Search people, articles, bills, and more
This bill matters because it would permanently change how the U.S. government funds global health and development programs, particularly those related to reproductive health. If passed, it would make permanent the "Mexico City Policy" (often called the global gag rule), which has historically been reinstated and rescinded by different presidential administrations, causing significant policy shifts every few years. By codifying this policy into law, it would prevent future presidents from easily changing it back.
This means that organizations receiving U.S. aid would have to choose between providing comprehensive reproductive health services, including abortion-related care and referrals, or receiving U.S. funding. This could impact access to various health services for millions globally, potentially leading to a decrease in the availability of family planning and maternal care, or a shift in how these services are delivered by U.S.-funded partners. It would also represent a major policy win for those who advocate for federal funds to not be associated with abortion services.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
This bill matters because it would permanently change how the U.S. government funds global health and development programs, particularly those related to reproductive health. If passed, it would make permanent the "Mexico City Policy" (often called the global gag rule), which has historically been reinstated and rescinded by different presidential administrations, causing significant policy shifts every few years. By codifying this policy into law, it would prevent future presidents from easily changing it back.
This means that organizations receiving U.S. aid would have to choose between providing comprehensive reproductive health services, including abortion-related care and referrals, or receiving U.S. funding. This could impact access to various health services for millions globally, potentially leading to a decrease in the availability of family planning and maternal care, or a shift in how these services are delivered by U.S.-funded partners. It would also represent a major policy win for those who advocate for federal funds to not be associated with abortion services.