Search people, articles, bills, and more
“On agreeing to the Roy amendment (A001) Failed by recorded vote: 163 - 257, 1 Present (Roll no. 26).”
This amendment proposed cutting the budget for the District of Columbia’s federal courts by 20%. It also specifically sought to eliminate funding for the salaries and expenses of the staff working for two specific federal judges.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
An amendment numbered 1 printed in House Report 119-445 to reduce the District of Columbia District and Appeals Court funding by 20% and to strike the salary and expense funding for Judges Boasberg and Boardman's staff.
“On agreeing to the Roy amendment (A001) Failed by recorded vote: 163 - 257, 1 Present (Roll no. 26).”
This amendment proposed cutting the budget for the District of Columbia’s federal courts by 20%. It also specifically sought to eliminate funding for the salaries and expenses of the staff working for two specific federal judges.
This proposal represents an attempt to use the federal budget to penalize or restrict the operations of specific judges and the local federal court system.
The D.C. court system and the staff members of the two named judges would have been most directly impacted by these financial cuts.