Search people, articles, bills, and more
“Motion to table amendment SA 4236 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 67 - 33. Record Vote Number: 15.”
This amendment attempted to remove all 'earmarks'—funding set aside for specific local projects requested by lawmakers—from the 2026 government spending bill. The Senate voted to table the amendment, effectively rejecting it and keeping those local projects in the final law.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
“Motion to table amendment SA 4236 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 67 - 33. Record Vote Number: 15.”
This amendment attempted to remove all 'earmarks'—funding set aside for specific local projects requested by lawmakers—from the 2026 government spending bill. The Senate voted to table the amendment, effectively rejecting it and keeping those local projects in the final law.
This amendment represents a recurring debate in Congress over whether lawmakers should be able to direct money to specific projects in their districts or if those decisions should be left to federal agencies.
This primarily affected local governments, non-profits, and universities that were scheduled to receive specific federal grants through the bill.
This law provides full-year funding for most of the federal government, including the military and schools, while temporarily extending Homeland Security funding.AI-written