House BillHR 4366Labor standardsLabor-management relations
Save Local Business Act
INTRO JUL 14· LAST ACTION JAN 13
READING
3MIN
COSPONSORS
2
READER REACTIONS0 TOTAL
NO VOTES YET · BE THE FIRST
One chamber only
LEGISLATIVE PROGRESS
STEP 4 / 8
Introduced
In Committee
Reported
Passed House
Passed Senate
Conference
To President
Became Law
WHAT THE BILL DOES
AI-written
This bill matters because it changes who is legally responsible for workers in certain business setups. If this bill becomes law, it could make it easier for larger companies to avoid responsibility for labor violations or collective bargaining issues involving workers who are technically employed by a separate, smaller entity, like a franchisee or a staffing agency. This could impact workers' ability to recover unpaid wages, claim overtime, or form unions against a larger corporate entity.
For businesses, particularly those in franchise industries or those relying on contractors, this bill would provide more predictable rules. It could encourage more franchising and contracting by reducing the legal risks associated with being deemed a 'joint employer.' If it doesn't become law, the current, broader interpretations of joint employment would continue to apply, potentially leading to more shared liability for companies.
KEY PROVISIONS
3AI-extracted
PROVISION 01
The bill amends the National Labor Relations Act to define a 'joint employer' as one that directly, actually, and immediately exercises significant control over the essential terms and conditions of another employer's workers.
This provision sets a high bar for establishing joint employer status, making it more difficult for multiple entities to be held jointly responsible for employees under federal labor law.
PROVISION 02
It specifies that 'essential terms and conditions of employment' include concrete actions like hiring, firing, determining pay and benefits, day-to-day supervision, scheduling, assigning tasks, and disciplining employees.
By listing specific actions, the bill provides clear examples of the level of control required for joint employer status, guiding businesses and courts.
PROVISION 03
The bill applies the exact same strict 'direct, actual, and immediate control' standard to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.
This ensures a consistent and stricter definition of joint employer across two major federal laws governing wages, hours, and collective bargaining.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 988 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2988, H.R. 2262, H.R. 2270, H.R. 2312 and H.R. 4366. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2988 under a structured rule, and H.R. 2262, H.R. 2270, H.R. 2312, and H.R. 4366 under a closed rule. The rule provides for one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
HOUSE · FLOOR
DEC 30
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Workforce. H. Rept. 119-422.
This bill matters because it changes who is legally responsible for workers in certain business setups. If this bill becomes law, it could make it easier for larger companies to avoid responsibility for labor violations or collective bargaining issues involving workers who are technically employed by a separate, smaller entity, like a franchisee or a staffing agency. This could impact workers' ability to recover unpaid wages, claim overtime, or form unions against a larger corporate entity.
For businesses, particularly those in franchise industries or those relying on contractors, this bill would provide more predictable rules. It could encourage more franchising and contracting by reducing the legal risks associated with being deemed a 'joint employer.' If it doesn't become law, the current, broader interpretations of joint employment would continue to apply, potentially leading to more shared liability for companies.
KEY PROVISIONS
AI-extracted
high
The bill amends the National Labor Relations Act to define a 'joint employer' as one that directly, actually, and immediately exercises significant control over the essential terms and conditions of another employer's workers.
This provision sets a high bar for establishing joint employer status, making it more difficult for multiple entities to be held jointly responsible for employees under federal labor law.
med
It specifies that 'essential terms and conditions of employment' include concrete actions like hiring, firing, determining pay and benefits, day-to-day supervision, scheduling, assigning tasks, and disciplining employees.
By listing specific actions, the bill provides clear examples of the level of control required for joint employer status, guiding businesses and courts.
high
The bill applies the exact same strict 'direct, actual, and immediate control' standard to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.
This ensures a consistent and stricter definition of joint employer across two major federal laws governing wages, hours, and collective bargaining.
GLOSSARY
AI-written
Joint Employer
When two or more businesses are considered legally responsible for the same group of employees, sharing duties like setting wages, work hours, or supervising daily tasks.
National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)
A federal law that protects the rights of most private sector employees to organize, form unions, and engage in collective bargaining.
Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA)
A federal law that sets standards for minimum wage, overtime pay eligibility, recordkeeping, and child labor for most private and public sector employees.
Essential Terms and Conditions of Employment
The core elements of a job, such as hiring, firing, setting pay and benefits, daily supervision, work schedules, and discipline.
ACTION TIMELINE
8 EVENTS
JAN 13
Rule H. Res. 988 passed House.
FLOOR
JAN 12
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 988 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2988, H.R. 2262, H.R. 2270, H.R. 2312 and H.R. 4366. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2988 under a structured rule, and H.R. 2262, H.R. 2270, H.R. 2312, and H.R. 4366 under a closed rule. The rule provides for one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
FLOOR
DEC 30, 25
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Workforce. H. Rept. 119-422.