Improving Law Enforcement Officer Safety and Wellness Through Data Act | ChamberLight
Bills · HR 2240
PASSED HOUSE· 119TH CONGRESS
House BillHR 2240Crime and Law Enforcement
Improving Law Enforcement Officer Safety and Wellness Through Data Act
INTRO MAR 21· LAST ACTION MAY 19
READING
8MIN
COSPONSORS
22
READER REACTIONS0 TOTAL
NO VOTES YET · BE THE FIRST
One chamber only
LEGISLATIVE PROGRESS
STEP 4 / 8
Introduced
In Committee
Reported
Passed House
Passed Senate
Conference
To President
Became Law
WHAT THE BILL DOES
AI-written
This bill matters because it aims to provide a clearer, more complete picture of the dangers law enforcement officers face, particularly from violent and ambush attacks, and to understand less severe but still impactful aggressive acts. If this bill becomes law, Congress and the Department of Justice would have more detailed data to inform decisions about officer safety, training, and resource allocation, such as funding for protective gear or mental health support.
Without this bill, decisions about how to protect officers and support their wellness might continue to be based on less comprehensive data, potentially missing critical insights into trends, effective interventions, or gaps in current programs. By requiring an analysis of current systems and recommendations for improvement, it could lead to more targeted and effective strategies to ensure officers are better prepared and protected, potentially improving public safety by supporting those who respond to crime.
KEY PROVISIONS
5AI-extracted
PROVISION 01
Requires the Attorney General to submit a report on violent attacks against law enforcement officers.
This report aims to gather comprehensive data on attacks, including ambush incidents, to better understand their nature and frequency.
PROVISION 02
Mandates an analysis of federal, state, and local responses and training programs for violent attacks against officers, along with recommendations for improvement.
This provision seeks to identify best practices and areas for improvement in how law enforcement agencies prepare for and react to officer attacks.
PROVISION 03
Requires an analysis of the Patrick Leahy Bulletproof Vest Partnership's effectiveness and limitations.
This helps determine if officers are receiving adequate protective gear and if the program needs adjustments to meet current threats like ambush attacks.
PROVISION 04
Calls for an analysis of current data collection systems, like LEOKA and NIBRS, to identify ways to combine or expand data on officer-involved incidents and officer injuries.
Improving data collection methods can lead to a more accurate and detailed understanding of incidents involving law enforcement.
PROVISION 05
Requires a second report analyzing the feasibility of creating a new category in crime reporting systems for aggressive or trauma-inducing incidents against officers not currently reported.
This could lead to better tracking of incidents that impact officer wellness, even if they don't involve severe injury, potentially informing mental health support.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
SENATE · INTROREFERRAL
MAY 15
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 405. (consideration: CR H2071-2077)
FLOOR
MAY 15
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2240, H.R. 2243 and H.R. 2255. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2240, H.R. 2243, and H.R. 2255. All bills are being considered under a closed rule with each bill having one motion to recommit.
HOUSE · FLOOR
MAY 15
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 2240.
This bill matters because it aims to provide a clearer, more complete picture of the dangers law enforcement officers face, particularly from violent and ambush attacks, and to understand less severe but still impactful aggressive acts. If this bill becomes law, Congress and the Department of Justice would have more detailed data to inform decisions about officer safety, training, and resource allocation, such as funding for protective gear or mental health support.
Without this bill, decisions about how to protect officers and support their wellness might continue to be based on less comprehensive data, potentially missing critical insights into trends, effective interventions, or gaps in current programs. By requiring an analysis of current systems and recommendations for improvement, it could lead to more targeted and effective strategies to ensure officers are better prepared and protected, potentially improving public safety by supporting those who respond to crime.
KEY PROVISIONS
AI-extracted
high
Requires the Attorney General to submit a report on violent attacks against law enforcement officers.
This report aims to gather comprehensive data on attacks, including ambush incidents, to better understand their nature and frequency.
high
Mandates an analysis of federal, state, and local responses and training programs for violent attacks against officers, along with recommendations for improvement.
This provision seeks to identify best practices and areas for improvement in how law enforcement agencies prepare for and react to officer attacks.
med
Requires an analysis of the Patrick Leahy Bulletproof Vest Partnership's effectiveness and limitations.
This helps determine if officers are receiving adequate protective gear and if the program needs adjustments to meet current threats like ambush attacks.
med
Calls for an analysis of current data collection systems, like LEOKA and NIBRS, to identify ways to combine or expand data on officer-involved incidents and officer injuries.
Improving data collection methods can lead to a more accurate and detailed understanding of incidents involving law enforcement.
high
Requires a second report analyzing the feasibility of creating a new category in crime reporting systems for aggressive or trauma-inducing incidents against officers not currently reported.
This could lead to better tracking of incidents that impact officer wellness, even if they don't involve severe injury, potentially informing mental health support.
Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act
Attorney General to submit two reports to Congress regarding attacks on law enforcement officers and aggressive actions against them.
GLOSSARY
AI-written
Attorney General
The chief law enforcement officer and head of the U.S. Department of Justice, advising the President on legal matters.
Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted (LEOKA) Data Collection
A program run by the FBI that collects data on officers feloniously or accidentally killed and assaulted in the line of duty.
National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS)
A detailed crime reporting system used by law enforcement agencies to collect information on individual crime incidents, including victims, offenders, and circumstances.
Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) System
A nationwide program compiled by the FBI that collects crime data from law enforcement agencies, including statistics on offenses and arrests.
Feloniously killed
Refers to a death that results from criminal action, specifically when an officer is killed by another person in the line of duty.
Ambush attacks
Surprise attacks on law enforcement officers, often without warning or provocation, while they are performing their duties.
Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division
ACTION TIMELINE
17 EVENTS
MAY 19, 25
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
INTROREFERRAL
MAY 15, 25
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 405. (consideration: CR H2071-2077)
FLOOR
MAY 15, 25
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2240, H.R. 2243 and H.R. 2255. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2240, H.R. 2243, and H.R. 2255. All bills are being considered under a closed rule with each bill having one motion to recommit.
FLOOR
MAY 15, 25
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 2240.