Search people, articles, bills, and more
This bill matters because it directly addresses widespread concerns about election integrity and security, which have been significant public issues in recent years. If passed, it would modernize federal election law to properly account for electronic records and voting equipment, which are central to contemporary elections. This could help prevent the destruction or alteration of critical election data and hardware, potentially increasing public confidence in the accuracy and fairness of election outcomes.
Without this bill, existing laws might not adequately cover the specific vulnerabilities of electronic records or modern equipment, and there would be fewer explicit protections for the individuals performing the sensitive work of counting and certifying votes. This could leave elections more susceptible to interference, threats, and errors, further eroding public trust in democratic processes. The bill's provisions for federal guidance and judicial review could also lead to more consistent and robust election administration practices nationwide.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
This bill matters because it directly addresses widespread concerns about election integrity and security, which have been significant public issues in recent years. If passed, it would modernize federal election law to properly account for electronic records and voting equipment, which are central to contemporary elections. This could help prevent the destruction or alteration of critical election data and hardware, potentially increasing public confidence in the accuracy and fairness of election outcomes.
Without this bill, existing laws might not adequately cover the specific vulnerabilities of electronic records or modern equipment, and there would be fewer explicit protections for the individuals performing the sensitive work of counting and certifying votes. This could leave elections more susceptible to interference, threats, and errors, further eroding public trust in democratic processes. The bill's provisions for federal guidance and judicial review could also lead to more consistent and robust election administration practices nationwide.
An AI model extracted this from the bill’s official record and can make mistakes. Check the official text ↗ (opens in new tab)
An AI model extracted this from the bill’s official record and can make mistakes. Check the official text ↗ (opens in new tab)
| TYPE | AMOUNT | WHO |
|---|---|---|
| criminal | Not more than $1,000 fine or not more than 1 year imprisonment, or both. | Any officer who willfully conceals, destroys, mutilates, alters, or falsifies any election record (including electronic record), paper, or election equipment, or whose reckless disregard of preservation requirements results in such actions. |
| criminal | Not more than $10,000 fine or not more than 5 years imprisonment, or both. | Any person who intimidates, threatens, or coerces, or attempts to intimidate, threaten, or coerce, any person for processing or scanning ballots, or tabulating, canvassing, or certifying voting results. |