Search people, articles, bills, and more
“On agreeing to the Luna amendment (A018) Agreed to by recorded vote: 280 - 142 (Roll no. 148). (consideration: CR H3306-3307)”
This amendment removes sections of the bill that would have limited the power of states to regulate pesticides. If passed, states would keep their current authority to set their own rules for pesticide labels and how they are used.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
An amendment numbered 28 printed in Part B of House Report 119-628 to strike section 10205 (relating to uniformity of pesticide labeling), section 10206 (relating to authority of States), and section 10207 (relating to lawful use of authorized pesticides).
“On agreeing to the Luna amendment (A018) Agreed to by recorded vote: 280 - 142 (Roll no. 148). (consideration: CR H3306-3307)”
This amendment removes sections of the bill that would have limited the power of states to regulate pesticides. If passed, states would keep their current authority to set their own rules for pesticide labels and how they are used.
This is a debate over 'federal preemption'—whether the federal government or individual states should have the final say on pesticide safety and labeling. It determines whether a state like California or Florida can require specific health warnings that aren't required by the EPA.
This affects farmers, pesticide manufacturers, state environmental regulators, and local communities that advocate for specific pesticide restrictions.