Search people, articles, bills, and more
This bill matters because it addresses concerns about animal welfare in the cosmetics industry. If it becomes law, it would significantly reduce, and in many cases eliminate, the practice of using animals to test cosmetic ingredients and finished products in the U.S. This would align the U.S. with a growing number of countries and regions that have already banned cosmetic animal testing, such as the European Union, India, Israel, and others. For consumers, it means greater assurance that the cosmetics they buy were not tested on animals.
If this bill doesn't pass, cosmetic animal testing could continue in the U.S., and there would be no federal ban on selling products here that were animal-tested elsewhere. This would mean a patchwork of state laws and varying ethical standards across the country, rather than a uniform national approach to humane cosmetics. It could also continue to put U.S. cosmetic companies at a disadvantage or create complexity when trying to sell products in markets with existing animal testing bans.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
This bill matters because it addresses concerns about animal welfare in the cosmetics industry. If it becomes law, it would significantly reduce, and in many cases eliminate, the practice of using animals to test cosmetic ingredients and finished products in the U.S. This would align the U.S. with a growing number of countries and regions that have already banned cosmetic animal testing, such as the European Union, India, Israel, and others. For consumers, it means greater assurance that the cosmetics they buy were not tested on animals.
If this bill doesn't pass, cosmetic animal testing could continue in the U.S., and there would be no federal ban on selling products here that were animal-tested elsewhere. This would mean a patchwork of state laws and varying ethical standards across the country, rather than a uniform national approach to humane cosmetics. It could also continue to put U.S. cosmetic companies at a disadvantage or create complexity when trying to sell products in markets with existing animal testing bans.
An AI model extracted this from the bill’s official record and can make mistakes. Check the official text ↗ (opens in new tab)
An AI model extracted this from the bill’s official record and can make mistakes. Check the official text ↗ (opens in new tab)
| TYPE | AMOUNT | WHO |
|---|---|---|
| civil | Not more than $10,000 for each such violation | Any person who violates this section |
| civil | Each violation with respect to a separate animal, and each day that a violation continues, constitutes a separate offense (meaning penalties can stack) | Any person who violates this section |