Search people, articles, bills, and more
“On agreeing to the Roy amendment (A002) Failed by recorded vote: 208 - 214 (Roll no. 353).”
This amendment tried to limit the scope of federal environmental reviews for major projects. It would have required government agencies to only look at environmental impacts that they have the specific legal authority to control, rather than looking at broader environmental consequences outside their jurisdiction.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
An amendment numbered 5 printed in House Report 119-410 to revise the scope of review clause so the bill clarifies that NEPA review only applies to environmental impacts that the lead agency or cooperating federal agencies have the legal authority to regulate.
“On agreeing to the Roy amendment (A002) Failed by recorded vote: 208 - 214 (Roll no. 353).”
This amendment tried to limit the scope of federal environmental reviews for major projects. It would have required government agencies to only look at environmental impacts that they have the specific legal authority to control, rather than looking at broader environmental consequences outside their jurisdiction.
Proponents of such measures argue they prevent 'regulatory creep' and speed up project approvals by focusing on an agency's specific job. Opponents generally argue that agencies should consider the full picture of environmental damage, even if they don't have the power to fix every single part of it.
This would have primarily affected federal agencies, developers of large infrastructure projects, and environmental advocacy groups by narrowing the legal grounds for environmental reviews.