Search people, articles, bills, and more
This bill updates 1980s press laws to ensure that digital files and cloud data held by journalists are protected from government seizure and prevents any illegally taken records from being used as evidence.AI-written
Prevents law enforcement from using newsgathering materials in court if they were seized illegally, and ensures digital files in the cloud receive the same legal protections as physical notebooks.
In the digital age, a reporter's entire life of work might be stored in the cloud. Without these updates, the government could theoretically bypass the First Amendment by going to a tech company for a reporter's data without the reporter ever knowing. By creating a 'penalty' (the inability to use the evidence in court), this bill gives the government a strong reason to follow the law and respect press freedom. If this doesn't pass, journalists remain vulnerable to 'fishing expeditions' where the government uses digital subpoenas to identify anonymous sources.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
This bill updates 1980s press laws to ensure that digital files and cloud data held by journalists are protected from government seizure and prevents any illegally taken records from being used as evidence.AI-written
Prevents law enforcement from using newsgathering materials in court if they were seized illegally, and ensures digital files in the cloud receive the same legal protections as physical notebooks.
In the digital age, a reporter's entire life of work might be stored in the cloud. Without these updates, the government could theoretically bypass the First Amendment by going to a tech company for a reporter's data without the reporter ever knowing. By creating a 'penalty' (the inability to use the evidence in court), this bill gives the government a strong reason to follow the law and respect press freedom. If this doesn't pass, journalists remain vulnerable to 'fishing expeditions' where the government uses digital subpoenas to identify anonymous sources.
An AI model extracted this from the bill’s official record and can make mistakes. Check the official text ↗ (opens in new tab)
An AI model extracted this from the bill’s official record and can make mistakes. Check the official text ↗ (opens in new tab)
| TYPE | AMOUNT | WHO |
|---|---|---|
| administrative | Suppression of evidence (cannot be used in court) | Government prosecutors and law enforcement |
| administrative | Mandatory return and destruction of copies of seized materials | Government officers who seize materials without proper justification |