Condemning attempts to use Federal regulatory power or litigation to suppress lawful speech, particularly speech critical of a political party or the President of the United States, and warning against the rise of authoritarianism. | ChamberLight
Bills · HRES 748
IN COMMITTEE· 119TH CONGRESS
House Res.HRES 748Political movements and philosophiesCongressional-executive branch relations
Condemning attempts to use Federal regulatory power or litigation to suppress lawful speech, particularly speech critical of a political party or the President of the United States, and warning against the rise of authoritarianism.
INTRO SEP 19· LAST ACTION SEP 19
READING
5MIN
COSPONSORS
124
READER REACTIONS0 TOTAL
NO VOTES YET · BE THE FIRST
Non-binding
LEGISLATIVE PROGRESS
STEP 2 / 8
Introduced
In Committee
Reported
Passed House
Passed Senate
Conference
To President
Became Law
WHAT THE BILL DOES
AI-written
This resolution matters because it's a formal declaration by a branch of the government about what it considers acceptable conduct regarding free speech. Even though it doesn't create new laws, it sends a strong message that attempts to silence criticism, particularly from media or the public, are seen as undermining democratic principles.
If this resolution passes, it signals that a significant part of the House of Representatives believes that using government power to stifle dissent is dangerous and potentially authoritarian. If it doesn't pass, or if such resolutions are ignored, it could be interpreted as a weakening of the commitment to a free press and open criticism, potentially leading to a "chilling effect" where people become hesitant to speak out against powerful figures for fear of retribution, ultimately harming public discourse and government accountability.
KEY PROVISIONS
5AI-extracted
PROVISION 01
Condemns the use of federal regulatory agencies (like the FCC) and lawsuits to silence or punish lawful speech that criticizes a political party or the President.
This provision directly targets methods seen as suppressing free expression by those in power.
PROVISION 02
Warns that these practices resemble tactics used by authoritarian regimes and threaten U.S. democratic traditions and constitutional freedoms.
It frames the issue as a significant danger to the core values of the country.
PROVISION 03
Reaffirms the House's commitment to protecting the First Amendment rights of free speech and press for everyone, regardless of their political views.
It explicitly states the constitutional principle that the House is upholding.
PROVISION 04
Calls on all public officials to avoid using their power to pressure media or individuals into censoring constitutionally protected speech.
This aims to discourage direct political interference in independent media and individual expression.
PROVISION 05
Urges agencies like the Department of Justice and the FCC to ensure their policies protect free expression and are not used for political revenge.
It directs specific federal agencies to review their practices in light of free speech concerns.
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
IN COMMITTEE· 119TH CONGRESS · JUDICIARY COMMITTEE · INTRODUCED SEP 19, 2025
House Res.HRES 748Political movements and philosophiesCongressional-executive branch relations
Condemning attempts to use Federal regulatory power or litigation to suppress lawful speech, particularly speech critical of a political party or the President of the United States, and warning against the rise of authoritarianism.
This resolution matters because it's a formal declaration by a branch of the government about what it considers acceptable conduct regarding free speech. Even though it doesn't create new laws, it sends a strong message that attempts to silence criticism, particularly from media or the public, are seen as undermining democratic principles.
If this resolution passes, it signals that a significant part of the House of Representatives believes that using government power to stifle dissent is dangerous and potentially authoritarian. If it doesn't pass, or if such resolutions are ignored, it could be interpreted as a weakening of the commitment to a free press and open criticism, potentially leading to a "chilling effect" where people become hesitant to speak out against powerful figures for fear of retribution, ultimately harming public discourse and government accountability.
KEY PROVISIONS
AI-extracted
high
Condemns the use of federal regulatory agencies (like the FCC) and lawsuits to silence or punish lawful speech that criticizes a political party or the President.
This provision directly targets methods seen as suppressing free expression by those in power.
high
Warns that these practices resemble tactics used by authoritarian regimes and threaten U.S. democratic traditions and constitutional freedoms.
It frames the issue as a significant danger to the core values of the country.
med
Reaffirms the House's commitment to protecting the First Amendment rights of free speech and press for everyone, regardless of their political views.
It explicitly states the constitutional principle that the House is upholding.
med
Calls on all public officials to avoid using their power to pressure media or individuals into censoring constitutionally protected speech.
This aims to discourage direct political interference in independent media and individual expression.
med
Urges agencies like the Department of Justice and the FCC to ensure their policies protect free expression and are not used for political revenge.
It directs specific federal agencies to review their practices in light of free speech concerns.
GLOSSARY
AI-written
Federal regulatory power
The authority of government agencies to make and enforce rules that businesses and individuals must follow.
Litigation
The process of taking legal action, usually by bringing a lawsuit in court.
Suppress lawful speech
To prevent or stop people from expressing ideas or opinions that are protected by law, like free speech.
Authoritarianism
A form of government marked by strong central power and limited political freedoms, where individuals have little say.
First Amendment
The part of the U.S. Constitution that protects fundamental rights such as freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition.
Chilling effect
When people hesitate to exercise a legal right (like free speech) because they fear legal or political punishment for doing so.
ACTION TIMELINE
2 EVENTS
SEP 19, 25
Submitted in House
INTROREFERRAL
SEP 19, 25
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.