Search people, articles, bills, and more
“Amendment SA 3697, under the order of 10/9/2025, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 46. Record Vote Number: 564.”
This amendment would have required the government to review how it calculates 'locality pay'—the extra money federal employees receive based on where they live and work. It also proposed a trial program to test different ways of determining these pay amounts to see if they accurately reflect local job markets.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
“Amendment SA 3697, under the order of 10/9/2025, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 46. Record Vote Number: 564.”
This amendment would have required the government to review how it calculates 'locality pay'—the extra money federal employees receive based on where they live and work. It also proposed a trial program to test different ways of determining these pay amounts to see if they accurately reflect local job markets.
Locality pay is a major part of a federal employee's total compensation, especially in expensive cities; changing the math behind these payments could lead to significant raises or smaller increases for thousands of workers.
This most directly affects civilian federal employees who work in areas with high costs of living or competitive private-sector job markets.