Search people, articles, bills, and more
This bill matters because it fundamentally shifts the burden of proof in pretrial detention hearings for a specific group of defendants. Currently, judges weigh evidence to decide if someone is a flight risk or a danger. If this bill becomes law, for non-citizens and non-green card holders, the judge would start with the assumption that they are a risk and a danger, making it more challenging for them to secure release before trial.
If it passes, it could lead to more non-citizens being held in federal detention centers while awaiting trial, regardless of the severity of the alleged crime or their personal circumstances in the U.S. If it doesn't pass, judges would continue to assess each case on its own merits without this specific legal presumption based on immigration status.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
This bill matters because it fundamentally shifts the burden of proof in pretrial detention hearings for a specific group of defendants. Currently, judges weigh evidence to decide if someone is a flight risk or a danger. If this bill becomes law, for non-citizens and non-green card holders, the judge would start with the assumption that they are a risk and a danger, making it more challenging for them to secure release before trial.
If it passes, it could lead to more non-citizens being held in federal detention centers while awaiting trial, regardless of the severity of the alleged crime or their personal circumstances in the U.S. If it doesn't pass, judges would continue to assess each case on its own merits without this specific legal presumption based on immigration status.