Search people, articles, bills, and more
“On agreeing to the Schweikert amendment (A014) Failed by recorded vote: 76 - 351 (Roll no. 237).”
This amendment proposed cutting over $37 billion from the bill by reclaiming 'unobligated funds,' which is money that was previously authorized but has not yet been officially spent or committed to projects. Because the amendment failed, the original funding levels for energy and water projects remained the same. This means the money stays available for its intended use rather than being returned to the Treasury.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
An amendment numbered 33 printed in House Report 119-232 to revise appropriations to reduce unobligated funds from top-line accounts totaling $37,353,345,385.09.
“On agreeing to the Schweikert amendment (A014) Failed by recorded vote: 76 - 351 (Roll no. 237).”
This amendment proposed cutting over $37 billion from the bill by reclaiming 'unobligated funds,' which is money that was previously authorized but has not yet been officially spent or committed to projects. Because the amendment failed, the original funding levels for energy and water projects remained the same. This means the money stays available for its intended use rather than being returned to the Treasury.
Cutting $37 billion would have been a significant reduction in available resources for various energy and water projects, such as infrastructure maintenance or research. Its failure indicates that most lawmakers preferred to keep those funds available for their currently planned uses.
Federal agencies like the Department of Energy and the Army Corps of Engineers are most affected, as they keep their existing budget authority to spend this money on public works and energy programs.