that is secure, and a world that respects our resolve. Peace through strength is more than a slogan — it is the only way we ensure the safety of our children and grandchildren.” Retention Rates Vary According To The Source: Recent articles by CNN and NPR claim that the military’s retention rates are cratering.  NPR wrote, “the people NPR spoke to for this story say they have seen undeniable cracks in the military’s ability to retain troops, largely due to low morale or ethical concerns.” It added, “‘Retention is the only thing holding the Army up, from a metrics standpoint. And it is crumbling fast,’ one career counselor with the Army, the largest branch of the military, said. A U.S. Navy Sailor assigned to the aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74), stands at parade rest as the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) pulls into port in Norfolk, Va., Nov. 20, 2020. The John C. Stennis is partnering with Newport News Shipbuilding to complete Refueling Complex Overhaul on schedule with a trained, resilient and cohesive crew. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Apprentice Curtis Burdick) However, the military’s retention across the board for 2025 has been extremely high. In a report to Congress, the services reported retention rates mostly above 100% across most categories.  The warfighters in the Middle East have thus far weathered the first six weeks of conflict well, and seeing how far our military will go to rescue one of its own, such as the rescue of the F-15E weapons officer, boosts morale by showing they will leave no one behind. About the Author: Steve Balestrieri  Steve Balestrieri is a National Security Columnist. He served as a US Army Special Forces NCO and Warrant Officer. In addition to writing on defense, he covers the NFL for PatsFans.com and is a member of the Pro Football Writers of America (PFWA). His work was regularly featured in many military publications. The post Psychology Suggests the ‘On-Again, Off-Again’ War Is the Most Psychologically Damaging Kind. U.S. Troops and Their Families Are Living It. appeared first on 19FortyFive.

Apr 14, 202610 votes

The U.S. Navy’s New $15,000,000,000 Columbia-Class Nuclear Submarine Is Way Behind Schedule

The U.S. Navy’s Columbia-Class Is the Future of America’s Nuclear Weapons Strategy…and It Has Some Issues to Iron Out Fast In the literal sense, a submarine being underwater is a good thing.  After all, that’s the whole raison d’être of an Unterseeboot: to stealthily and silently lurk beneath the waves. before striking mercilessly at an enemy’s seaborne and land-based assets alike (wielding torpedoes against the former and cruise missiles for the latter). Columbia-Class SSBN USN. Image Credit: Creative Commons. Except when in home port, far away from hostilities, the surface of the sea is where a sub is most vulnerable. But in the metaphorical, bureaucratic context, being “underwater” is a highly undesirable a place for a submarine program to be.  And in that context, the U.S. Navy’s upcoming Columbia-class nuclear-powered ballistic submarine (SSBN) program is seemingly above water one day, and back underwater the next. It’s enough to make this former Navy contractor downright seasick trying to keep track of it all. Glass Half-Empty: The Latest Bad News About the Columbias  The bad news is that the lead ship of the Columbia-class submarine is about a year behind schedule, with projected delivery in 2028.  As a stopgap measure, the Navy has a maintenance plan to extend the life of the time-honored Ohio-class SSBNs so they can last until the Columbia boats are finally fully built and operational. “Improvise, Adapt, Overcome,” as the one motivational military catchphrase goes.  The problem?  Well, as you can probably guess from this writer’s use of the phrase “time-honored,” the Ohios are getting long in the tooth, with the first ship of the class having been laid down back on April 10, 1976, while the newest of the bunch, the USS Louisiana (SSBN-743), was commissioned on September 6, 1997. Ohio-Class. Image Credit: U.S. Navy. All the while, Russia and China continue to modernize their own submarine fleets at a breakneck pace. Glass Half-Full: The Latest Good News About the Columbias Despite the gloomy news, Program Executive Officer, Strategic Submarines, Rear Admiral Todd Weeks remains upbeat.  Weeks stated last month that “With Columbia, we’ve been on a steady ramp-up to full-rate construction,” which is expected by 2031. Rear Admiral Weeks added that the lead vessel, the USS District of Columbia (SSBN-826), was “about 65, 66 percent complete.”  Full Speed Ahead? The Way Forward for the Columbia-Class Despite the delays, at least one prominent member of the Senate Armed Services Committee—namely Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL)—is open to the idea of expanding the Columbia program.  In a recent hearing featuring Admiral Richard Correll, the head of U.S. Strategic Command (STRATCOM), Sen. Tuberville opined that “Submarines are the tip of the spear for our nuclear capabilities. The problem is we can’t seem to build them fast enough. What flexibility and capability does STRATCOM gain if we were able to field 16 Columbia-class submarines versus 12?” Early rendering of what Columbia-class could look like Meanwhile, earlier this month the Navy awarded General Dynamics’ Electric Boat (GDEB) a $15.38 billion modification for work related to industrial-base development support, covering additional Columbia-class submarine design, lead yard support, and sustainment. READ MORE – Russia Only Has 30 Su-57 Stealth Fighters. America Has 1,300 F-35 Fighters  READ MORE – Iran Came Close to Hitting a Navy Super Hornet  About the Author: Christian D. Orr Christian D. Orr is a Senior Defense Editor. He is a former Air Force Security Forces officer, Federal law enforcement officer, and private military contractor (with assignments worked in Iraq, the United Arab Emirates, Kosovo, Japan, Germany, and the Pentagon). Chris holds a B.A. in International Relations from the University of Southern California (USC) and an M.A. in Intelligence Studies (concentration in Terrorism Studies) from American Military University (AMU). He is also the author of the newly published book “Five Decades of a Fabulous Firearm: Celebrating the 50th Anniversary of the Beretta 92 Pistol Series.” The post The U.S. Navy’s New $15,000,000,000 Columbia-Class Nuclear Submarine Is Way Behind Schedule appeared first on 19FortyFive.

Mar 28, 202614 votes