Search people, articles, bills, and more
“On agreeing to the Biggs (AZ) amendment (A021) Failed by recorded vote: 200 - 228 (Roll no. 259).”
This amendment would have prevented the government from designating military lands as protected wildlife habitats and exempted military personnel from environmental laws if they accidentally harmed endangered species during defense operations. The amendment failed, so current environmental protections for military property and personnel remain in place.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
An amendment numbered 29 printed in Part A of House Report 119-255 to prohibit the designation of military and certain National Guard lands as critical habitats under the Endangered Species Act when deemed necessary by the Department of Defense. Exempts military personnel from Endangered Species Act prohibitions during national defense-related operations, including incidental harm to protected species.
“On agreeing to the Biggs (AZ) amendment (A021) Failed by recorded vote: 200 - 228 (Roll no. 259).”
This amendment would have prevented the government from designating military lands as protected wildlife habitats and exempted military personnel from environmental laws if they accidentally harmed endangered species during defense operations. The amendment failed, so current environmental protections for military property and personnel remain in place.
This reflects a debate over whether environmental regulations hinder military readiness. Proponents argue for more freedom to train and build on military land, while opponents argue for maintaining protections for rare wildlife on those same lands.
This would have most directly affected the Department of Defense, military personnel stationed on large bases, and environmental agencies responsible for wildlife conservation.